Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 September 10

= September 10 =

08:02, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Dermacorrect11
How can i Approve this Article Dermacorrect11 (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Dermacorrect11: this draft has been rejected and will not therefore be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Request on 08:07:10, 10 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Harshrane21
Harshrane21 (talk) 08:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Harshrane21 It was deleted as a copyright infringement and as advertising, as your user talk page tells you. You have also been warned there against auditing promotional material 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

09:43, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Averus19
I have made some changes regarding the lack of notability in the previous draft, can my changes be reviewed and hopefully verified. Averus19 (talk) 09:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Averus19: this draft was rejected and won't therefore be reviewed again. If sources are now available which establish notability, you can make your case directly to the reviewer who rejected it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * PS: I have posted a query on your talk page about paid editing, please respond to it. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

11:13, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Malayalamauthor1
Hi everyone, I’m trying to create a page and it’s getting declined. I have cited the reference from the various indian medias to support the texts (the cited links include times of India special feature about the person in the article and the remaining links are in our Native language malayalam). Please help me to complete the submission Malayalamauthor1 (talk) 11:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Malayalamauthor1: to establish notability per WP:GNG, the sources must be independent and reliable, and provide significant coverage of the subject. Of the three sources, the first has the subject commenting on something, the second is an interview, and the third a book review, none of which meet the GNG standard.
 * BTW, what is your relationship to Mannarkkad? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

13:04, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Naniu9hei
my submission was declined on September,8 but I have since updated it. Can you confirm if the submission is still under review? Thank you for your time and attention Naniu9hei (talk) 13:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * As the notice on the draft indicates, you have successfully resubmitted it. 331dot (talk) 13:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

14:10, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Millicentatasie
Hello, Everyone My recent publication was rejected because I included the references from a press release. But that's the only reference I have that talks about DivVerse. Is there any other way I can published an article by citing references about the terms used in the article.. Millicentatasie (talk) 14:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Millicentatasie: Wikipedia articles are created by summarising what independent and reliable secondary sources have said about a subject. ('Independent' emphatically excludes press releases and other primary sources.) If you cannot find such sources, then you cannot summarise them, and therefore aren't able to draft an article. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

14:21, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Pakistannewshere
We want to make young talents appear globally using wekipedia Pakistannewshere (talk) 14:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Pakistannewshere: that may be what you want, but Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting anyone or anything. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

15:06, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Hubertgromny
Dear Wikipedia Community,

I wrote a draft for a public sculpture "Reversed Dunk" which was constructed in Berlin just recently. I find the topic important as it does reflect on the changes in the city and especially on the construction of EastSide Tower and hosting Amazon headquarters, which will have significant impact on the neighbourhood and the city at large.

As the construction was just built there is not yet proper secondary sources and I referenced the website of artists, the BKK which is association of artists in Berlin which organised competition and website of architecture buro which organised the competition for the sculpture.

From the feedback I understand that my referencing is not accurate, nevertheless I was thinking if to simplify the text to limit it for facts and withraw opinions and readings of symbolic dimension of the artwork. In this case however I wonder if the primary sources will be enough to accept the article---from my perspective it should be all right as they state facts that the sculpture was built and it was a result of the competition.

I would appreciate advice how to make article publishable with this limited amount of sources which axist at the moment, as I believe that wikipedia entry will help other writers to create the secondary sources while researching the artwork and the article will grow with time.

Best wishes, Hubert Hubertgromny (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * So what you are trying to do is get an article created so that others will then see it, write about the topic, and then create the references to put in the article. That's not how this works. If the references do not exist, the subject does not merit a Wikipedia article. A topic must be shown to be notable first- you can't create an article to generate notability. 331dot (talk) 15:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

17:58, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Pioussouls
Hello! Kindly help me out. Why is this so??? This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Assist me to improve this. Pioussouls (talk) 17:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Pioussouls You may appeal the rejection directly with the reviewer who rejected it. Be aware that promotional pieces are contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, so consider why they say is is promotional 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Pioussouls your article is promotional in nature- it is full of WP:PEACOCK language and is not written from a WP:NEUTRAL point of view.
 * Despite three declines the language has not improved, which leads me to suspect your only want to promote this person - use Wikipedia to WP:SPAM. This is not permitted.  Qcne  (talk)  19:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

23:26, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Seihlanunez22
How do I edit a citation already entered? Seihlanunez22 (talk) 23:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

23:29, 10 September 2023 review of submission by Melindam15
This was rejected, but don't understand why listing the episodes of a podcast (similar to a tv show) is not the purpose of Wikipedia? Thank you. Melindam15 (talk) 23:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * An article about a podcast must not merely list the episodes, it must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose on their own to say about it, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 23:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)