Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 October 15

= October 15 =

02:18, 15 October 2023 review of submission by Samchristie05
i need a assistance Samchristie05 (talk) 02:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The first reference says “404 Error: This page did not load properly” so fix that and you’re also going to need more than two references KingTheD (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

02:32, 15 October 2023 review of submission by DaRealSupaPablo
why did i not get accepted DaRealSupaPablo (talk) 02:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Because it had been sources KingTheD (talk) 04:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It has no sources KingTheD (talk) 04:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @DaRealSupaPablo: Wikipedia is not a place to promote your creations or to write about things you made up. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

02:57, 15 October 2023 review of submission by Midwesterngal
This has been sitting in draft for 2 months after re-working and adding additional resources that should be more substantial, along with an additional credit that has since aired since this whole thing started. I've double and triple checked tags to improve the odds of "speedy review" We're up to 10 sources, including some that required premium access to link to in order to provide "more substantive" material from archives. Midwesterngal (talk) 02:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You need add wiki project tags to get it reviewed faster. There’s a button for it above edit resources. KingTheD (talk) 04:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No, adding Wikiproject tags is unlikely to get it reviewed any faster. They will bring the draft to the attention of project members, and it's possible that some of those have reviewing rights, and it's possible that one of them might decide to review it, but that's about it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * In my experience they do make a difference. KingTheD (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you have a particular need for a speedy review? 331dot (talk) 09:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't have any particular need - other than there are smaller things I could continue to add, but I am not sure if they're going to help or not. I'm perplexed by the "line" that seems to exist for "notable" in terms of being famous enough. This is a particularly long career and looking at individuals that have won the linked comedy contests and who have wiki pages, it seems that having had a single random comedy special in the heydey of Comedy Central vs. being mentioned in multiple places on Wikipedia already for writing/hosting and several additional long-standing projects (including credited writing on major properties) gets to be rather muddied.
 * I am just trying to figure out how much more I should add - this was getting reviewed faster a few months ago vs. now, so that's also why I was wondering if I should do more. Midwesterngal (talk) 15:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * What is your question, @Midwesterngal?
 * As it states on the top of the draft, "Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,444 pending submissions waiting for review." -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

10:26, 15 October 2023 review of submission by Mehedi wikibio
He is one of the notable people in Mathbaria Upazila. It would be nice to see it reviewed again. I started contributing to Wikipedia a few days ago. This was my first registration. If you reject, then our hope is broken.

Tell me what to do without rejecting?

And how can I make it acceptable?

I will update it if necessary Mehedi wikibio (talk) 10:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Mehedi wikibio: this draft was rejected because the subject isn't notable enough to warrant inclusion, and there is nothing you can do to make a non-notable subject notable. My advice is to review the concept of notability, and especially the main notability guideline WP:GNG, so that you understand better what is required. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Is there a reliable source?
 * For example, he has an Amazon author page, which has many books. If he wasn't an author, would his name appear on the Amazon ebook author page?
 * A writer is not a remarkable person?
 * As a newbie, please do a little review without surprising me. Mehedi wikibio (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * He may be a remarkable person but the quality of my writing did not make him remarkable.
 * Please help me to update it Mehedi wikibio (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * As noted, there is nothing further that can be done. You will need to find another topic to edit about. 331dot (talk) 11:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I've read wp:gng and I don't understand why my registration was canceled even though the sources I provided are fairly reliable. I am getting frustrated by doing this without helping newbies on Vaire, I have been researching this registration for 2 months now. Now since this register is written by me there are many other registers which we update regularly same will update this too no problem bro. Wikipedia has many registers that have registered articles with only one or two invalid sources. And I gave my 10 sources and still it didn't work. And you have not done that means it will not happen. If this is the case, how do we move forward?
 * Take a look at us Mehedi wikibio (talk) 11:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * (Blocked.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

12:52, 15 October 2023 review of submission by 185.76.176.85
My wikipedia has been deleted 185.76.176.85 (talk) 12:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You (probably) don't have a "wikipedia". You appear to have created a draft for a Wikipedia article, which has been rejected, not deleted. Although saying that, now that I've looked at it, I will request that it is deleted. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * PS: Nah, on second thoughts, having seen the deletion etc. history of it, I won't bother requesting speedy. Just to say, though, that you're very close to getting blocked, so my advice to you is to stop trying to publish self-promo articles (such as they are), as this will not be allowed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

17:07, 15 October 2023 review of submission by LoLBruh
I would like to request the assistance of others, as I do not have much experience in creating Wikipedia pages, and feel it would be very difficult to create one mostly by myself.

Thanks! LoLBruh (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @LoLBruh. At the moment there is not any evidence that Molly passes our strict WP:NACTOR criteria or even the WP:NBASIC criteria, which means there can not be an article at this time. I've Googled her and can find a few interviews, but it is mostly trivial mentions of her in cast announcements which simply isn't enough to base a Wikipedia article on.
 * Perhaps if Molly progresses in her career and she receives significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources, then you can try again with this draft?  Qcne  (talk)  17:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback! LoLBruh (talk) 01:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

18:12, 15 October 2023 review of submission by Cedric.plab
Hello, (I m a newby in wikipedia) i did a mistake when submitting "Draft:Graphique_Kagi" which was intended to be a translation in french of the original "Kagi Chart" page in english. A reviewer named Phuzion suggested me to move it to french wikipedia. I haven t been able to find a way to do so. Could you help me ? Cedric.plab (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Cedric.plab: you need to go to the French-language Wikipedia and submit it there. Each language version is completely separate, and we cannot 'migrate' content from one to another. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

18:42, 15 October 2023 review of submission by Black0kamHenry
I need a bit of help, please. This article was rejected because of, not enough independent sources. Fair! I didn't include multiple sources for a lot of the content because I wrongly assumed it would be redundant. And a couple sources misgender for Sherred, so I excluded those, too. My question: would including those multiple sources for the same sentences/paragraphs fix the issues? How do we deal with sources that misgender the subject? Black0kamHenry (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The draft was declined, not rejected. Rejected has a specific meaning here, that a draft may not be resubmitted. Declined means that a draft may be resubmitted.
 * See MOS:GENDERID for guidance on how to handle gender for a transgendered person.
 * You don't necessarily need multiple sources, you need to summarize the independent sources- sources that are associated with the person shouldn't be used ro establish notability. 331dot (talk) 22:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)