Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 May 21

= May 21 =

03:43, 21 May 2023 review of submission by 2601:282:1401:2430:91C0:E149:D664:7C21
Whats wrong in here, and why does it keep getting denied? Whats the problem 2601:282:1401:2430:91C0:E149:D664:7C21 (talk) 03:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The reason why this draft was declined and then rejected is that there is no evidence of notability, which is a core requirement for inclusion in Wikipedia. We need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * And please don't start multiple threads, you can just continue in the one already started. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

06:11, 21 May 2023 review of submission by 94.188.182.25
hey! This cannot be merged to the Raid: Shadow Legends page, since this page is about a video game. And the current article that we would like to publish is TV Series. 94.188.182.25 (talk) 06:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Alright, fine; the reviewer was merely suggesting that since this doesn't seem notable in its own right, it could be included in the game article. Add sources that demonstrate notability according to the WP:GNG standard, and then (and only then) resubmit. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

07:11:16, 21 May 2023 review of draft by Mickey Singh Narula
Mickey Singh Narula (talk) 07:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question for us to help you with, and your sandbox only has the base article template without any text from you. 331dot (talk) 07:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

09:19, 21 May 2023 review of submission by StriveMe
We are a well known magazine in the middle east, this is not a spam account for promotional purposes , yet we need to be on wikipedia like all magazines StriveMe (talk) 09:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @StriveMe: firstly, this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further; moreover, it is promotional, and hence awaiting speedy deletion.
 * Secondly, while you may feel that you "need to be on wikipedia", we have policies and guidelines that govern inclusion, and the subject's desire doesn't feature on any of them. There may one day be an article on your magazine, but only if it can be shown to be notable, which based on this draft isn't the case. And even then, you shouldn't really be writing that article.
 * ...which brings me to my 'thirdly': you have an obvious conflict of interest (COI) and you are likely editing for pay or other compensation, and you must disclose that as your very next edit. I have posted a message on your talk page with instructions. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, and then there's that. (Blocked.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

13:33, 21 May 2023 review of submission by Mathews Kantchembere
to publish my post Mathews Kantchembere (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @Mathews Kantchembere: oh yes, I remember this. :)) I just looked at it quickly and thought it was a book outline, so marked it as promotional (sorry!). Luckily the attending admin sensibly declined my speedy deletion request. Anyway, we already have an article on World War II, so feel free to improve that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

16:21, 21 May 2023 review of submission by 2605:BA00:4138:445:1974:CACD:E09D:A640
I, sorry 2605:BA00:4138:445:1974:CACD:E09D:A640 (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected (and you probably know why) and therefore won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

20:23, 21 May 2023 review of submission by Adamozito
Why is rejected? It's a type of machine present in almost all wood boards plants as the reference shows. Adamo Zito 20:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * As stated in the rejection notice, "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia". The draft does little more than document the existence of the topic, it does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the topic. This is why it was rejected, and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)