Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 November 3

= November 3 =

00:08, 3 November 2023 review of submission by ReneOliver23
Please what else do I need to add ReneOliver23 (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Your draft was rejected, meaning it won't be considered further. You had no sources to establish notabiliyty. NotAGenious (talk) 05:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

00:23, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Madison.y
Hi my article has not been accepted, can anyone help me to correct it ? Madison.y (talk) 00:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Madison.y it seems many of the sources are interviews which are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. See also the notability guidelines for artists.  Generally for artists you need critical reviews of their work from reputable publications (ArtForum, major newspapers like the Los Angeles Times, etc.) or to demonstrate they have had solo shows at major galleries or museum, etc. S0091 (talk) 15:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

10:30, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Lin Htet Wah Wah
Notable Achievements: Hla Hla Win has achieved notable recognition and awards for her work in the field of education and social entrepreneurship. Her receipt of the Digital Innovation Award and the Netexplo Innovation Award is a testament to her significant contributions.

Impactful Education Reform: She has been instrumental in reforming the education system in Myanmar and Southeast Asian nations. Her pioneering use of augmented reality and virtual reality technologies to enhance learning experiences is groundbreaking and deserves acknowledgment.

Inspirational Journey: Hla Hla Win's personal journey, from her struggles as a student in the traditional Myanmar education system to her scholarship at Harvard University and subsequent entrepreneurial success, is an inspiring story that can motivate others.

Social Entrepreneurship: As the CEO of 360ed, she has demonstrated the potential of social entrepreneurship to create positive change in society. Her work showcases how innovative technologies can be harnessed for social impact.

Impact on a Vulnerable Population: Her efforts to continue providing education during challenging times, such as the military coup in Myanmar, demonstrate her unwavering commitment to serving vulnerable and underserved populations, particularly children in conflict areas.

Global Relevance: Hla Hla Win's work and mission extend beyond national borders, aligning with global trends in education and technology. Her ideas and solutions hold promise for improving education in other developing communities and countries worldwide.

Recognition by Reputable Organizations: Her acknowledgment by organizations like the World Economic Forum's Schwab Foundation and UNESCO reflects the international recognition of her contributions.

Educational Policy and Innovation: Hla Hla Win's academic background in educational policy and innovation, combined with her practical application of these concepts, makes her a notable figure in the field.

Documented Information: There is a significant amount of credible and verifiable information available about Hla Hla Win's life, achievements, and contributions, making her a suitable subject for a Wikipedia page.

Educational Resources: A Wikipedia page would serve as an educational resource, providing information about the innovative use of technology in education and the potential of social entrepreneurship to bring about change. Lin Htet Wah Wah (talk) 10:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Lin Htet Wah Wah: I don't see a question anywhere in that. In any case, this draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. It is also pending speedy deletion, and if you wish to contest that, you need to do that on the draft's talk page, as the attending administrator will not be looking here. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

10:42, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Stdedos
I don't understand what is the problem with my submission. It is a translation from https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astu_(Unix), with fixed links.

How can I get more reliable sources from a copyrighted material? Stdedos (talk) 10:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Stdedos. The French and English Wikipedias are different projects with different standards and guidelines. The English Wikipedia certainly has the most strict content criteria.
 * For articles about software, check WP:NSOFTWARE which explains what we need to see in a draft. Your draft has a single reference from blogspot, so it doesn't pass the notability requirements. May I suggest you add some of your article content to the existing Mr Robot article instead?  Qcne  (talk)  10:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The page I tried to translate is the only "crawled" reference that comes up when searching "astu" at Google (some 1.5y ago)
 * Current results look like this (https://pasteboard.co/fJiY7bNH18xv.png)
 * Naturally, a more-established domain to store knowledge makes it more worthy.
 * I am not sure what would make sense including in the main Mr. Robot page, from a small piece that "quickly" describes a fictional command. Stdedos (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Mm, sorry but Reddit, Twitter, YCombinator, Blogs etc and such don't count as reliable sources.
 * Perhaps this simply isn't a topic that is notable enough for Wikipedia.  Qcne  (talk)  11:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

11:01, 3 November 2023 review of submission by 2001:14BB:A0:2383:7A:628:2AFF:DD0B
I don't understand why my article keeps getting declined. I possibly need help with making it comply to Wikipedia's rules and standards or someone to explain which parts are not acceptable.

There already exists a few non-english articles of the same software (article) and other UML tools have their own article pages so it shouldn't be a problem to create one for this specific software also.

2001:14BB:A0:2383:7A:628:2AFF:DD0B (talk) 11:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * ps. Forgot to post this question as a logged in user. I haven't contacted the people who have declined the submission before, so I'll try that also. And it seems English wikipedia has stricter standards compared to most other languages. Tapioviina (talk) 11:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @Tapioviina. Yes indeed, the English Wikipedia has the strictest content guidelines. The other language are all separate projects with different guidelines and standards.
 * Looking at your draft, I would suggest the issue is that most of the sources used are WP:PRIMARY, with then some insignificant coverage in secondary sources (like installation tutorials). We would need to see significant coverage in multiple (usually at least three) secondary sources that are reliable and indepednent of the topic.  Qcne  (talk)  11:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

12:36, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Loreta Chilingaryan
Hi, my draft article has just been rejected. I want to know the reason of the rejection, so that I can improve it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:SARD_Anti-Cheat Loreta Chilingaryan (talk) 12:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Loreta Chilingaryan. Your article was declined, not rejected. Rejected means you wouldn't be able to re-submit. Your draft relies on two primary sources: we would need to see significant coverage in multiple (usually at least three) secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the software in order for this draft to pass the WP:NSOFTWARE guidelines.  Qcne  (talk)  13:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * okay, thank you very much for clarification Loreta Chilingaryan (talk) 13:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

