Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 March 2

= March 2 =

06:03:26, 2 March 2023 review of submission by Marcosfv2020
Hi, I am trying to edit and create a company page for Filevine, and trying to model the page after Clio (Software Company), Here is a link to their page Clio (software company)

I have edited the page to removed any type of promotional language and write about it in a neutral language, but I keep getting flagged for promotional writing.

I have a theory it could be from the awards and the achievement section of the article, I am open to any suggestions.

Marcosfv2020 (talk) 06:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * We don't need the whole url when linking to another article or page on Wikipedia, simply place the title of the target page in double brackets like this, Joe Biden gives Joe Biden.
 * It's not always a good idea to use any random article as a model or guide, as the article you view could have problems that you would be unaware of. If you want to use other articles as a model, use those classified as good articles, which have been vetted by the community.
 * Wikipedia is not a place for a company to document its existence and tell of its activities. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. We aren't interested in what a company says about itself, or in its routine business activities, but in sources that on their own describe what is significant/important/influential about the company as they see it, not as the company sees it.
 * Awards typically do not contribute to notability unless there is an article about the awards itself(such as Academy Award or Nobel Peace Prize). Some of the awards you name are for company staff, not the company itself- and most of the ones about the company are frankly not particularly significant. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

07:27:18, 2 March 2023 review of submission by Nikarmazi
Hello this is about my submitted draft about the multifunctional space in gori called the art house it was declined yesterday and I have a question about it is the subject matter itself too insignificant to be accepted or can I revise my draft for it to be accepted?

Nikarmazi (talk) 07:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

07:44:29, 2 March 2023 review of submission by Gaurab17
After completion of the Draft Bishop W. C. Hunter and filling details in 'Articles for creation/Submitting', submission does not take place. Requesting for an assistance.

Gaurab17 (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * You need to click the "submit your draft for review" button on the screen; however, you should not submit it until you cite every substantive piece of information about this person; we have a strict policy about how living people are written about, please see WP:BLP. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you need help with referencing, see Referencing for Beginners. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

12:54:23, 2 March 2023 review of submission by Riittu patel
Riittu patel (talk) 12:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * @Riittu patel This is the English-language Wikipedia and articles here must be written in English. David10244 (talk) 12:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

13:18:35, 2 March 2023 review of submission by Nlyerea
So Im requesting a review because I need this article in sandbox approved I listed all the references, which was the issue to begin with and it seems fine now This mythology post is something Im looking forward to completing If there are any other issues please address them to me thanks Nlyerea (talk) 13:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 13:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

20:01:45, 2 March 2023 review of submission by Savagecrybaby
I just wanted to know why my article was rejected. They say that I need more sources that are secondary but all the sources that I cited were stats and there is not much info on this topic. There are no secondary sites that explain which countries are most popular, how many downloads, or other things like this. All I'm saying is that there are not enough sites for me to get a lot of information and it is going to be a small page. Savagecrybaby (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * An article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. If as you say there are not a lot of sources that discuss this game, it would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. 331dot (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

23:10:39, 2 March 2023 review of draft by Xschimmer
I will work on editing but I am wondering why the sources do not work to approve this- I used RollingStone and Iheart Radio, another band that he toured with Nightly, mostly has youtube, as sources and there page is up. Would I have a better chance if I listed a discography with youtube sources? I am happy to remove any sources that are causing issue, thank you for any guidance that can be provided!

Xschimmer (talk) 23:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Please see other stuff exists. The existence of other articles has no bearing on yours. It could be that these other articles you have seen are also inappropriate and you would not be aware of this. For example, YouTube is rarely acceptable as a source, usually only from news outlets on their verified channel.
 * Most of your sources do not seem to have significant coverage of the band, and just serve to document specific information. You need independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the band, coverage that goes into detail about it. The band needs to meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable band. 331dot (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)