Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 October 7

= October 7 =

05:14, 7 October 2023 review of submission by ZeroMag
Congratulations!

I am the author of the draft of the article about Kostyantyn Vitaliyovych Nemichev. On October 5, 2023, user LJF2019 declined the right to publish the draft with the following explanation: "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." In previous times, the publication was rejected due to incorrect design of links, but now this problem has been solved. Instead, the reason given by user LJF2019 is subjective and defies logic. After all, in the English Wikipedia there is an article about the special unit "Kraken", so there must also be an article about its commander. In this regard, please reconsider the decision. ZeroMag (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @ZeroMag: this draft has been rejected, and will therefore not be considered further.
 * And just for the record, it absolutely does not follow that simply because there is an article on a unit, there "must also be" an article on the person commanding it. Each topic must be demonstrably notable in its own right, as notability is not inherited, and this topic has not been shown to be notable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

05:53, 7 October 2023 review of submission by Janakjk21
I trust this message finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to seek assistance regarding an article submission I made on September 27th. I am eager to ascertain if my submission has been successfully received and if it is in the queue for review.

On the mentioned date, I submitted an article and sought assistance for its review and refinement to ensure its adherence to formal and high-quality standards. However, I am uncertain about the status of my submission and whether it has been assigned for review.

Given the urgency and importance of this matter, I kindly request your prompt attention to this inquiry. I am eager to ensure that my article is in the review process, and any guidance or feedback to enhance its quality is highly valued.

Your prompt response regarding the status of my submission will be greatly appreciated Janakjk21 (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Janakjk21: as you can see, it says on top of the draft, "Review waiting, please be patient". So yes, you have submitted it correctly, and it is pending review (not in a 'queue', rather a pool, but still).
 * What is the "urgency" you mention? Wikipedia is not edited to a deadline. Please understand that a review may take days, weeks or even months. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear @DoubleGrazing
 * Thank you for promptly addressing my concerns regarding the review status of my submitted article and providing valuable insights into the review process on Wikipedia.
 * I appreciate your clarification about the absence of strict deadlines for edits and reviews on Wikipedia, helping me grasp the dynamic nature of the process.
 * In response to your mention of the ongoing "pool" for article review, I'm intrigued to learn more about its purpose and the potential ways I can contribute or assist. Understanding how I can positively impact the Wikipedia community is of great interest to me, and any guidance you can offer in this regard would be highly valuable.
 * Your dedication to maintaining Wikipedia's quality and standards is truly commendable. Please feel free to share further details or suggestions on how I can actively participate in this community-driven endeavor.
 * Looking forward to hearing from you soon. Janakjk21 (talk) 06:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you writing with the aid of an AI bot? 331dot (talk) 08:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

06:20, 7 October 2023 review of submission by Lalit sharma 11
It is requested to guide me about furnishing the required evidences, certificates or any other details in this Wikipedia page written by me. I am ready to submit all the evidences, certificates and details? Lalit sharma 11 (talk) 06:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Lalit sharma 11: this draft was deleted as promotional.
 * If you wish to try again, start at WP:YFA, where you will find everything you need. And please revise WP:PROMO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

08:13, 7 October 2023 review of submission by Afzanj
Hi, I try to bring this article up by googling it but for some reason google brings up the talk: page rather than the article. Can someone advise on how we can get the article to pop up rather than the talk: page? Afzanj (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * This page is for asking help with drafts in the Articles for Creation process- in the future you may use the more general Help Desk.
 * To answer you, new articles must be marked as reviewed by a New Pages Patroller before Google can index them, both of which take time. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

10:43, 7 October 2023 review of submission by Garoullogistics
but why Garoullogistics (talk) 10:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Garoullogistics: "but why" what? Why was this rejected? For the reason given in the rejection notice, namely that the subject is not notable enough to warrant inclusion. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a social media site. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

11:46, 7 October 2023 review of submission by WNJCA
Entry declined I have written a genuine entry about someone in the public domain and it has been declined. How can I edit with assurance that it will not be declined a 2nd time. WNJCA (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You asked this at The Teahouse where it has been responded to. Wikipedia and IMDb are not reliable sources and will need to be replaced and content like "JoJo's DNA is rich in fame, with every twist and turn of his family tree being star studded with success." is laughably inappropriate for an encyclopaedia. Theroadislong (talk) 11:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

12:18, 7 October 2023 review of submission by Yigit.kilicaslan
I am trying to add an article about an academic non-profit journal that high-authority research organizations like Research Papers in Economics acknowledge. But is marked as not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I think this is not true. What can I do next? Yigit.kilicaslan (talk) 12:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Yigit.kilicaslan: this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. If you have new evidence available which wasn't considered previously, you may try appealing directly to the reviewer who rejected this, but you will need actual evidence, not just saying you disagree with the review (or rather reviews, by three different reviewers). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

13:48, 7 October 2023 review of submission by Vancouveright
Although this (my first draft Wikipedia article) was reviewed and approved two days ago, when I search for the subject on Google the Wikipedia article is not among the Google results. Why is that? Have I omitted a step in making it a full-fledged article?

(Note that the article does appear when searched for within Wikipedia.) Vancouveright (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Vancouveright: new articles are not indexed by the search engines until they have been reviewed by New Page Patrol, or 90 days have passed since publication, whichever comes first. This article has not yet been patrolled. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

15:03, 7 October 2023 review of submission by TheShubh77
Hi, I received a decline notification for this Wikipedia draft today. I believe I've addressed the reliability issues with the sources and have resubmitted the draft. Hoping for approval this time. TheShubh77 (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You have resubmitted the draft and it is pending. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, hoping for approval this time. TheShubh77 (talk) 15:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay. No further action is needed from you until it is reviewed. 331dot (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

15:18, 7 October 2023 review of submission by LukkuWayanad
I created a page about a valid, famous person from Kerala and why it was declared LukkuWayanad (talk) 15:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @LukkuWayanad: it was declined, because there is no evidence that this person is notable by either WP:GNG or WP:FILMMAKER standards. "Valid" and "famous" are not notability criteria. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

19:03, 7 October 2023 review of submission by TheShubh77
Hi, I have submitted a new article draft. Could you please take a look at it? TheShubh77 (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Asking on this page for a review is unlikely to lead to a quick review. As noted on your draft, "This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,435 pending submissions waiting for review"- every one of those 3,435 or so authors would love for their draft to be reviewed next. Please be patient- once you submit a draft, nothing further is required. 331dot (talk) 19:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @TheShubh77: just so you know, you don't need to announce your submissions here on the help desk, we will pick them up as and when. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it! TheShubh77 (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)