Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 January 18

= January 18 =

05:30, 18 January 2024 review of submission by Brachy0008
I came across this draft, and it seems notable. However, I’m not entirely sure if it is ok to publish into the main space.  Brachy 08  (Talk) 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * It has been submitted for review and it is pending. You haven't edited the draft, are you asking as a reviewer? 331dot (talk) 08:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , I have lived in Northern California for nearly 52 years and know quite a bit about the history of the relationship between the ILWU and the CPUSA around here. There is no doubt in my mind that Archie Brown is notable and so I have moved the draft to main space. His name is on the decision of a very signicant case he and his lawyers won before the US Supreme Court, after all, and his obituary in the New York Times makes a compelling argument for his notability. What say you, ? Cullen328 (talk) 09:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I would concur with your assessment(I hadn't examined it that closely yet). 331dot (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes  Brachy 08  (Talk) 11:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

06:29, 18 January 2024 review of submission by 210.212.98.124
Hi, I wanted to add a page for a museum that has opened in my hometown earlier in 2023. The feedback I was given for the article was that it "Does not have sustained coverage". I'm not sure what sources to cite or how to make it more substantial as it has only recently opened. My motivation for adding it is that it is an important step forward in Indian institutions (I'm not affiliated with it in any way, I'm just passionate about education!). Would appreciate any advice :) 210.212.98.124 (talk) 06:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * If the museum has just opened, it is almost certainly too soon for an article about it, as it apparently lacks the coverage needed to support an article about it. Any article about this museum must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose on their own to say about the museum, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organziation. It hasn't existed long enough to become established and recognized for its work by independent sources. 331dot (talk) 08:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

07:14, 18 January 2024 review of submission by Soojey
what went wrong in my edit please Soojey (talk) 07:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Your draft was deleted as blatant promotion while in the process of being reviewed. Writing about yourself is strongly discouraged, please read the autobiography policy. If you want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media or a personal website.  Wikipedia is for summarizing what independent reliable sources say about a topic, not what it says about itself. It's also not clear that you meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

08:21, 18 January 2024 review of submission by Iamjerotich
I have added the required information for the person above. Kindly Review my work Iamjerotich (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If something has fundamentally changed about the draft since it was rejected, like new sources that the reviewer did not consider, the first step is to appeal to the last reviewer directly. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

20:21, 18 January 2024 review of submission by Zohaabds8
I want to better understand as how can I make it publishable as I worked on the previous comments and then it got rejected Zohaabds8 (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * With nine declines and one rejection it seems pretty clear that there is nothing you can do, except to find another topic, a notable one. Theroadislong (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)