Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 March 5

= March 5 =

How do i find a more reliable source then the place itself
Hello, recently my draft was declined saying it needed for reliable source. Can anyone please help https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:St_Charbel%27s_College,_Punchbowl Randomeditor123218 (talk) 06:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

07:43:27, 5 March 2023 review of submission by YollaHalal
+

Hi, we at Manara University are requesting assistance in order to make our university page eligible and meets your conditions. YollaHalal (talk) 07:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * zero indication that the topic passes WP:NCORP and it is written like an advertisement. This is not a place to promote your university. Theroadislong (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

09:25:24, 5 March 2023 review of submission by Ckamani
I have recently joined this company that has employees of over 200 in 4 countries. YoY revenue is ~$25 Million yearly. I never knew of this company before and personally I felt skeptical that this could be one of those scams to loot money which many of my colleagues had similar experience as we did not knew if this company is legit. Putting this up on Wiki would bring that trust that its not fake.

Here is the website: https://www.brickendon.com/ Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/company/brickendon-consulting?originalSubdomain=in

PS: I am not paid to do this, nor I have any monetary benefit from listing this on Wiki. Its for a greater good (which is what I feel wiki stands for) BUT if you look at my history I genuinely tried helping with edits but to my surprise everything I post gets rejected so maybe this is not for me to contribute.

Chintan Kamani 09:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Request on 10:47:20, 5 March 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by TrudiRose
Hello, I really need some assistance - I have been trying to do this for Colin for over a year. Can I ask for any specific tips and help? Can this draft go to someone else to finish please? I do want to admit defeat but I cannot do it. Thanks

TrudiRose (talk) 10:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Tone is totally inappropriate for an encyclopaedia, no evidence of passing WP:GNG and sources are not reliable or independent. Theroadislong (talk) 11:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

13:00:54, 5 March 2023 review of draft by Catboy628
Hello, I have a problem here, it is about my article was being refused again. it says my sources are not reliable, but all the sources are coming from newspapers and even in many international film events, this film director even got many rewards in Hong Kong and in other countries, I am so confused and frustrated and don't know what to do next...  is there anyone who can give me a hand on this, please? Much appreciated.

Catboy628 (talk) 13:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * First remove anything sourced to an interview, interviews are not reliable or independent. Theroadislong (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you,Theroadislong. I go try again tomorrow. Appreciate that. Catboy628 (talk) 14:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

16:33:45, 5 March 2023 review of draft by DoubleTimeDesire
Hello, I was making an article about the story of a man named Gleb Korablev, and it got declined because it does not qualify for a wikipedia article. I understand this decision but if its okay, can you specify what i specifically need to work on when it comes to improving the article and getting the backstory out there. There arent many references online without NSFW content so I believe i will work on getting more references. But besides that, what should i change about the article that will make it qualify?

DoubleTimeDesire (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * also, i removed all references from youtube as they claimed it is not a reliable source. the only references from youtube that i shared was the link to his performances and plays which have zero adult content in them whatsoever. me and my friends double checked every article to make sure that they didnt have any adult content in there either. i didnt want to mention it in the article because they said i should keep it neutral so my only option is to mention it here. its somewhat frustrating. also, since the incident happened in russia its extremely hard to find any solid evidence. there is alot of speculation behind what happened, and i made sure to mention that what i said is only speculation and may not be true, and i wanted to put as much detail into the article and information as possible. DoubleTimeDesire (talk) 16:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

18:56:41, 5 March 2023 review of submission by Tonyspumoni65
Tonyspumoni65 (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC) This is one of my friends and I think it would be funny for him to have a wiki page. Nobody else will ever see this page, so why does it matter if he isn't notable?


 * @Tonyspumoni65 I know this isn't what you will want to hear, but people need to be notable to warrant an article on Wikipedia. Saying "Nobody else will ever see this page, so why does it matter if he isn't notable" isn't a valid reason for inclusion. When they have ~3 reliable, independent and secondary sources proving notability, then maybe we can consider it. The draft has been rejected, and will not be considered further at this time.
 * Thanks, echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  01:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

OFFICIAL, 5 March 2023 review of submission by 120.21.82.104
120.21.82.104 (talk) 21:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The subject of the article has been established as not notable here. You haven't addressed the points brought up in any of the declines or Articles for deletion/Ramiz King. I would strongly advise that you take the advice given by @PK650: I would strongly suggest against resubmitting. The AfD plus all the decline templates and comments should give you an indication that several editors have disagreed with you when it comes to the subject's notability. This would clearly not survive another deletion discussion. Please stop and try to understand why you keep getting this declined, and perhaps try again in a few years' time if he garners more coverage.
 * Thanks, echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  01:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

22:28:21, 5 March 2023 review of submission by 2023JamesLeyInc.
I Want To Promote My Son's Website On Wikipedia 2023JamesLeyInc. (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * This is counterintuitive to the purpose of an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a place to promote anything. Please see What Wikipedia is not McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

22:59:07, 5 March 2023 review of submission by Jamiep1234
Jamiep1234 (talk) 22:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The article has now been deleted and salted as blatant advertising or spam, meaning you will not be able to create it again. Do not attempt to recreate it under a new name. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  09:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)