Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 June 2

= June 2 =

04:30, 2 June 2023 review of submission by Guman1008
Hmm.. Because of links I provide Guman1008 (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Guman1008: you don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a social media platform where you can tell the world about yourself. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:55, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

08:11, 2 June 2023 review of submission by Mechanical pk
i created an article on my village. I Provided all important info in article but its get desclined?? Why Mechanical pk (talk) 08:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Mechanical pk: I declined your earlier sandbox draft because it was inadequately referenced and promotional. Your latest attempt is at Draft:Mahori, India awaiting review, although I will have to go and decline it also, as it seems to be a copyright violation. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ohhh man fucker wheri i violate the rights plese explain/ Mechanical pk (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Personal attacks are not tolerated. We will help you only if you remain civil. 331dot (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

08:27:17, 2 June 2023 review of draft by 86.3.41.180
86.3.41.180 (talk) 08:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

What have I done wrong?
 * It appears that there is insufficient notability for the company, but some content could be included in the article about Xuxa herself. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

17:06, 2 June 2023 review of submission by Webdevelopersujan
Hi Team

This draft is rejected. So please accept this draft. Webdevelopersujan (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Webdevelopersujan: it isn't rejected, only declined. Although that being said, I will go and attend to it.
 * Please see WP:N about the core concept of notability, and WP:AUTO for all the reasons why you shouldn't be writing about yourself. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

19:13, 2 June 2023 review of submission by Texasforever1320
Can you explain why our draft does not meet the requirements of wikipdia's grammar formatting with examples from our draft page? Texasforever1320 (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * So who is "our"? Your account should only be operated by a single individual who may not give others access.  Do you represent Mr. Hopper?
 * Before you get to grammar the first problem you have is that Mr. Hopper does not meet the Wikipedia definition of a notable politician- which generally requires one hold public office or have at least won election to public office. Mr. Hopper ran for the Texas House but lost in the primary, so he does not meet that definition. The article calls Mr. Hopper a conservative activist but does not detail much about his activism or what makes him meet the broader Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Has his influence led to a particular policy or law?  Has he been influential in the campaigns of others?  Things like that. 331dot (talk) 19:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I emphasize the comments of a reviewer, "the sources you have are either not independent (affiliated with Hopper), database entries or similar, or have only brief mentions of Hopper. Are there newspaper articles from independent sources with at least a couple paragraphs of substantive content about him?". 331dot (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Language like is a clearcut violation of the Neutral point of view. This is advocacy language that does not belong in a neutral encyclopedia article. Cullen328 (talk) 08:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)