Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 September 3

= September 3 =

01:12, 3 September 2023 review of submission by EMB1991
Greetings,

Per the guidelines I have completed all items necessary for submission approval. At this point in the process, what is the specific item that you are looking for and I'll get that to you pronto

Warm regards, Eric EMB1991 (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * , an acceptable Wikipedia article summarizes the coverage that reliable, independent sources devote to the topic, and includes references to those sources. Your draft is poorly referenced and fails to make a convincing case that Miles-Baker is a notable person. Cullen328 (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Specifically, strange language claiming that this person is is completely inappropriate for a neutrally written encyclopedia. Who says that sort of thing, after all, and on what basis? Cullen328 (talk) 01:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the summation. Albeit all things true, perhaps I could sanitize a bit more. Would you be able to cut that part out? Its a point, and distinction that should be kept internal.
 * Thank you kindly,
 * Eric EMB1991 (talk) 01:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

02:16, 3 September 2023 review of submission by Qaziquza
The article was rejected because it is contrary to the purposes of Wikipedia—specifically, because "This is thing you google for home work qustions [sic]." I think otherwise, because Wikipedia already has many articles of the type in question. Could someone provide further input? Sorry if this is the wrong place/this is a breach of Wiki etiquette. Qaziquza (talk) 02:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Qaziquza May I suggest it be merged with Orders of magnitude (force) unless and until sufficient material can be found for an independent article? You may make these edits yourself.   do you have any thoughts on this, since you rejected the draft? 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with a merger. I think none of these Order of Magnitude pages make sense. Most of them are just example pages. ᗡ OLI (she/her) 08:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * They're pretty typical List-class articles, no? I've found them helpful for understanding scale, anecdotally. Qaziquza (talk) 10:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * W.r.t a merge, I think I'll just find more material—I really think that the article could be useful distinct from force. I'm new to Wikipedia policy, so if that's not alright, please do let me know.  Qaziquza (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I've accepted it. I apologize for my unfair rejection ᗡ OLI (she/her) 18:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

08:24, 3 September 2023 review of submission by Jverne2000
Can you please help me with this article so that it is accepted? I do not understand why. All of the sources are footnoted with references to putlished articles and interviews. Thanks. Jverne2000 (talk) 08:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Jverne2000 The reviewer, has referred you to WP:MUSICBIO. Have you asked them what they found lacking? 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

10:30, 3 September 2023 review of submission by Jaiseva750
tribal hockey player Jaiseva750 (talk) 10:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Jaiseva750: that's not a question; did you have one in mind you wanted to ask? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The draft was declined because there is currently no indication that the subject is notable under our WP:NATHLETE guidelines. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 13:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

15:07, 3 September 2023 review of submission by EMB1991
Hi,

I just submitted a new edit, also, I need create an "Ancestors" portion to the wikipedia page and was wondering if I could be granted access?

Please assist. Eric EMB1991 (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * You appearto be writing about yourself- while not forbidden, it is highly discouraged, at least in part because people naturally write favorably about themselves. Please read WP:AUTO.
 * I'm not sure what it is you want access to, but your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not for telling fictional accounts about ourselves. 331dot (talk) 15:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft deleted, user blocked. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

16:49, 3 September 2023 review of submission by Inna Ogiievska
Thank you.@Qcne You checked it right away, and I really appreciate the time you spent on this verification. Please help me understand which specific source is unreliable among those mentioned in the article so that I can remove it. Inna Ogiievska (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * (note to @Inna Ogiievska, just @'tting doesn't work). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Have replied on my Talk Page :)  Qcne  (talk)  17:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

16:53, 3 September 2023 review of submission by Arian Tazwer
Why My Articale Rejected Arian Tazwer (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Arian Tazwer: let's turn this around... can you tell me any reason why it shouldn't have been rejected? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

20:21, 3 September 2023 review of submission by Drthorgithecorgi
I'm fairly inexperienced at creating article. I think that this journal is notable, but I don't know how to provide more links to meet the standard. Some assistance would be appreciated! Drthorgithecorgi (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * More than half of your draft is a section labelled "Landmark papers", and is a summary of one paper published in the journal, with a citation only to the paper. As far as I can see, that section does not belong in the article at all. The article should be a summary of what independent sources have published about the journal. If you had an independent source discussing that article, then it possibly would rate a mention in the article about the journal, but not a whole paragraph, and it wouldn't contribute to establishing notability.
 * The only thing you should be looking for at this point is places where independent people have written at length about the journal itself (not just about particular content). If you cannot find any, then the journal is probably not notable in Wikipedia's sense. ColinFine (talk) 20:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * thank you! Drthorgithecorgi (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

21:02, 3 September 2023 review of submission by Adaughe2
How can I make this public? I am running a campaign in my local school district called Friends of Andrew Daugherty. To me, this is a notable position as I would like to provide context to my background to the voters in my area. Adaughe2 (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * See WP:NBLP for what is notable to Wikipedia. Many things are notable to almost all individuals, but we cannot have pages on absolutely everything. @Adaughe2 &mdash; Karnataka  talk  21:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, your draft was rejected and will not be considered further. &mdash;  Karnataka  talk  21:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)