Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 September 5

= September 5 =

04:21, 5 September 2023 review of submission by Ikenagy
why was it bad? Ikenagy (talk) 04:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Do you really need to ask why your draft was unsuitable for an encyclopaedia? Please carefully read WP:PILLARS.  Qcne  (talk)  10:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

09:15, 5 September 2023 review of submission by 87.0.57.85
Hi, I am trying to make this article for the company Weakend Productions, how can be the draft accepted? If I don't find news websites, what can I do, or what can I do in general? 87.0.57.85 (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The reviewers have left you advice at the top of your draft, please see it if you haven't already. If there are no independent reliable sources that give this company significant coverage, it will not merit an article, there is nothing that you can do to confer notability on a topic.
 * If you work for this company, that needs to be declared, please see WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not work for it, I just saw their content. 87.0.57.85 (talk) 09:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If you can't find sources then I am afraid there can be no article.  Qcne  (talk)  10:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

11:35, 5 September 2023 review of submission by Athwartmisunderstand
How can I improve this article eg change or remove Athwartmisunderstand (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Athwartmisunderstand: you cannot; I've rejected it and requested deletion. Dhumik Pravin has been deleted four times, including twice at AfD, most recently only a couple of months ago. You're flogging the proverbial dead horse. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, I guess it should be deleted as there is no reliable sources. However, in future, if there is any reliable sources published, can there be a article on Dhumik Pravin? Athwartmisunderstand (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Athwartmisunderstand: if they demonstrably, as supported by reliable evidence are notable (almost certainly per the WP:GNG guideline), then it may be possible to have an article on them, yes. But I should warn you that because of the earlier deletions, the bar is probably higher than it would have otherwise been. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

12:30, 5 September 2023 review of submission by Ray the Bearman
I'm having trouble understanding on what I said wrong Ray the Bearman (talk) 12:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Ray the Bearman: Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a social media or blogging platform. You should not be writing about yourself, and any sort of promotion is not allowed. You can write limited biographical information on your user page, but it has to be within the user page policy, and you should not submit it for review as it will not be published as an article. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

15:13, 5 September 2023 review of submission by Annomita
Why the article is rejected Annomita (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Please carefully read WP:NOT. You have already had this draft deleted twice, please do not create further drafts or you risk your account being blocked.  Qcne  (talk)  15:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

15:21, 5 September 2023 review of submission by Hale204
i didnt know how do i try again Hale204 (talk) 15:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Hale204: if by "try again" you mean resubmitting, then you don't: this draft has been rejected, and will not be considered further. Promotion of any sort is not allowed on Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)