Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 June 11

= June 11 =

requête to soulve review article, add info supported by cited references fix in Draft:Tazi Habiba
I'm new user Morroco, you can help me to work by Asking to have références and added by other information, all the necessary sources and by formatting it correctly, and Proofreading my first articles? Draft:Tazi_Habiba write an article backwards. You should start by finding sufficient published WP:Reliable sources,and then adding more details from more sources I've traductions the page from Tazi Habiba i love your job to find the sources and put a good article thank you for your help Thanks again! I appreciate the feedback! 41.250.236.88 (talk) 02:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

04:09:27, 11 June 2023 review of draft by PrincessPandaWiki
The draft is nearing completion and I feel the subject strongly needs an article in the mainspace. However, the soundtrack tables have empty cells as a result of a lack of concrete information about their respective songs. What should be done with them? ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 04:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Easy answer? Simply remove them. You can always add them back if concrete sourcing is found, but it's better to err on the side of leaving out unconfirmable information, especially when it has potential to be wrong (e.g. with an upcoming game). If you have a source for a few songs in specific, you can probably work them into the prose somehow if they're significant. Good luck! Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)  04:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * So you're telling me to remove the soundtrack tables altogether or alter them so that they only contain confirmed information? ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki  (talk | contribs) 04:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Remove all unconfirmed information, then take a look at the table. If it still works as a table, keep it. If it doesn't work as a table, convert to prose what can be. Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)  04:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You can definitely leave them in your own sandbox or in the talk page once the page is (hopefully) accepted. But for now, officially at least, unconformable info needs to go. Guninvalid (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * There is no place on Wikipedia for information that is not verifable --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

10:45, 11 June 2023 review of submission by TheNuggeteer
I wanted to know just how to make an article look god the he reviewers? TheNuggeteer (talk) 10:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @TheNuggeteer: it's a pity you didn't think to ask for advice sooner. Did you read any of the earlier decline notices? They all flag up the same problem, namely that the draft needs multiple sources that meet the WP:GNG standard; yet, it cites none. Hence, this draft has now been rejected, and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

11:03, 11 June 2023 review of submission by 103.175.169.177
Could you tell me what should I improve ? 103.175.169.177 (talk) 11:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Nothing; this draft has been rejected and is awaiting deletion.
 * If this is/was you writing about yourself, please see WP:AUTOBIO for all the reasons why that's not a good idea, and also WP:PROMO which explains why promotional content is not allowed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

12:06, 11 June 2023 review of submission by Dawoodibrahimhimself
I was told the references aren't good enough, however these are the best references anyone can find regarding this specific topic, I don't think anyone could find any better, however I am confident in how correct they are. Dawoodibrahimhimself (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * If that is all there is for sources, the topic does not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

19:47, 11 June 2023 review of submission by GonzoGuad
I have images that are being rejected, what is the process to give the images proper credit so they will be accepted? For example, one image is a portrait taken by the subject of the biography article I am trying to submit. He provided the image as part of the article, what do I need to do to get it cleared? Thanks. GonzoGuad (talk) 19:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * First, images are not relevant to the draft approval process, which only considers the text and sources. You don't need to worry about images until the draft is accepted as an article and placed in the encyclopedia.
 * Second, you should declare your conflict of interest. If you have a paid relationship with the subject, the Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing disclosure.
 * Regarding your question, it is much easier if the photographer uploads the images themselves. It's much harder when a third party is involved, as the third party does not have the copyright. Please see WP:UPIMAGE for more information. 331dot (talk) 19:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

20:16:36, 11 June 2023 review of draft by ChristophMinnameier
Hi, I'm asking for help because I don't want to do anything wrong. Especially in my case (because I'm connected to the game the article is about) I want to make sure that everything I do is legitimate, so I thought it would be a good idea to bring attention to this by asking for help.

ChristophMinnameier (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * What help are you seeking? What is the nature of your conflict of interest? 331dot (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * This certainly seems fine to me, though some of your sources are definitely better than others, and your formatting definitely needs a rework. But with your conflict of interest, depending on how deep it is, it may be more appropriate for you to hand this article to someone else to write. But idk im not a reviewer lol Guninvalid (talk) 21:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Suggestions:
 * Wikipedia articles typically list awards in a table. You can look at wikipedia articles for other well known games for a format guide.
 * You're almost definitely gonna need to add a Gameplay or Story section.
 * Guninvalid (talk) 21:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @ChristophMinnameier none of the above by Guninvalid has anything to do with the acceptance criteria. What you need to meet is WP:GNG which for video games means in-depth reviews by reliable sources.  See WP:WikiProject Video games/Sources for a guide.  S0091 (talk) 21:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, in-depth reviews by reliable sources are absolutely available.
 * The game has 19 critics reviews on metacritic for Switch alone (including many major gaming sites):
 * https://www.metacritic.com/game/switch/dungeons-of-dreadrock.
 * I quoted the awards pages mainly because in German Wikipedia, video games face (as it seems to me) stricter criteria to be considered relevant. I abstained deliberatly from creating a longer article.
 * Would you suggest to quote some of the reviews before I submit the article draft? ChristophMinnameier (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @ChristophMinnameier if you want a review, you need to submit it by clicking the blue "Submit the draft for review!" button. Before you do though, you need to fix the URLs to the Metacritic site as they are all coming up with a '504' error and being redirected to the main page. S0091 (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! ChristophMinnameier (talk) 06:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)