Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 March 3

= March 3 =

01:17:57, 3 March 2023 review of draft by Die Kunst Der Fuge
Hi, I understand that this subject falls under multiple contentious topics (abortion and American politics), and would appreciate any help or advice.

Die Kunst Der Fuge (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Is there specific advice you are looking for? You have submitted the draft for a review. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

09:12:36, 3 March 2023 review of submission by Keshavdogra
He is working as general secretary of the national party, and his activities engage a lot of people from other parties as well as the general public. Kindly consider reviewing and making this page public. Keshavdogra (talk) 09:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * According to List of political parties in India, the party this man is the general secretary for is only active in one state. Most of the draft is unsourced, especially the parts describing his alleged influence. Engaging the general public is a normal part of the job of a party leader. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

13:01:38, 3 March 2023 review of submission by Rohnie D
I'm a little unsure as to what "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia" is supposed to mean, initially I was told it was rejected because of lack of references and as soon as I got the ref, this is the new reason. My Organization is a legitimate manufacturer of EVs and we really think we deserve a place on Wikipedia. Please guide me as to how to accomplish the same ASAP & without any trouble. Rohnie D (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * First, as a company representative, the Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing disclosure on your user page, I will provide you with instructions on how to do this on your user talk page.
 * You misunderstand what Wikipedia is. This is not a database of companies where mere existence warrants inclusion. This is an encyclopedia with criteria for inclusion, which we call notability- such as the definition of a notable company.  Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves and what they do.  A Wikipedia article about a company must show how the company meets our definition of notability through summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about it.  We are not interested in press releases, announcements of routine business activities, brief mentions, and the like. We want to know what others completely unaffiliated with the business choose on their own to say about it and the significance or influence of the business. Company representatives usually have great difficulty in editing as Wikipedia requires, as they must set aside everything they know about the company.  Please read conflict of interest. The draft was rejected, and won't be considered further at this time. 331dot (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

15:19:45, 3 March 2023 review of submission by Nlyerea
Rereview my submission Nlyerea (talk) 15:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Your submission is completely unsourced, which is why it was rejected and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 15:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

16:04:40, 3 March 2023 review of draft by SayeedMollik
SayeedMollik (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @SayeedMollik you do not ask a question but your draft is not yet submitted for review. Even so, it does not appear to meet the notability and sourcing guidelines.  Mere announcements about a newspaper launching is not enough so appears to be WP:TOOSOON.  Please also see Your first article.  S0091 (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

16:46:46, 3 March 2023 review of draft by DRS311
DRS311 (talk) 16:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Would appreciate any help with writing this art. Queen Elizabeth I visted 3 times within 7 years. The Althams lived here for 200 years. Then also the Arkwrights, credited as the driving force behind the development of the spinning frame. And in the 1890s, The manor house was let it to the Gilbey family who remained in occupation until the death of Newman Gilbey in 1942. The house then became a hostel for the Women's Land Army until it burned down in 1947; a small part of the house which survived the fire was used for educational purposes until the late 1950s, but was finally demolished in 1960; the stable block was converted into a museum by Harlow Council in 1981. https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/essex/vol8/pp186-195 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rchme/essex/vol2/pp145-149 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/essex/vol2/pp154-155 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/essex/vol8/pp110-112 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rchme/essex/vol2/plate-67 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rchme/essex/vol2/plate-68 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rchme/essex/vol2/plate-46#:~:text=Chair%3B%2017th%2Dcentury.-,Latton,-Church.%20Monument%20to https://landedfamilies.blogspot.com/2014/04/118-altham-of-mark-hall-oxhey-place-and.html https://landedfamilies.blogspot.com/2015/06/173-arkwright-of-mark-hall-parndon-hall.html

https://archive.org/details/arkwrightsharlow0000lake https://archive.org/details/bookofharlowillu0000jone

19:41:10, 3 March 2023 review of draft by Per W
I have got three notices that an article requires sources that are: The article has 8 references from 5 different sources. At least 7 of them are long enough to be in-depth, especially for such a clandestine organisation. Joakim von Braun seems to be reliable as he has followed the Soviet Union and Russia for decades. I do not know much about the others. The references are mostly secondary, some can be tertiary. The Westeners should be independent of the subject.
 * in-depth,
 * reliable,
 * secondary and
 * independent.

Thus, I would like to have concrete pieces of advice on how to improve the draft.

Per W (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure that the draft is getting there, but only minor improvements were made from the last time it was declined. Tails   Wx  21:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your answer, ! The problem is that I do not know what should be added in order to move it to the article space. Now, it has some basic information and sources. As a secret military organisation, it is difficult to find stuff. Per W (talk) 06:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hm. Have you tried finding non-English sources? I would also go ahead and expand the draft as well! Tails   Wx  13:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * First of all, what kind of sources are lacking in order to show the notability?
 * Secondly, I have found two Russian sources and one Swedish one.
 * Thirdly, what is missing in the draft? Per W (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Resubmitted with some more references (actually not so many new sources since some refer to book by Joakim von Braun). Per W (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * With due respect, I want to state that I was a probationary reviewer and just removed from the AFCH. If I had to review that draft, first question in my consideration would have been occurred that there are 5 offline references and how an AFC reviewer can afford offline books given as reference! Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

19:52:04, 3 March 2023 review of submission by 59.103.110.196
59.103.110.196 (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * No question given, draft rejected, IP might want to read WP:SHOUT! Tails   Wx  03:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

21:30:04, 3 March 2023 review of submission by Innerharmony4u
I am writing a biography on an author who has published over 20 books, that I listed in the biography section of the article. but I was rejected because it was not neutral and verifiable. Should I link each book to where it is published, or an Amazon listing? Thank you for any help!

Innerharmony4u (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Innerharmony4u most of the content is unsourced and sources provided are primary and/or not independent (affiliated with her or interviews/her comments). What is needed is in-depth coverage about her from multiple secondary and independent reliable sources.  S0091 (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome - thank you! 174.130.96.5 (talk) 15:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

22:56:41, 3 March 2023 review of draft by Yorkmich23
Yorkmich23 (talk) 22:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm having a very hard time publishing Draft: Evan Winiker as it states there's not enough credible sources. However, I've cited articles and facts published my Billboard.com, Variety, and Reuters.com. Can you please advise?


 * Hi ! After taking a quick look, it looks like some of the sources in the draft are unreliable, including Discogs. I'll update when I'm done reviewing the draft! Tails   Wx  23:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Posted on your talk page, ! Tails   Wx  23:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help with this. I'd be happy to remove that as I thought that was a reliable source. Any other advice would be greatly appreciated. Yorkmich23 (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

23:22:38, 3 March 2023 review of submission by Curtmarsalis
Curtmarsalis (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Consideration for draft approval: Please revisit article for submission. Kandiid is a verifiable application that is available on iOS and Android. Since 2021, the application is rising in popularity with a 7% market share of social media platforms next to Twitter, Instagram and TikTok. The reference sources added are verifiable and without bias. The platform owner has feature on Forbes and international music star Soulja Boy is minority owner of the application. The included draft has been modified to include only the formation and current history that is verifed by references.