Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 February 23

= February 23 =

Rapper Chauhan
Rapper Chauhan is a music arist. Nritya02 (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Nritya02: that's as may be. Do you have a question you would like to ask related to the AfC process? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

12:48, 23 February 2024 review of submission by Chukwuocha
I’m requesting an assistant for this article, it has been submitted for review and it’s yet to be reviewed, I neee assistance and also improvement for this article. Thank you  Chukwuocha (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Draft:Socket (rapper) article Chukwuocha (talk) 12:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Chukwuocha: you submitted this less than 48 hrs ago. As it says on top of the draft, "This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,864 pending submissions waiting for review." Please be patient.
 * In the meantime, if you have specific questions to ask, you may pose them here, but asking for "assistance and also improvement" is rather vague. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

14:14, 23 February 2024 review of submission by Chaialhurriya
Can you please clarify why this article was rejected.....I was told it was because: Fails notability under WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BIO1E but articles of similar nature have been published see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_Hersh_Goldberg-Polin or Chaialhurriya (talk) 14:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Chaialhurriya: it doesn't matter what other articles may exist (see WP:OSE), what matters is whether this draft satisfies the current requirements for publication, which in my view as well as that of the reviewer who actually declined (not 'rejected', which is different) it, this doesn't. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I think you may be interested in this: Killing of Sidra Hassouna Ominateu (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ominateu: okay, so you've created that directly in the article space – what's your point? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No, I meant to state that the person who had their draft declined created it anyways. Ominateu (talk) 19:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ominateu: okay, thanks. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

14:23, 23 February 2024 review of submission by Armansalmani
Why is this draft rejected? Armansalmani (talk) 14:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Armansalmani: because the first attempt was reviewed multiple times, and finally rejected as non-notable. There is no point in then creating additional copies of the same, especially to do so without offering any further evidence of notability. We can't keep reviewing the same subject over and over. This is fast becoming tendentious. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * But the final version has more changes and references than the initial version.  And I tried to have all the phrases with citations. Armansalmani (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Armansalmani I have had a look at the draft and I agree with the Reject. There is no indication this is acceptable for Wikipedia.  Qcne  (talk)  14:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Armansalmani Not only that, just having citations is not important. It's written in a style considered to be advertising and promotional. Articles have to be written in a neutral POV without any errors or promotional content. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Armansalmani: this draft cites two sources, one of which is pretty useless in what comes to establishing notability, and the other is worse than useless. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

19:19, 23 February 2024 review of submission by Robert20654
Johannes Maximilinan stated that "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified." My submission Pentaclub (The Club of Five) has a lot of notes that refer to external third party links where every information can be verified. What should I have to add? Many thanks. Robert20654 Robert20654 (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Robert20654: you cannot cite Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia, and Facebook and Instagram are user-generated and therefore not reliable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @DoubleGrazing: thank you very much. I removed Wikipedia as a source and also FB & IG. Then I've resubmitted the draft. I hope it should be fine. Can you check it please? Thank you again. Robert20654 (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Robert20654: the ref #1 is still Wikipedia, and #2 is Facebook. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @DoubleGrazing: sorry for that and thank you. I've deleted them. Do you think the page can be moved now? And if yes, can you help me, please? Thank you. Robert20654 (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You have submitted it and it is pending. Please be patient; reviews are conducted by volunteers. Do you have a particular need for a speedy review? 331dot (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

21:24, 23 February 2024 review of submission by CMG95
This submission has been in review since Jan 18, any insight into what may be holding up the review would be appreciated CMG95 (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Drafts are reviewed in no particular order by volunteers. As noted on your draft, "This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,853 pending submissions waiting for review." Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

22:23, 23 February 2024 review of submission by Stefo89
Hi everyone, I'd like some help to understand how this article draft can be improved. What are some examples of concrete changes that can be applied? The user who reviewed the draft wrote that the style looks like a press release rather than an article–probably due to my attempt to maintain neutrality. Also, the references cited are web articles on Google with sources such as TechCrunch that I see mentioned in many other Wikipedia articles about companies, too. Thank you in advance for your feedback. Stefo89 (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Stefo89: the concrete changes you need to make must directly address the decline reason, namely lack of evidence of notability. And if the reviewer has additionally commented on promotional tone and/or content, that needs to be addressed as well. These reviews are not done flippantly, the reviewers have real reasons to say what they say. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

23:43, 23 February 2024 review of submission by Johnnybart2
It's been four months since I resubmitted my article on David T. Adams and I've had no response on its status. Can someone contact me and advise? Johnnybart2 (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @johnnybart2: except you haven't resubmitted it. ltb d l (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Johnnybart2, it looks as though you last submitted it on October 6, and it was declined on November 7, so now it's waiting on you again. After being declined, reviewers don't look at the article again until it gets resubmitted. You should have the button to resubmit if you wish enabled, but have a look at the reviewers' notes and fix the issues mentioned to give your article the best possible chance of being accepted! StartGrammarTime (talk) 05:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)