Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 27

= March 27 =

05:30, 27 March 2024 review of submission by T.rabia
Hello,

I wanted to know how I could help the process and get the article published. Have I not cited enough sources? The subject of the article is a very well-known investor and entrepreneur with F1 investments and more. The topic of the article seems notable as per the Notability guidelines.

Your guidance on this matter would be much appreciated. T.rabia (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @T.rabia: this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. If you believe it was rejected incorrectly, you may discuss this directly with the rejecting reviewer, although please be aware that you will need to show how and why the rejection was unjustified, not simply that you disagreed with it (and the subject being a "well-known investor" etc. is not sufficient, as this is not a recognised notability criterion). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. I will talk to the rejecting reviewer and try to get their perspective. T.rabia (talk) 08:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

10:07, 27 March 2024 review of submission by Fellow22
Kindly requesting what it will take for this page to get approved by Wikipedia, all complaints have been reviewed, but it still has not been reviewed, can you please look into this? Fellow22 (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Fellow22: this draft hasn't been resubmitted, that's why it hasn't been reviewed again. What's more, it has been rejected, which means the end of the road – time to move on, and find something else to write about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

15:40, 27 March 2024 review of submission by 50.234.189.47
Hi, I wonder if anyone can review this draft and give some feedback? 50.234.189.47 (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * It has been submitted for review. In time, a reviewer will get to it. Please be patient. ColinFine (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

17:51, 27 March 2024 review of submission by Digitalaudioworkstation
My draft article was rejected because of a lack of reliable sources. I have tried reaching out to the editor who reviewed and rejected the article but have had no luck. I am seeking assistance in determining which sources in the article are not considered reliable so that I can remove/replace them and re-submit the article. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! Digitalaudioworkstation (talk) 17:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * How did you obtain the picture of him? The file page says a photoscan and that Mr. Tat is the photographer, but the image is not a selfie. 331dot (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Most of the sources seem to document his work and accomplishments, but do not seem to be significant coverage of Mr. Tat that shows how he is (narrowly) a notable creative professional or (broadly) a notable person. 331dot (talk) 18:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

18:47, 27 March 2024 review of submission by AlexOYz
how to i create perfect wiki AlexOYz (talk) 18:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about someone. Asking "how do I create a Wikipedia article"(not a "wiki" which is a type of entire website of which Wikipedia is but one example) is like asking "how do I build a house?" without knowing anything about land acquisition, permitting, construction, plumbing, electrical work, etc. Please take the time to learn more about Wikipedia by first editing existing articles in areas that interest you- history, science, government officials, math, etc.  Also using the new user tutorial may help you. 331dot (talk) 18:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

18:56, 27 March 2024 review of submission by 2601:47:4B02:7220:9DD3:5BC8:8665:85B6
This page has been queuing for months, is it possible to get a review? A short blurb about one of my favorite composers. 2601:47:4B02:7220:9DD3:5BC8:8665:85B6 (talk) 18:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I fixed your link, it lacked the "Draft:" portion. You only submitted it today, not months ago, There is no way to guarantee a speedy review; reviews are conducted in no particular order by volunteers, doing what they can when they can. 331dot (talk) 18:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

19:34, 27 March 2024 review of submission by Avempati1015
why is this top for speedy deletion and why was it declined? I don't see how it is promotional at all. I am not associated to the individual at all. Avempati1015 (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I didn't have to get past the first line, "has etched an enduring legacy in the realm of badminton" is highly promotional. Articles should be written as dry and matter of fact as possible.  Sources also need to be in line with the text they are supporting, see Referencing for beginners. 331dot (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

23:23, 27 March 2024 review of submission by JNOJ1423
can you help me so get appecting JNOJ1423 (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @JNOJ1423: not sure what you're asking... what help do you need? This draft has been resubmitted and is awaiting review, please be patient. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ok i mean do have any advice be appect it JNOJ1423 (talk) 01:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)