Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 June 3

= June 3 =

05:45, 3 June 2023 review of submission by DevanshuTSA
I want to know what I add or what I do for successfully added my page in Wikipedia. Please guide me DevanshuTSA (talk) 05:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @DevanshuTSA: the absolute very first thing you need to do is formally disclose your relationship with the organisation in question; this has been requested several times, but so far I've not found your disclosure or any other response to this matter. You are at a risk of being blocked for undisclosed paid editing.
 * As for this draft, it has been rejected as the subject does not appear to be notable enough to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. The draft will therefore not be considered further at this time. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

08:06, 3 June 2023 review of submission by Asadsaadis
I am currently experiencing difficulties in getting my draft for "Star Marketing Pvt Ltd" approved on Wikipedia. The company has been operating since 2005 in Pakistan and has gained recognition through its notable presence in various national and international news websites. Despite these credentials, I am unsure why the draft is facing obstacles in the approval process. I would greatly appreciate a detailed guide on how to navigate this situation. Thank you. Asadsaadis (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * First, if you are associated with this company in some way, please read conflict of interest and paid editing(which includes general employment) for information on required disclosures. Declaring a paid relationship is a Terms of Use requirement.
 * The sources you have provided are all documentation of the routine business activities of the company. This does not establish that the company meets our special definition of a notable company. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage- coverage beyond the mere activities of the company- have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets that notability definition. Wikipedia wants to know what sources consider important/significant/influential about the company, based on their own views and not on materials from the company like press releases, interviews, announcements of its activities, and the like.  Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Asadsaadis: the draft is promotional in tone and content, and the sources are just routine business reporting and churnalism, which do not establish notability per WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * , Marketing activity is not allowed on Wikipedia. Advertising is not allowed. Public relations is not allowed. Promotion is not allowed. I hope that is clear. Cullen328 (talk) 08:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

12:53, 3 June 2023 review of submission by Gdhaye
My article submission keeps being rejected It states the reason is that there aren't enough adequate "reliable sources". We've created a Wikipedia page for our narrative podcast series... we've provided links to the podcast, individual episodes and also media coverage on the podcast from The Telegraph (UK) and The Athletic (UK). Both are very well respected and relaible media outlets.

We've also provided links through social media profiles for the producers as a way of validating them.

What other sources can I provide to avoid this being rejected again?

Many thanks in advance for any comments and assistance. Gdhaye (talk) 12:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I've fixed the formatting of your comment(you had a comment where the name of your draft should be, for linking purposes). The draft was declined, not rejected.  "Rejected" has a specific meaning, that resubmission would not be possible.  Declined means that resubmission is possible.
 * Who is "we"? Only a single person should be operating your account. Do you represent the podcast or those that make it?  The draft should primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the podcast and its importance/significance/influence, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notable web content. 331dot (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reaching out.
 * When I say "we" I just mean the team, but I'm operating the account.
 * The sources provided do explain the significance of the podcast, outlining how it's revealing new details about Chelsea FC, from ownership to events that happened behind the scenes at the club that haven't been amde public until now. The podcast has made news headlines on account of this, some of which I have also referenced. Gdhaye (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * So you represent the team?
 * Every podcast reveals details about its chosen topic. That doesn't make it particularly important or influential. If you have independent reliable sources that discuss what they see as significant or important about this podcast, please offer them. The sources you have in the article currently do not do that. 331dot (talk) 13:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

12:58:33, 3 June 2023 review of draft by Tiwarisk009
Tiwarisk009 (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't ask a question; you submitted a blank draft. 331dot (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Articles for creation process, review of submission draft:Anzor_Alem
Hi, I fixed the issues you mentioned for my draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anzor_Alem

but I am not auto confirmed so please can you can write that article

If you click the link to the draft, you should be able to create it. Congopro (talk) 13:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Congopro: you have resubmitted Draft:Anzor Alem and it is awaiting review. What is your question? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I would like to know if it will take how long to be examined Congopro (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Congopro Your draft will be reviewed when it is reviewed- there is nothing you can do to speed this process up. Please note the message on your draft page: "Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,667 pending submissions." 45.85.61.164 (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

14:22, 3 June 2023 review of submission by Martin821
Submission rejected on 3 June 2023 by Mcmatter (talk). Martin821 (talk) 14:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, it was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to tell the world about a company. 331dot (talk) 14:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

21:27, 3 June 2023 review of submission by Thenamemahi
I'm confused about the editing Thenamemahi (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Thenamemahi: that isn't a question; what would you like to ask? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)