Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 November 11

= November 11 =

03:50, 11 November 2023 review of submission by Citizen arindam
I have used reliable news report's ( from famous Indian news platforms & newspapers like NDTV, Hindustan Times) but I don't understand why the article cannot be published. And also I have a pdf about the organisation from the Ministry of Health and Welfare West Bengal, India Citizen arindam (talk) 03:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Citizen arindam, thanks for reaching out. 2 sources is not enough. Usually, you need at least 3 pieces of non-promotional, in depth coverage. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

11 November 2024 Major League Baseball season
Can you please fix the error i made on 2024 Major League baseball references please. 98.186.55.18 (talk) 04:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * This help desk is for drafts going through the AfC review process. The article you mention is already published. In any case, if you can edit to make an error, I'm sure you can also "fix" it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey:DoubleGrazing Can you fix the error i made about ron washington being hired as angels Manager please. 98.186.55.18 (talk) 20:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * As noted, this is not the place to ask this. The best place to ask is the article talk page(Talk:2024 Major League Baseball season) if you are unable to fix it yourself. 331dot (talk) 21:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

04:36, 11 November 2023 review of submission by Vinraj123
I could not able to remove a part of references mentioned at the bottom of the draft article. Please help me to remove the all the references so that I can paste the correct ones in order. Vinraj123 (talk) 04:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Vinraj123: you can remove the first 14 manually-created (which you shouldn't do anyway) 'references' just by normal editing. The other ten are created automatically from the inline citations you've made, and need to be deleted one by one from the body text where they are referenced. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

14:10, 11 November 2023 review of submission by 2A00:23C5:2887:6401:61CE:B890:6847:A3FB
Hello, Instead of opting for a whole page dedicated to Astronism which I understand might be premature at this stage, would perhaps a brief mention of Astronism on the page Astronomy and spirituality be more appropriate? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomy_and_spirituality Or perhaps the page Astronomy and religion - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomy_and_religion Since Astronism is presented as a religion focused on astronomy, inclusion in one of these pages may be more appropriate due to insufficient notability for a whole page dedicated to Astronism. This may be appropriate as these two page listed have not included any contemporary examples of interaction between astronomy, religion and spirituality from what I've read. I look forward to hearing your thoughts. Kind regards. 2A00:23C5:2887:6401:61CE:B890:6847:A3FB (talk) 14:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I've added a section to the Astronomy and spirituality page just to see what people think instead of giving Astronism its own page which seems inappropriate at this stage. Let me know your thoughts. 2A00:23C5:2887:6401:61CE:B890:6847:A3FB (talk) 14:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I would just like to apologise for my earlier rejection which was rightly undone as an error. This came from an inherent bias I have against new age religious movements. I'll recuse myself from getting involved in this draft and the contents.  Qcne  (talk)  15:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

15:11, 11 November 2023 review of submission by 80.180.135.200
to the administrators who want to help an 85-year-old artist whose draft of my artistic activity was blocked and eliminated while awaiting publication, I ask for the restoration and publication of my activity given to culture for over 50 years. Thanks Gaetano Minale 80.180.135.200 (talk) 15:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, as already explained by the administrators you have been in touch with, there is more to this issue than simply restoring the deleted article, which in any case isn't something we can even do here at the help desk (with the exception of the few administrators who regularly patrol this forum). Sorry, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

16:47, 11 November 2023 review of submission by Xehadkabir
Submission rejected message was "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." how can i make it sufficient. Xehadkabir (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Xehadkabir you can't, that's why it has been rejected. The draft will not be considered further.  Qcne  (talk)  16:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

16:52, 11 November 2023 review of submission by 14.98.204.11
Can I know the things to be done 14.98.204.11 (talk) 16:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * No things are to be done, as this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

20:11, 11 November 2023 review of submission by Thewikicolumnist
I don't understand why my article was rejected. Please advice me on steps to be taken to improve and submit my article. Thank you. Thewikicolumnist (talk) 20:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Thewikicolumnist your draft was declined, not rejected. Did you read the decline notice which specifically explains what was wrong with the draft? It is not written in a tone that is acceptable for Wikipedia. Please re-write this in a way that complies with our strict WP:NPOV guideline.  Qcne  (talk)  20:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Thewikicolumnist the entire draft is promotional starting with "Mohammed Rashed Farazuddin's political journey began with a strong commitment to addressing the concerns and issues of the people in the Shaikpet Division. He gained recognition for his grassroots approach to problem-solving and his dedication to improving the living conditions and infrastructure in his constituency." Just simply state when he entered politics, dry facts, nothing more and also remove the Challenges and Achievements section.  See also WP:Words to watch.  S0091 (talk) 20:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

21:56, 11 November 2023 review of submission by Chicano Culture
This has been rejected once for notoriety. Another for lack of sourcing content, but the articles that would qualify appear to be ignored since the turnaround time between the rejection and read time for them is lower than the timing behind the rejection. Chicano Culture (talk) 21:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It was declined, not rejected. "Rejected" would mean resubmission was not possible. It was declined because notability(not notoriety, which has a more negative connotation) was not demonstrated. See WP:BAND. 331dot (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

22:59, 11 November 2023 review of submission by Fyathens
Hello there, I wonder what is the specific reason it rejected again. Fyathens (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The draft has been deleted as blatant promotion. 331dot (talk) 23:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

23:05, 11 November 2023 review of submission by Yevrowl
Please help me improve the article... or point out what is currently not exactly consistent with being posted on Wikipedia. Yevrowl (talk) 23:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The last reviewer already answered this question. This is the end of the line for this draft. 331dot (talk) 23:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)