Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 June 27

= June 27 =

00:31, 27 June 2023 review of submission by Iamakisah
My article is notable but I'm unable to prove that it is notable Iamakisah (talk) 00:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Iamakisah: okay. Well, here at Wikipedia we're only interested in what can be proven. In any case, this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

13:51, 27 June 2023 review of submission by Ajayraj890
I want to make sure if this article will be accepted if i request the review of this article. Ajayraj890 (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Ajayraj890. You need to work on the tone of your article draft. This line, for example, is not written in a Neutral point of view "After failing to defend, Marthanda Varma decided to pay a huge amount and gave them presents. After making peace, they retraced thier steps and the territory was free again".
 * I also note that "thier" in the above sentence is spelt incorrectly, you have a misplaced "The" at the end of the first sentence (and a few missing full stops).
 * Have a read of Manual of Style and specifically Manual of Style/Words to watch, which should help you understand what types of phrases and words to avoid in the future.
 * Hope that helps, Qcne (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the advice. It really helps to improve the article. Ajayraj890 (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sir/Mam, your advice is really helpful. But this article is about a military conflict(siege). So, I can't display the event without using such phrases. And I will improve my grammar. Ajayraj890 (talk) 15:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @Ajayraj890. You can definitely use neutral language to describe a military conflict. Something like... "Following a failed defence, Marthanda Varma secured a peace agreement through payment and gifts, leading to the withdrawal of the Sultanate forces and restoration of the previous territorial autonomy." Qcne (talk) 15:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you again for your help. Ajayraj890 (talk) 15:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

14:10, 27 June 2023 review of submission by 90.156.76.117
In general, I edited this article myself and made the footnotes myself.... The sources in the books are authentic. Please check this. They are in English. It took me a long time to write this article. I gave the Polish page about the phenomenon of selective photothermolysis, because it is described in this link. Of course, I gave a reference from Poland, because information such as scientific discoveries is easiest for me to understand in Polish. And as I come from Poland, I read it in Polish. The phenomenon of selective photothermolysis is important and I am sorry that my source as I come from Poland and the source is also from Poland has been discriminated :( . This phenomenon is really well described in the article I linked to. And the phenomenon of photothermolysis, which is an important element in the history of hair removal. This is an important discovery that has greatly changed the ways of hair removal. 90.156.76.117 (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm happy to be proven wrong in my assessment, but so far not convinced.
 * In any case worth noting that an article on Hair removal (with a section on History) already exists, which you can develop. Just don't post spammy links again, please. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * But please go to this link and copy the content that is on this subpage. Click on: [Spam link redacted] and see the content of this link...you can translate it in Google and check. It accurately describes the phenomenon of selective photothermolysis. Sources are also provided in this link. This is not a spam link... 90.156.76.117 (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * all the content is about the history of epilation as you can see 90.156.76.117 (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It is a spam link, because it is a commercial service provider, and you are posting it everywhere although I've asked you not to. And in any case, it is only a blog, and carries absolutely no credence as a source. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Let's take a look at a couple of the other sources you've cited in this draft.
 * The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 8(4), 2009, s. 284-287, is (according to this draft) meant to have a paper titled "The History of Hair Removal"; instead it has "Phospholipid-based formulation with improved attributes of coal tar"
 * The American Journal of Nursing, 64(2), 130-131, should have a paper titled "Magic and Medical Science in Ancient Egypt", but instead has "Drug data".
 * (These are just two of the 12 offline sources cited, but they were the first two I checked, so I stopped there.)
 * Can you explain where I've gone wrong, or otherwise why that might be? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you chech it? [Spam link redacted] ? Please? will be very grateful because I spent all day yesterday and today preparing all this, so please check this page and content that it is ok. If you can? I will really appreciate it if you translate it and check it yourself (I mean link content) 90.156.76.117 (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * check
 * 90.156.76.117 (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I work at University: https://www.isksio.uni.wroc.pl/instytut/struktura-instytutu/pracownie/osrodek-badan-nad-historia-i-kultura-zydow-z-poludniowej-polski/pracownicy-i-doktoranci/mgr-lukasz-krzyszczuk/ You can write to this email on that link.  if you want? 90.156.76.117 (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi IP editor.
 * A bunch of your sources do not seem to exist? Did you use a Large Language Model like ChatGPT to generate these sources? The only reference to some of these sources that I can find is on the Ukrainian Wikipedia here (which seems to be a translated article of your draft?) and the Arabic Wikipedia here (which has now been deleted, but still appears in Google's cache).
 * I don't understand why you would think it would be appropriate to have an encyclopaedic article with fake sources.
 * Best, Qcne (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * https://www.worldcat.org/title/1231176721 90.156.76.117 (talk) 15:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The first source is not a book but a magazine 90.156.76.117 (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * What's your point? That book isn't cited in this draft. And in any case, it seems to have no coverage of hair removal methods.
 * I think we've pretty much reached the end of this debate. To recap:
 * The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further.
 * There is an existing article published in the main space, where salient parts of your proposed content can be incorporated.
 * Please stop posting spam links.
 * Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The following sources have issues:
 * - The History of Hair Removal. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 8(4), 2009, s. 284-287 No such article seems to exist
 * - Tyldesley, J. (2008). The Ancient Egyptians: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press The author is Shaw, not Tyldesley?
 * - Sobek, M., & Sobek, C. (2006). How to Make Your Own Egyptian Tomb: For Fun and Learning. Sobek Publishing No such book seems to exist
 * - Harlow, M., & Barret, R. (2004). A Short History of the Roman Mass. Michael Glazier No such book seems to exist
 * - Sleeswyk, A. W. (1979). Puberty: Physiological and Psychological Considerations. F. A. Davis Company No such book seems to exist
 * - Khairullah, N. (1997). The Beauty Market in the Arab Middle East: A Study of Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Boston College No such book seems to exist Qcne (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @DoubleGrazing Article has returned: Draft:History of hair removal with the same spammy link in citation no.1  Qcne  (talk)  19:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I have blocked the IP address which started this discussion, and another one responsible for similar spamming, and I have deleted two spam drafts they created. JBW (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

20:47, 27 June 2023 review of submission by 90.156.76.117
What should I do to properly publish this article? Can I ask for tips? 90.156.76.117 (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * All right. Sorry. I didn't read it. I will try to add this information to the epilation history under "depilation". 90.156.76.117 (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

21:04, 27 June 2023 review of submission by Petnog
I'm trying to create the article Atlantic Core Network Corridor, but it hasn't been approved. I'm not sure why, though. I think the references I used are definitely better than most of the pages for the other corridors of the TEN-T. Can anyone help? Petnog (talk) 21:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:OSE as to why that is a poor argument, it could be that those are inappropriate as well. You only have two sources and the article does little more than say this exists. To pass this process most reviewers look for at least three sources with significant coverage. It could be that this portion of the corridor does not merit a standalone article and could be included in the article about the larger project. 331dot (talk) 21:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)