Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 July 1

= July 1 =

01:32, 1 July 2023 review of submission by 72.252.188.194
I have done the citation issues raised by the reviewer. Please provide guidance where possible so that the submission is improved. Thanks in advance. 72.252.188.194 (talk) 01:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * This draft has been resubmitted, and will be reviewed in due course. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

06:42, 1 July 2023 review of submission by 2402:8100:2178:D0F8:0:0:90A3:37DA
What changes I need to do 2402:8100:2178:D0F8:0:0:90A3:37DA (talk) 06:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * There are no changes you need to do, because the article has been rejected given the subject is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, meaning it cannot be resubmitted. Unless you can prove that Krish kajia is notable by Wikipedia's standards (a quick google search pulls up no reliable sources, so I find that extremely unlikely, and there isn't even a claim to notability in the article), no matter what changes you make, the article will never be accepted. Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)  06:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

10:07, 1 July 2023 review of submission by Salindersingh505
I need to make Page on Manav Faakir.. Can you assist me how to do that>?? Salindersingh505 (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Why do you need to do this? We don't have "pages" here, we have 'articles.  Your draft article was rejected, and will not be considered further absent a fundamental change here.  331dot (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

10:13, 1 July 2023 review of submission by Dr. Tanmay Goswami
i want to see my deleted article so i can review my mistakes Dr. Tanmay Goswami (talk) 10:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I've fixed your post to provide a link to the deleted draft which was in your sandbox. It's best to create new drafts via Articles for Creation or the Article Wizard.  Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please read the autobiography policy.  Any article about you should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about you, showing how you meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person.  This is usually very difficult for people to do about themselves. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

15:27, 1 July 2023 review of submission by Charliephere
i need more help to make this more like an actual wikipedia page and to just add more detail with the information Charliephere (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * See WP:REFB for starters and note that they are called articles NOT pages. Your draft currently gives no indication that the topic is notable. Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

17:27, 1 July 2023 review of submission by V.B.Speranza
Need help finding reliable sources and more information about Tom Rice V.B.Speranza (talk) 17:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. This page is not for requesting co-authors to work with you or do research for you. 331dot (talk) 22:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

19:49, 1 July 2023 review of submission by ThomFett
My article was rejected for lacking reliable sources, but I am the reliable source. I'm Thomas Sloat. How do I fix this? ThomFett (talk) 19:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You can't, a topic must be written about in independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the topic. If no independent sources have written about it, it cannot have an article on Wikipedia. You are a firsthand source, but that is not what we mean by a reliable source.
 * The draft was declined, not rejected. "Rejected" has a specific meaning here, that it cannot be resubmitted. Declined means it may be resubmitted- but you need to summarize what independent reliable sources say, not what you say. 331dot (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)