Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 November 2

= November 2 =

00:01, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Tashialala
Regarding references Tashialala (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * May I have advice on the press release references? I can also find other Wikipedia articles using many press release sources. Tashialala (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read other stuff exists; the existence of inappropriate content does not mean more inappropriate content may be added. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate content to get by us. We can only address what we know about.
 * Press releases may be used on occasion for some purposes, but never to establish notability. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company), showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. You have only described the routine activities of the company.
 * If you work for this company, the Terms of Use require that to be declared, see WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

01:01, 2 November 2023 review of submission by 65.92.207.113
I would like to request help with disclosing that I am a paid editor. I thought I had followed the instructions but the reviewer said that it wasn't there. Does the paid editor disclosure go on the article or my user page? Thank you for your time. 65.92.207.113 (talk) 01:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I think you forgot to log in before posting. You should place the disclosure on your user page. 331dot (talk) 01:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

10:42, 2 November 2023 review of submission by 185.169.74.90
Hello! This draft was rejected because of unadequate reliable sources. I was wondering more specifically what this is referring to? Many parts are clearly referenced with links to different sources. Which parts are problematic? Is it a problem that some sources are in Swedish?

I'm hoping to improve the draft and submit it again, because Professor Arrhenius is a very internationally known and distinguished philosopher within the field of population ethics, climate ethics and moral philosophy. 185.169.74.90 (talk) 10:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Sources can be in Swedish, they don't have to be in English.
 * I don't know if this is the reason the reviewer had in mind, but my issue with this draft is that there is information which isn't supported, eg. the DOB and the second half of the middle paragraph. You say "many parts are clearly referenced", but it should be that all parts are clearly referenced, especially as this is a draft on a living person (WP:BLP). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

12:05, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Aniruddh17895
Sorry but i have written summary wrong now i have written it right please publish this page Aniruddh17895 (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Your one line of text with no reliable sources has no chance at being an article, and was correctly rejected. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please read the autobiography policy.  Wikipedia is a place to summarize what independent reliable sources say about a person, not what they say about themselves, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person.  If you want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 12:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

12:18, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Alleycat1995
Hello! I am writing this because I was hoping that I could have some additional feedback with what meeting the requirements given in the rejection information would look like. The feedback that stood out to me was "Two solid sources from the same time period, but no obvious on-going coverage or impact." Can this please be expanded on? Thank you and have a good day! Alleycat1995 (talk) 12:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * You are lacking in reliable sources that discuss the use of this term. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

13:40, 2 November 2023 review of submission by FactsThatFlourish
Hi, I'd like to contain the section "Sources, notes and other references" in a grey box but can't figure out a way to do this. Any help would be much appreciated. Many thanks. FactsThatFlourish (talk) 13:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @FactsThatFlourish: why would you do that? Pretty sure that wouldn't be compliant with the WP:Manual of Style. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick reply. If it's not compliant, I'll simply leave it as it is FactsThatFlourish (talk) 14:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

15:45, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Tmedia12
This page is redirected on many media pages I have seen. Hence I tried to improve it but I think it didn’t worked. Subsequently need help to improve this article and get it reviewed. Thanks Tmedia12 (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Tmedia12: this draft was declined for lack of notability. The sources provide coverage of the various programmes, with only passing mentions of the company. We need to see significant coverage of the company itself, in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @DoubleGrazing hope you are well. I have revised the citations as per my knowledge. Added citations more specific about the company. Additionally can you help to improve the article? Just have a look and please let me know if its ready to be reviewed. I also noticed one major thing missing about this company about its Producer. His page is also not available on Wikipedia. Do you want me to create that? Will that support this article in more better way? Do let me know. Thanks Tmedia12 (talk) 17:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Tmedia12: if you feel you have adequately addressed the earlier decline reason(s), then you're welcome to resubmit the draft.
 * Having an article on the producer in no way affects the chances of this draft being accepted. In any case, if you mean Guroudev Bhalla, then there already exists a draft on him at Draft:Guroudev Bhalla. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

16:30, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Wisest Arab
Hello, i would like to ask for assistance on this biography. i tried to cut all the not reliable sources.. and it is still rejected, also i tried to rely on good and confident sources such as Scout.org.. i will be thankful if you can help me. thank you Wisest Arab (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Rejected means that there is nothing more that you can do- it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 16:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * What is your relationship with Mr. Abdulmonem? (since you took a picture of him) 331dot (talk) 16:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

17:12, 2 November 2023 review of submission by 77.39.234.178
Thank you for your response. It's indeed a wonderful feeling to contribute to the growth of this encyclopedia. I've made the modifications to the article based on your comment, "You've shown that The Fast Guide to Architectural Form is probably notable, but what about his other books?...." To begin, I've added information about the second book that holds scientific importance. I've corrected the article, but I'm unsure whether it has already been rejected or is still under review. I'd like to know if, in the event of rejection, I will receive further feedback to understand whether I haven't delved enough into the sources or if there's another reason. Additionally, if I'm making any mistakes in the publication process, I'd appreciate guidance on the correct path to follow, as I have several entries related to architecture that I'd like to contribute. In the meantime, thank you, and keep up the good work. 77.39.234.178 (talk) 17:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi IP, I am assuming you are the User George Taylor Bown? If so, please remember to sign into your account. You successfully resubmitted the draft so it is pending which may take some time but yes, if it is declined again you will get feedback. Likewise, if it is accepted you will be notified.  S0091 (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