12:38, 3 November 2023 review of submission by ParnassusAward
Dear Friends, Could you please help me to edit and submit an article about my favorite writer Valerian Markarov? I will highly appreciate your support. ParnassusAward (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @ParnassusAward. A few issues:
 * - you included copyrighted text in your draft. This is strictly prohibited and will likely lead to your draft being deleted. You must paraphrase or summarise the sources you use, do not copy them.
 * - you have zero references and no in-line citations. Biographies of living people must be fully sourced. See the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE.
 * - you have not proven that Valerian has passed the WP:NAUTHOR criteria. Only authors who pass that criteria may have an article written about them. You can prove notability by following the guidelines on that page.
 * - you have some tone issues, i.e. "recognizes talented, famous, and successful writers of the world, whose high-spirited, bright, and noble works promote the universal values that unite peoples and make our world better, such as humanism, peace, kindness, justice, and love" and "While his loving and caring mother taught her son lessons of kindness and morality, Valerian's father introduced him to the wonderful world of art and literature". This type of language is completely inappropriate for an encyclopaedia which must be written in a neutral, dry, voice. See WP:NPOV.
 * Hope that helps,  Qcne  (talk)  13:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

14:40, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Iamsekar
How can I insert the reliable source for this article Iamsekar (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Iamsekar: for advice on referencing, see WP:REFB. As for what you should be citing, this would be the source that has provided the information in question. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

18:07, 3 November 2023 review of submission by 223.123.6.22
Why this article is not approving or delayed to approved from Wikipedia Editors. 223.123.6.22 (talk) 18:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi IP, I declined the draft again. Please read through all the links provided in the gray box along with my comments.  S0091 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

18:08, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Dance27
why ? I added a citation. Dance27 (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It's just WP:SPAM?  Qcne  (talk)  18:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Usually multiple independent and reliable sources are needed. Regardless of sources, the page you have is blatantly promotional and would never be accepted as an article even if its subject met notability guidelines. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * it is not promotional at all. did you read it ? Dance27 (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It's written completely inappropriately, not at all suitable for Wikipedia.  Qcne  (talk)  18:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * what's so, "inappropriate", about ? I can fix it to make it acceptable. 184.99.59.14 (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You can't fix it, as the draft has been rejected and I will not consider it further.
 * o  Qcne  (talk)  18:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Language like "the story of how Lil GAT became a Christian Artist is amazing," is promotional. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * that's not promotional at all. it's telling my personal story. if you knew me, you would truly be amazed. 184.99.59.14 (talk) 18:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. ColinFine (talk) 11:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Do not re-submit. I have rejected. It will not be considered further.  Qcne  (talk)  18:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

18:16, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Aminulzisan
I want to publish this article but it's not being published for some reason can you tell me why please? Aminulzisan (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Aminulzisan I've rejected your draft because it is just spam. Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion. Just get a LinkedIn or something. The draft will soon be deleted.  Qcne  (talk)  18:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Lol why it's a biography of myself. And how others getting on Wikipedia isn't that promotion? Aminulzisan (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It is spam and will soon be deleted. Please go elsewhere to promote yourself.  Qcne  (talk)  18:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

19:03, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Llightex
Hi! I wanted to check to learn more about how I can improve this draft. The AfC request was declined because "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)." In the submission, I included several sources that were independent of the subject and included significant coverage of the article subject. Could you provide more guidance as to why those sources were insufficient and what kinds of sources / coverage would be better to add? Copying in case you have any insights as well! (thanks for your review) Llightex (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, my reasoning was as follows: the duplicate citations 2 and 4, along with 5 and 6, are non-independent, as they are published by the article subject's employer and thus fall under WP:COISOURCE. As for the others, citations 5 and 7 do not provide significant ccoverage, and citation 1 fails to meet WP:NBASIC—it has plagiarized text from the non-independent citations 2/4, which can be seen to have existed since 2020. Hope that helps. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Llightex (talk) 19:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

19:26, 3 November 2023 review of submission by Yeszzzz
Hello dear staffs, I want to ask you guys if you can check my draft and maybe submit it and make it an article please, because I give reliable cites and informations, and I’m trying to improve my nation, thank you. Yeszzzz (talk) 19:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Yeszzzz you have already resubmitted the draft so it is pending review which may take while. S0091 (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I know but will it be accepted this time because I’ve provided all the reliable and accurate informations. Yeszzzz (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You will discover the answer to that when a reviewer chooses to review the draft. Please be patient. ColinFine (talk) 11:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

20:08, 3 November 2023 review of submission by MagicN7
I'm wondering why this article has been declined. Do I just need more independent sources? MagicN7 (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @MagicN7. Articles about academics need to show that they pass the WP:NACADEMIC criteria. Are you able to prove that Jared passes one of the criteria in that link? If so, make a note on the article stating which he passes and resubmit. Or let me know which you think he passes here and I or another reviewer can have another look.  Qcne  (talk)  20:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you @Qcne. He does pass 3, and I'll give proof and resubmit. MagicN7 (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

20:32, 3 November 2023 review of submission by 223.123.1.80
I made more better to this article and made it simple to read.Please accept it. 223.123.1.80 (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The draft has been rejected so will no longer be considered. See also User talk:Nnn edits.  S0091 (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)