Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 April 4

= April 4 =

00:31, 4 April 2024 review of submission by SiulRotceh
This article's subject is a renowned Puerto Rican paintor. How can i ensure that it gets published? What should I add? SiulRotceh (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @SiulRotceh: this draft was declined for lack of notability, and the way to rectify that is to demonstrate through referencing that the subject is notable, either by the WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST guidelines.
 * You also need to write this in a neutral, non-promotional manner.
 * And finally, you must cite your sources inline (see WP:ILC), not pile them at the bottom like you have done. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! SiulRotceh (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

06:07, 4 April 2024 review of submission by Peizy
its important to know that other thinking to that girl. So, please let me published it Peizy (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Peizy: it's a blank, we obviously don't publish blank pages. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * its not blank page Peizy (talk) 06:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * And please don't post on your talk page, or anywhere for that matter, content that isn't related to the objectives of Wikipedia. And especially don't post negative content about living people. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * its not negative. Peizy (talk) 06:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

06:52, 4 April 2024 review of submission by Abhash Bhattarai
Why is it not getting submitted? #WikiHelp Abhash Bhattarai (talk) 06:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Abhash Bhattarai: it has been successfully submitted, and is now awaiting review.
 * I can tell you already now that it will fail that review, for multiple reasons, but it has been submitted alright. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Like most people who attempt to write an article before they have spent time learning how Wikipedia works, you have written your draft BACKWARDS.
 * First find the sources - and make sure that they are reliable and independent. Ignore anything written, published or commissioned by the subject or their associates, or based on an interview or press release from them.
 * Then, if you have found several such sources, forget everything that you personally know about the subject, and write a summary (in your own words) of what those sources say. ColinFine (talk) 19:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

07:39, 4 April 2024 review of submission by AmmarYahya96
Welcome

I hope that you are well.

I shared the data of Dr. Muhammad Khreis in the article and added the certificates and courses that he obtained. I really mean that everything mentioned in the article is the biography of Dr. Muhammad Khreis and that he became the founder of a large institution operating worldwide.

This institution (Al-Kindi Hospital - Amman, Jordan) is considered the first destination in the Middle East for treating obesity problems (note that I did not mention this point in the article so as not to be propaganda).

What do you suggest I do so that this article is not propaganda?

All respect Thank you for your help AmmarYahya96 (talk) 07:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Please disclose your connection with him, as you took his picture in a professional manner and he posed for you.
 * You have essentially posted his resume; instead, you should be summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about him, showing how he meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @AmmarYahya96: purely by coincidence I happened to look at the section 'Recommendations' first. It is riddled with peacock words and hyperbole, with "exemplary", "excellent", "safe pair hands" (sic), "most outstanding", etc. Even if these are actual quotes from genuinely reliable and independent sources, which I doubt, they have no place in an encyclopaedia article. I would have probably sent this for a speedy deletion just based on that alone. 'Propaganda' it may not be, but hagiography it certainly sounds like. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

08:03, 4 April 2024 review of submission by 154.198.97.254
Hi dear sir please creating this Page Thank you so so much. 154.198.97.254 (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * This draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

15:37, 4 April 2024 review of submission by 155.201.46.79
I need assistance submitting IOS 18 Wikipedia Page. 155.201.46.79 (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * This draft has been rejected as non-notable and WP:TOOSOON. You should wait until closer to the release time, and try again, when more and better sources are bound to be available. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

15:39, 4 April 2024 review of submission by Nowhereman5691
hello,

i try to write an article about my song. It is a description of the content of the lyrics and music theory analysis of the harmony structure. And some additional info that are written in the music video as well and in a hungarian article cited as source. But the article is getting rejected. Why? Nowhereman5691 (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Nowhereman5691: this draft has been rejected because there is no evidence that the subject is notable, by either the general WP:GNG or the special WP:NSONG guideline. Also, the referencing is inadequate.
 * You say this is about your ("my") song, and that may be the underlying reason. Wikipedia is not a place for you to tell the world about your music. We mainly want to hear what independent and reliable secondary sources have said about it.
 * You also seem to have a conflict of interest regarding this subject. I will post a message on your talk page with more information on this. Please read and action as appropriate. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

17:33, 4 April 2024 review of submission by Jeanvaljeanjacket
Hello, last week I tried to ask for advice on how to get a new version of this article reviewed – it has been updated with different reputable sources and deleted extraneous information. I can't find where that comment went so I don't know if someone already replied to it, so I am asking it again. Thank you! Jeanvaljeanjacket (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I just saw the previous reply – sorry for the second question, please disregard! Jeanvaljeanjacket (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)