Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 1

= March 1 =

01:57, 1 March 2024 review of submission by Luka At The Civic Caucus
I was hoping to get some advice on how to increase my chances of a faster review. I understand it takes time but there was a suggestion to assign tags to help and I wanted to know if there are any other tips like that.

Also, the article has had significant revisions and it would be great if an editor could just take a look and inform me if it is good enough for publication or if other revisions are needed so I can make them before the official review.

Article link: Draft:The Civic Caucus

Also I would love some feedback on my user page thank you! Luka At The Civic Caucus (talk) 01:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Luka At The Civic Caucus: no, there isn't a way of expediting reviews, I'm afraid. The system is a 'pool', from which volunteer reviewers choose according to their own criteria what they want to review, and when. You can certainly add WikiProject tags to the draft talk page to bring it to the attention of relevant projects, but that is unlikely to have much impact on the time taken to review this. Please be patient. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay thank you. Any advice on my user page? What else can a person add? Luka At The Civic Caucus (talk) 13:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Luka At The Civic Caucus: we don't review user pages here at the AfC help desk (perhaps the Teahouse would be a better forum for that?), but you may wish to review WP:UP if you haven't yet. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay thank you Luka At The Civic Caucus (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

05:45, 1 March 2024 review of submission by AugustuscaesarVRChat
I got declined. I can not give good resources because it is a group inside of a game. AugustuscaesarVRChat (talk) 05:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @AugustuscaesarVRChat: yes, your draft did get declined, although it should have been rejected outright, really. This is clearly not a viable encyclopaedia article, and you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a free host for things you just made up. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I think it is real (not made up) but it's a chatroom. Unless national security secrets are being exchanged for money, I can't see how a chatroom is notable or how an editor could demonstrate it sufficiently with reliable sources. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

12:45, 1 March 2024 review of submission by SWS1989
Stuart Stevens is referenced on multiple Wikipedia pages as having been played Steven Beale on Eastenders but it doesn’t link to his own page. He should have his own page SWS1989 (talk) 12:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @SWS1989: being mentioned in Wikipedia articles is not a notability criterion. This draft has been rejected for lack of evident notability, and will therefore not be considered further.
 * Please also see WP:AUTOBIO for some of the reasons why you should not be writing about yourself. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

14:26, 1 March 2024 review of submission by Amitkumarmishractor
Can you please suggest me how to change and publish our content. Amitkumarmishractor (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Amitkumarmishractor: this draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. And you should not be writing about yourself in any case, see WP:AUTOBIO (as I believe you have been told several times before). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

17:11, 1 March 2024 review of submission by Joshi anand raj
Anand Raj Joshi (born May 4, 1987) is a multilingual lawyer, journalist, and social campaigner from Nepal. Fluent in English, Nepali, Hindi, Bengali, Chinese, Indonesian, and Malay, Joshi is known for his dedication to advocating for social causes and researching solutions for diseases such as DMD. He is a prominent figure in the legal and journalistic fields, using his diverse language skills to communicate and make a positive impact in various communities. Joshi anand raj (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Joshi anand raj: that's not a question, and your draft isn't much of a draft, and has already been rejected and is pending deletion. All that being the case, how can we help you? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

19:50, 1 March 2024 review of submission by Idontplaybullet
I submitted a version of this page in English (There is a Gaelic version currently published) But was rejected as the person, a prominent Irish Language writer, is deemed not notable enough yet is notable enough for ga.wikipedia.org ?! Idontplaybullet (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Idontplaybullet: each language version of Wikipedia is an entirely separate project with different requirements and guidelines; what is accepted for publication in one version may not be so in another (and the English-language one probably has the most onerous requirements in many respects).
 * In any case, Draft:Pádraig Standún was declined and subsequently deleted for being promotional. Even if the subject is notable enough to otherwise warrant inclusion in the encyclopaedia, promotional editing is not allowed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ga:Pádraig Standún has not a single inline reference. I don't know whether ga-wiki has requirements that it fails to meet (there are thousands of old articles in en-wiki that fail to meet its current sourcing requirements) but a new article will not be accepted into en-wiki without them - especially an article about a living person. ColinFine (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

19:53, 1 March 2024 review of submission by Wikinoobrider
Would like to know what to update on this article Wikinoobrider (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The reviewer left a detailed decline message, do you have a specific question about it? 331dot (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Additional references were added. I'm trying to find out if the latest version is viable for publication, or what else needs to be done. Ajdaccess (talk) 05:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you feel you have addressed the concerns of reviewers, you may submit it for a new review; we don't really do pre-review reviews. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I think this comment was supposed to be in the next section. ColinFine (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)