Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 May 28

= May 28 =

14:00, 28 May 2023 review of submission by Michael Mike Macapagal
is the information not enough ? Michael Mike Macapagal (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). All content claims should be sourced and please if you continue do so on the first copy Draft:Michael Ted Macapagal. KylieTastic (talk) 14:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

15:38:50, 28 May 2023 review of draft by 154.126.9.227
154.126.9.227 (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't ask a question, and your edit history under this IP only shows one previous edit, the creation of Draft:Manley Jeoffrey which is blank apart from the template. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

20:25, 28 May 2023 review of submission by Hoshya george harvey
Reliable sources Could you tell me in a more understandable way what reliable resources are Hoshya george harvey (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Hoshya george harvey the best sources have no affiliation to the subject, have editorial oversight and a history of fact-checking, such as a reputable newspaper. I see one of the issues with the draft is much of the content is unsourced such as the section about the school houses.  If no reputable sources exist to support that content then remove it, same with the other unsourced content.  An encyclopedia article should only summarize what reliable sources have written about a subject.  S0091 (talk) 20:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hmm,understood thank you for taking your time to reply. Hoshya george harvey (talk) 02:56, 3 June 2023 (UTC)