17:15, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Daisy Dhakre
Please provide assistant to resolve the issue. Daisy Dhakre (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * There is nothing you can do, the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. 331dot (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

17:44, 2 November 2023 review of submission by SerenityCoxFan
Wondering what I keep doing wrong? SerenityCoxFan (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further; prior reviews must remain on the draft. You did not demonstrate that she passes the notability criteria, and your sources do not offer significant coverage of her.
 * What is your association with her, since you took a picture of her? 331dot (talk) 17:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

17:53, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Lj alta
The editor said that the submission wasn't notable since the source weren't the ones he/she provided as examples. However, looking at comparable pages The LaSallian and The Guidon, the sources are similar in nature. Lj alta (talk) 17:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * , an acceptable Wikipedia article summarizes what reliable sources that are entirely independent of the topic say about the topic. Your draft contains no such references to independent sources. As for the other articles, perhaps they should be deleted. Do not base your draft on poor quality articles. Cullen328 (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Lj alta: the sources are three cites of the publication's own website, and one of Scribd (which is user-generated), none of which contribute towards notability per WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

18:40, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Wearefromjersey
Hi, I wanted to reach out and see if I could get clarification - while I understand why my submission keeps getting denied, I can't help bring this to your attention. I have looked at other independent labels' Wikipedia sites as a reference as to what to correct and they have nearly the SAME reference sources and they are approved. Please refer to Fat Wreck Chords: Fat Wreck Chords You can also refer to Hopeless Records as well: Hopeless Records Please advise, thanks. Wearefromjersey (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * See other poor quality articles exist. Their own website’ interviews, press releases and Spotify are not independent sources, Facebook is not reliable. Theroadislong (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If that is the case, what is the protocol then to escalate to have these pages removed. All pages should follow the same guidelines. Wearefromjersey (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing poor quality sources in those articles though? You have used their own website’ interviews, press releases, Facebook and Spotify which are are not independent reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The preferred term is articles, not the broader "pages", this may affect your mindset. Please see Articles for Deletion to learn about how you can propose articles for deletion. I would highly advise you to learn more about Wikipedia guidelines like notability and sourcing before you attempt doing so, or you risk your requests being declined quickly. 331dot (talk) 19:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for your help, I think I realized what I'm doing wrong with the links running through their website. I will find and source the original interviews from the media sources directly and remove Facebook and Spotify as sources as well.  Thanks again for all the info! Wearefromjersey (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

19:18, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Mitch199811
Is there any way I can speed up the publishing process for articles with redirects. I am confident in that it is a fine article and have even gotten approval from a more experienced editor; the one thing slowing me down is that I don't know what to do with a redirect. ✶Mitch 199811  ✶  19:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * If you mean that you are confident that the draft would survive in mainspace, and you would move it there but for the existing redirect Hurricane Tammy, then you can request a Technical Move. See WP:RM. ColinFine (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

19:46, 2 November 2023 review of submission by IndieSaer
My draft submission for the lost synth-pop song "Everyone Knows That" was rejected without an explanation. Could you please explain to my why my submission was rejected? IndieSaer (talk) 19:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I fixed your link for proper functionality.(it lacked the "Draft:") The reviewer did leave a reason: "The topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia". 331dot (talk) 19:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the clarification. IndieSaer (talk) 19:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

21:54, 2 November 2023 review of submission by BooBoo314159
Hello,

The draft has been declined with the rationale that the cited sources are not enough to support the content of the article (WP:OR). But I believe all I wrote there can be found in these sources so I am confused.

Could someone help me identify what part is not supported by the sources I cite? Or maybe should I use the sources differently throughout the article?

Thank you for you help BooBoo314159 (talk) 21:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @BooBoo314159 Your first sport of call is to ask the reviewer who declined this. You have a right to understand their reasoning. If that fails, and it should not, please come back here, ideally to this thread, and add to it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

22:10, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Privinsathy
I need to create an article for my company. can help to create a good article. Privinsathy (talk) 22:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Privinsathy No, you do not.
 * If you are a staff member and have been instructed to create an article by your employer, please refer them to WP:PAID. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

22:42, 2 November 2023 review of submission by Skipharris
I am somewhat new to your processes. I am proposing to replace an existing page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Smith_(surgeon)) with new and more comprehensive material. I have saved my work as a draft and am editing the work now. Once I finalize the new material, how should I send it to you, specifically, how should I note that this is a proposed replacement for an existing entry? Thanks! Skipharris (talk) 22:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Skipharris Please do 'not submit this draft for approval. It will be declined with the firm suggestion that you merge it into the existing article.
 * Do you have a relationship, business or personal, with Smith? We need the answer to this question before further advice can be given 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it. I think. My only relationship with the long-deceased Dr. Smith is my upcoming 400-page biography on him. I was intending to improve your entry, not to promote the book. This is a great deal of work and I could use some advice on how to make it work for you. 2601:500:8784:5E50:7C97:B0C8:76C:34F4 (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

23:07, 2 November 2023 review of submission by 2600:1008:B0A7:F720:973:4B19:EED0:EE2D
Why is my page being denied ? I don't understand 2600:1008:B0A7:F720:973:4B19:EED0:EE2D (talk) 23:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Asking this, here, is your sole contribution. Question is an article. Draft:Question does not exist. More information please? 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)