Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 January 16

= January 16 =

01:05, 16 January 2024 review of submission by McMi!!ian
Hello,

I am trying to publish a page on Storm Internet Services (please note: I do not work for this company). I am trying to publish this page so that Storm Internet Services can be added to the list of Canadian ISPs here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_internet_service_providers_in_Canada

There are several companies on that list with less references, that read more like advertisements. I am wondering why these entries were accepted, but the one about Storm Internet Services has been rejected? McMi!!ian (talk) 01:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * It may be suspicion you were hired to advertise this company. Whilst the others for whatever reason were accepted. Someone higher up may let you publish it if you get enough attention. Wilhelm444 (talk) 07:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Wilhelm444: I'm sorry to say, nothing in your answer is correct; please don't give misleading 'advice'. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry. Wilhelm444 (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @McMi!!ian: we don't assess drafts by comparing to articles that may exist out there; there is almost certainly a completely unreferenced article among the 6.7m or so in the English-language Wikipedia, and that would mean that we can accept every draft without any sources at all. Also, those articles you refer to may not have been 'accepted' as such; they may predate the AfC process, or have been created by users with sufficient permissions to publish directly. (PS: See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

04:33, 16 January 2024 review of submission by 103.144.27.118
Why I'm getting rejected ? 103.144.27.118 (talk) 04:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * It has been rejected as it is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

06:55, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Wilhelm444
Is it possible to use your own personal evidence as a source? I do not want this topic to be left alone, I feel strongly about it. Wilhelm444 (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Wilhelm444, You cannot do anything with this draft as it has been rejected and tagged under CSD G3 criteria for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax. – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I am sorry for any time wasted. I do intend on becoming a journalist now, it was not a hoax. It lacked all evidence except my small community's witness to this cult. I may go to a more expert on the topic and then publish the article. If it is cited one day, I may finally write the article I hoped of making. Wilhelm444 (talk) 07:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Wilhelm444: no, it isn't possible to use 'personal evidence'. Sources must be not only published, they must be reliable and secondary. Wikipedia isn't for recording your own experiences, it is for summarising what published sources have said about a subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

08:29, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Andykatib
I was wondering if this article is ready to submit. The article covers the film development, casting, and production process. I have also attached reviews. There are 12 sources in the reference list. I have done Google searches but there are not too many sources on the series. Do you think it is ready yet or is there still room for improvement? I could archive the references if it helps. Andykatib (talk) 08:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

10:07, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Kingnuel001
i am requesting assistance to add this article as its being constantly declined because of lack of enough references and i can see other articles not up to this that are being accepted Kingnuel001 (talk) 10:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Kingnuel001: never mind other articles, they have no bearing on this. Your draft has failed to demonstrate that the subject is notable. And you have now created this so many times, that although you finally disclosed your COI, you are getting close to being blocked for promotional editing. My advice would be to stop now, and find something else to write about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please see other stuff exists; there are many reasons that inappropriate articles could exist, this cannot justify the addition of more inappropriate articles. that another article exists does not mean that it was "accepted" by anyone. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, inappropriate articles can get by us and take time to deal with. If you would like to help us, please identify any inappropriate articles you see so action can be taken.  We need the help. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

11:25, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Tromaggot
The Tromanale Filmfestival was the only counterpart festival of the Berlinale in Berlin - and it was very specal because of its underground feeling touch. There are many Wikipedia-Sides, that reference to the Tromanale. But all these references are dead links, because there is still no Tromanale Wikipedia Side on the english part of Wikipedia. In the German Part of Wikipedia there ia a Tromanale page. I can not really understand what the matter is. There are many Dead links on Wikipedia because the Tromanale-Links are red, there is a German Wikipedia Side of the Tromanale - so why cant there be a english side of the Tromanale? Tromaggot (talk) 11:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Tromaggot: the reason (for the time being, at least) why there isn't an article on this subject is that no one has written one. Or to be more precise, you have written a draft three times, and three times abandoned it, causing the drafts to be deleted after six months. The fourth attempt is now awaiting review. Does that answer your question?
 * As for the redlinks you mention, there is no fundamental problem with having redlinks.
 * And whether the German-language Wikipedia has an article on this subject isn't strictly relevant, as each language version is completely separate.
 * BTW, do you have some connection with this subject? If so, please see WP:COI. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I deleted the references from the homepage tromanale.org - Now there are only references from official Berlinale Homepage and old online newspaper articles. Tromaggot (talk) 11:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

12:15, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Justsstdesigns
what wrong with this article Justsstdesigns (talk) 12:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Justsstdesigns: what's wrong with it is that it's WP:ADMASQ, and you haven't disclosed your paid editing. And even if/when you do, you still aren't allowed to use Wikipedia to promote your clients. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

16:32, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Fuzeen
Draft:Pureland — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzeen (talk • contribs) 13:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Why you had rejected my article Fuzeen (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not interested in things you made up one day.  Qcne  (talk)  13:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * But really this is true that Pureland has established yesterday. Fuzeen (talk) 13:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read made up.  Qcne  (talk)  13:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It is not me that I had established Fuzeen (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay?  Qcne  (talk)  13:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I am Pakistani and a Bangladeshi unknown guy created this Pureland. Fuzeen (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay  Qcne  (talk)  13:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please accept my article Fuzeen (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Nope, it has been rejected.  Qcne  (talk)  13:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * What can I do now? Fuzeen (talk) 13:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Nothing, maybe you could improve existing Wikipedia articles.  Qcne  (talk)  13:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter who made it up. If it hasn't been discussed by several independent reliable sources, Wikipedia isn't interested. Period. ColinFine (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

13:48, 16 January 2024 review of submission by 2A02:AB88:7083:A480:FCA6:CFC4:8623:F434
Hi, is this page under approval or is it declined? thanks 2A02:AB88:7083:A480:FCA6:CFC4:8623:F434 (talk) 13:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You have submitted Draft:Susan_Kosti for review.  Qcne  (talk)  13:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

13:49, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Fuzeen
Please accept my article .I am not involved with this Pureland. Fuzeen (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter whether you are involved or not the topic is not notable. Theroadislong (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I've already answered your question above @Fuzeen.  Qcne  (talk)  13:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

16:42, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Ranjetkumar66
Dear wikipedia admins. 'i am writing to a request the undeletion of the Wikipedia page for Dr. Pretit Samdani the page was recently deleted, and i believe there are compelling reasons for its reinstatement. Ranjetkumar66 (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Ranjetkumar66 but it was not deleted- it's right here. But I declined it as there is no evidence the person passes our notability requirements.  Qcne  (talk)  16:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * OP blocked as a sock.-- Ponyo bons mots 20:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

16:59, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Bhdshoes2
- In trying to establish this subject as notable did I "over-peacock" with laudatory quotes? They are all quotes, not textual language. Trying to call attention to the sources establishing Sanders as a notable jazz player. Bhdshoes2 (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

19:00, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Toysrusisbad
can you submit it looks a wikipedia article Toysrusisbad (talk) 19:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

19:13, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Toysrusisbad
i put a lot of time into this please sumbit it Toysrusisbad (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

19:20, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Toysrusisbad
SUMBMIT IT NOW OR I WILL LEAK YOUR HOME Toysrusisbad (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Toysrusisbad threats against other users are prohibited on this platform and will lead to your account being blocked. Your draft has been rejected and will not be considered further.  Qcne  (talk)  19:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

23:01, 16 January 2024 review of submission by Sasyikumar
Why the article being rejected Sasyikumar (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Sasyikumar: because there is no evidence that the subject is notable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)