Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 February 28

= February 28 =

00:02, 28 February 2024 review of submission by Franciscoevan
Dear Wikipedia Expert Editors,

I am resubmitting my draft article on Mahavatar Swami Bhai after carefully implementing revisions based on the feedback provided from Vgbyp during his previous review. Here's how I've addressed the key suggestions:

Notability: I've incorporated additional secondary sources, including news features and published works.

Neutrality: I've revised the language to eliminate any promotional tone.

Secondary Sources: I've made an effort to prioritize secondary sources.

I would be grateful for any further guidance you could provide to make this article even more aligned with Wikipedia's standards. Thank you for the support.


 * Note: I have fixed the link to the draft as a courtesy to responders; Franciscoevan is the draft creator. StartGrammarTime (talk) 06:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * the draft has been submitted (for rather than by you, but still), and a reviewer will take a look at it at some point. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Sungodtemple hi! I would like to know why you resubmitted the article before making the necessary changes that @Michael D. Turnbull suggested? isn't modifyng the article coming from expert suggestions the best course of action before resubmitting it? Now, the article has been rejected again...
 * Yea, I realized that now @DoubleGrazing. Fortunately we could trace stuff back to its perpetrators! Franciscoevan (talk) 15:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Franciscoevan you said you were resubmitting the article, but I noticed you didn't actually mark it as such, so I submitted it for you. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 22:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * All good @Sungodtemple, perhaps I didnt write my help post correctly and therefore, misunderstanding happened. I wanted to first correct the article with the suggestions of the expert writers and then re-submit... I will be more precise next time. Franciscoevan (talk) 19:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks! @StartGrammarTime :) Franciscoevan (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

06:48, 28 February 2024 review of submission by M.Shaseeb
Hello,

I am trying to create a page on the Law Reform Commission of Mauritius and every time, the article is being rejected upon review for the reason that it infringes the copyright policy of wikipedia. You may wish to note that the articles which Wikipedia found to have been copied are the works of the Commission. I have pointed out this issue at the beginning. Grateful if you can enlighten me of how to proceed with the creation of the page as I have tight deadline to complete this task.

Thanks and kind regards,

Shaseeb M.Shaseeb (talk) 06:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @m.shaseeb: don't copy anything. ltb d l (talk) 07:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @M.Shaseeb: you say they are "the works of the Commission", as if that is a defence – that is precisely the problem. If the original author has released the content under a compatible licence, or it has otherwise entered into the public domain, we need to see evidence of that. Anything that is explicitly under copyright cannot be used, and anything where copyright status is unclear or implied must be assumed to be under copyright also. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

08:50, 28 February 2024 review of submission by Cagnotti
Hello!

I am in charge of communication at IRSOL and have created a Wikipedia page in English.

To create it, I used the Italian page, which already exists: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRSOL I used the same links and references.

Yet my draft was rejected.

Please, can you help me to make it suitable for publication?

Thank you in advance.

Marco Cagnotti Cagnotti (talk) 08:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Cagnotti: the different language versions of Wikipedia are entirely separate projects with their own policies and guidelines; what is acceptable in the Italian version may not be acceptable here, and vice versa. Here we need the subject to demonstrate notability, which in the case of organisations requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. Your draft cites two papers, neither of which meets this standard.
 * It is also unclear where the information in the draft comes from, as it has only two citations, both in the 'Instrumentation' section, with the rest of the content unreferenced.
 * Your draft was not 'rejected', only declined, meaning you are welcome to resubmit it once you have addressed the decline reasons. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply.
 * I have added some independent and reliable references. Can you please check if everything is OK now?
 * Thank you in advance.
 * M.C. Cagnotti (talk) 09:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

12:26, 28 February 2024 review of submission by Artisticresearch
Please help to re-write this entry with more a neutral tone - thanks. Artistic Research (talk) 12:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Artisticresearch: this draft has been rejected already.
 * In any case, we don't get involved in co-editing here at the help desk.
 * Please don't start a new thread with each comment, just add to the existing one. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

12:50, 28 February 2024 review of submission by Justice11590
i don't know why you have deleted it. I want to know the reason Justice11590 (talk) 12:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Justice11590: it hasn't been deleted yet, although it soon will be. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a free hosting provider for your (?) poems. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * PS: Do you also operate the account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

13:28, 28 February 2024 review of submission by EnesYila
Hi, I submitted a draft on Mikko Tolonen. On the topic, I could find only these sources: uni web page for Tolonen, a few news, some biographical information from a few foundations, and a blog page on Mikko Tolonen. I wonder whether the uni web page on Tolonen is considered as a secondary source or not. Also, what would you recommend me to solve the current issues further? EnesYila (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @EnesYila: no, his own university page is primary, as well as being close to him (ie. not independent). It can be used to verify non-contentious facts, but not much beyond that.
 * Your primary aim here is to consider whether he meets one or more of the criteria enumerated in WP:NACADEMIC, and to reliable provide evidence to back up any such claim. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your feedback. Now it has more detail on the number of publications, awards, academic projects funded by Academy of Finland, and collaborations with more diverse sources. I primarily aimed to show
 * "his impact in the field" with independent and reliable sources such as news,
 * "awards" he has been given by respective institutions such as Ministry of Education of Finland (related to criterion 2),
 * and being in the executive board of EADH (related to criterion 6).
 * I hope now the text meets one or more of the criteria. Feel free to correct me if further edit is needed. EnesYila (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

15:42, 28 February 2024 review of submission by SportsSquareEditor
Can somebody help me with my article? Pleaseeeeee SportsSquareEditor (talk) 15:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * There is absolutely nothing to suggest that your newsletter is notable, I have tagged it fro speedy deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

17:08, 28 February 2024 review of submission by 209.96.100.32
How to get accepted 209.96.100.32 (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Find and include two published independent sources that cover him in depth. I'm guessing that those don't exist in which case I'd suggest not trying to make a Wikipedia article on him. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

20:08, 28 February 2024 review of submission by Nightwish1239
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for Beginners. Thank you. I receive this how to make it right Nightwish1239 (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Nightwish1239: I'm assuming you're referring to ? It is completely unreferenced, and was simultaneously declined for both lack of reliable sources and lack of inline citations. You need to provide referencing, to tell us where all this information is coming from, and you need to do this specifically by way of inline citations, so that it is clear which source has provided which bit of the information. See WP:REFB for advice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I delete it.
 * Example: Andrea Bocceli I removed to cite to his wikipedia page Nightwish1239 (talk) 20:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you're saying. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

22:53, 28 February 2024 review of submission by Wikinoobrider
This is my first article need help or assistance in writing it Wikinoobrider (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

23:12, 28 February 2024 review of submission by Urps5
Hi can you help me to make Anvay Saxena better. Urps5 (talk) 23:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)