Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 October 2

= October 2 =

06:02, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Sportsik1998
Ok Sportsik1998 (talk) 06:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Sportsik1998; that's not a question; do you have one in mind you'd like to ask? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

08:22, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Talhabaig1211
Why is my article not being published? What is missing in it? Talhabaig1211 (talk) 08:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Talhabaig1211: because there is no sign of notability, the draft is promotional, and in any case you shouldn't be writing about yourself (see WP:AUTOBIO). This draft has been rejected and is pending deletion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * , overtly promotional language like "renowned" and "Ethical Hacker" and "widely recognized" and "significant strides" and "a prominent place in the global cybersecurity community" and "deep curiosity " and "honed his skills" and "establishing himself as a prominent figure" is utterly unacceptable language for a neutrally written encyclopedia. Promotion of any kind is forbidden on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

10:14, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Pankajwill
This page is not unambiguously promotional because it provides a balanced and factual representation of Dr. Bhaskar Dwivedi's life and career, highlighting both his achievements and contributions to various fields, rather than solely focusing on promotional content. Pankajwill (talk) 10:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Pankajwill you had zero sources, and re-submitted without providing any sources three times. This is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Please very carefully read WP:VERIFY.  Qcne  (talk)  10:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Your draft was completely unsourced and was promotional in nature- Wikipedia is not a place to post someone's resume, but a place to summarize what independent reliable sources state about a person and what makes them notable. This is why your draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

10:17, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Gogo1479
why isnt it suitable Gogo1479 (talk) 10:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Please read the messages left by reviewers. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Your draft has been rejected because it fails to show that this person is notable. Cullen328 (talk) 10:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

11:27, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Charlie Rosenbaum
Hi there,

Hope you are doing well. I submitted an article for review and the did not approved it. I am not sure what to write the article right way and resubmit it. Please help me to write and resubmit the article.

Kindly Charlie Rosenbaum (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Charlie Rosenbaum: firstly, please see WP:AUTOBIO for all the reasons why you shouldn't be writing about yourself.
 * If you still plan to go ahead, then see WP:GNG for the main notability guideline, which your draft must meet in order to be accepted. Basically, this requires significant coverage in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject.
 * See also WP:BLP for the referencing etc. rules applicable to articles on living people. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

11:46, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Origagari
Hi,

Why do you reject this biographical article? Seyidullah Nebati is a well-known businessman. Can you please let me know if I have done anything wrong?

Good Work. Origagari (talk) 11:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Please see the messages left by reviewers. 331dot (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * In addition, note that autobiographical articles are highly discouraged, please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

16:01, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Naniu9hei
Can you please confirm if the submission is still under review? If there are any other requirements, please let me know. Thanks in advance for your time and consideration Naniu9hei (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The draft is still pending, as indicated. 331dot (talk) 16:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your prompt reply Naniu9hei (talk) 03:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

17:34, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Record straighter setter
 Can you please instruct me how to change my article established in German Wiki to get accepted in English - thanks a lot for your assistance! Record straighter setter (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Record straighter setter: you need to show that the subject is notable by either the WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC standard, and also to make sure that pretty much everything you say is supported by inline citations to reliable published sources. (And just for clarity, whether or not this is "established in German Wiki" is irrelevant in what comes to its prospects for being accepted into the English-language Wikipedia.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

18:41, 2 October 2023 review of submission by HAMZJAHANZEB
I am wanting to ask if I have enough sources here to back claims. There are lots of references, and I wanted to ensure that I do not get rejected on that basis.

Can you kindly provide me with some feedback?

Very best, HAMZJAHANZEB (talk) 18:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @HAMZJAHANZEB: I'm not quite sure what you're asking. This draft was declined for inadequate referencing. You haven't since made any improvements, yet you're asking if you have enough references. No; self-evidently, you don't. You are citing three sources, with four citations in total. I would not call that "lots of references" by any measure. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

21:50, 2 October 2023 review of submission by CodesonCanvas
Page declined Why did my page submission get declined? CodesonCanvas (talk) 21:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It has no independent sources, is blatant advertising and zero indication of notability. Theroadislong (talk) 21:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

21:58, 2 October 2023 review of submission by Mronzon
Hello! Been trying to get this article approved for quite some time, any help would be greatly appreciated. It keeps getting rejected because of the validity of the sources, but all sources included are from reputable sites. Mronzon (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The draft was declined, not rejected. Rejected has a specific meaning here, that a draft may not be resubmitted; declined means it may be resubmitted.
 * The validity or reputability of the sources is not the issue, their content is the issue. The draft must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about him; you have largely just documented his activities. 331dot (talk) 23:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. So what edits would you suggest making so that the draft has a better chance of being approved? Pull more direct quotes from the sources? Mronzon (talk) 18:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)