Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 30

= March 30 =

01:17, 30 March 2024 review of submission by 2402:800:63F2:93CA:D07B:31A7:BD84:1A53
went wat 2402:800:63F2:93CA:D07B:31A7:BD84:1A53 (talk) 01:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't know what this means, but the draft was rejected. 331dot (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

02:52, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Divinxx
Article was rejected, but there is a significant sample size of articles for Edmonton City Councillors with much less information and less reliable sources about the Councillor. Examples, Ben Henderson (politician), Jane Batty, Bryan Anderson (politician). In the edit history of Druh Farrell, there is an overturned deletion request about Farrell not being deemed "notable" where the argument was a councillor of the major city of Calgary was in fact notable enough. Janz is a councillor of Edmonton, which is just as major of a city as Calgary, and in fact the capital city of Alberta.

How do I resubmit while sharing these things as information to take into account, rather than firing off another submission which won't have these things considered? Divinxx (talk) 02:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The draft was declined, not rejected. Rejected has a specific meaning in the submission process, that a draff may not be resubmitted. Declined meams that it may be resubmitted.
 * Please see other stuff exists. Other poor articles existing cannot justify adding more inappropriate articles. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about. If you would like to help us, please identify these other articles you have seen for possible action. We need the help.
 * As noted by the reviewer, local politicians do not merit articles merely for being a politician. You will need to show that this councilor meets the broader notable person definition. 331dot (talk) 07:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

05:21, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Shivanrai1
Why my page creation got declined? Shivanrai1 (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I fixed your link, it lacked the "Draft:" portion. I restored the previous decline message(it must remain until the draft is accepted) so you could see it. 331dot (talk) 07:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

08:18, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Noble banji
What do I do Noble banji (talk) 08:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * This page is for asking for assistance with the draft submission process, not for asking questions about articles that are actually in the encyclopedia. Please use the more general Help Desk for questions about an article. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It is also at Draft:Samuel Oladele where it has been rejected, I have sent Pastor S.O Oladele to WP:AFD. Theroadislong (talk) 13:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

13:30, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Dreamboy3143
Hi, A detailed bio (article) of the artist has been published by a prestige independent magazine. here is the link: https://www.mesam.org.tr/UserFiles/files/Dergi/34_Vizyon.pdf page.46-47 user:Dreamboy3143 13:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Dreamboy3143 If you want to have the rejection of your draft undone, you should start by contacting, the person who rejected it, on their talk page Mach61 13:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will user:Dreamboy3143 13:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

13:57, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Memevietnam98
This article is eligible to appear on Wikipedia, see User talk:Memevietnam98 to understand clearly. Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Memevietnam98: this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. And if you wish to argue otherwise, you will have to make more of a case than saying something on your talk page may or may not support this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * For context, please also refer to the user's talk page where several AfC reviewers have made no small effort to try and explain general notability and reliable source rules to the above user and been met with a less than welcome reception, one I hope is not repeated here. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

17:53, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Akhare 2024
My Draft has been declined a couple of times, I just rewrote it with a neutral point of view. Please let me know what else needs to be done Akhare 2024 (talk) 17:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

17:54, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Patwomfcs
What can be better so that this submission is granted? This is an individual who is a Division 1 Football coach and the first female coach in several instances in the NCAA and the NFL. Patwomfcs (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Patwomfcs: you need to show that this person is notable according to the criteria described in the decline notice on top of the draft (the grey box inside the large pink one). Being a football coach is not inherently notable, nor is the first-anything (such as first female coach). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There are articles on Division 1 position football coaches. Nothing linked was notable as in all university articles or press releases. Patwomfcs (talk) 18:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * are you able to review sources? Patwomfcs (talk) 18:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Being the first female head coach might be notable, as it would likely get a lot of coverage in reliable sources; I'm less sure about assistant coaches. 331dot (talk) 19:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Fits notability. Asking about the number and type of resources to use. Patwomfcs (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Please edit this existing section, instead of creating a new section. That she meets the notability criteria is not at all clear. That she was the first female assistant coach for a particular team isn't as significant as her being the first one of all time, or the first female NFL head coach. 331dot (talk) 16:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

18:02, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Gcwcd
Hi. I've been working on a draft of a new article and a comment was made, 'Article needs a lead. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 16:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)'. Please can you help with advice on how I can rectify this? Thank you. Gcwcd (talk) 18:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * By adding a lead section? The draft doesn't suggest how the person is notable in Wikipedia terms, the lead section should do this. Theroadislong (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I'm submitting a draft article and mistakenly put links to external web pages within the main article. Having read the Help articles on this subject, my understanding is that relevant and acceptable web pages can be linked to, but an inline citation should be used and then the link should be included in the References section. Please can you confirm that my understanding is correct before I resubmit my draft? Thank you. Gcwcd (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * There shouldn't be any external links in the body of the text, except as citations for information presented. Relevant external links can go in a separate section at the end of the draft. 331dot (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You don't need a separate section for every question; please edit this existing section. 331dot (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

21:04, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Nemesia345
I believe all comments have been addressed to enable publication of this page. That said, I would like to check with experienced editors to see if any changes should be made before resubmitting for publication.

The previous comments on draft that have now been addressed are as follows:

1. Completely unreferenced advantages: New references added to this section and throughout article to address.

2. table with exclusively external links: This was a formatting error due to limited author Wiki experience. Table has been updated to use appropriate references format.

3. Based on how this article currently exists, it does not seem as if its unique existence is warranted, and would be better served on a glossary of terms as suggested by AngusWOOF: Respectfully disagree. Closed-loop geothermal is a large category of research and commercial development highlighted in US Department of Energy and other highly reputable source reports, with associated content extending well beyond level of the geothermal 'glossary of terms' page. Further, I have posted the need to break this topic into a separate page on the Enhanced Geothermal Systems talk page, with no responses for nearly 6 months indicating the talk page is inactive. There is no relevant active talk page on which to discuss this, making this comment un-actionable.

Thank you for your consideration and advice. Nemesia345 (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * There is no point at all in presenting the above points here: it is unlikely anyobdy will read them. If you think that you have improved the draft sufficiently, resubmit it. ColinFine (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

21:26, 30 March 2024 review of submission by Witejere
I need some help as I'm not sure what other information, I need to add or remove from the content I've provided. I'm fine if someone can correct/update my work.

Thanks Witejere (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Witejere: this draft was declined for lack of evidence of notability. Therefore you need to show evidence that the subject meets either the special WP:NBASKETBALL notability guideline (which depends on their playing career), or the general WP:GNG one (which depends on the availability of appropriate sources covering them).
 * You also seem to have some sort of conflict of interest due to an external relationship you may have with the subject. This needs to be disclosed. I've posted a message on your talk page with instructions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)