Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 May 4

= May 4 =

01:50, 4 May 2024 review of submission by 49.204.111.73
the above article is correct made as per the current development but still the wikki have declined it i request for assistance 49.204.111.73 (talk) 01:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You have one source, which is merely a timetable. Even if it were an unimpeachable source, one source by itself cannot support an article. —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  AE thread summaries 06:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

04:35, 4 May 2024 review of submission by Johirkhanarif
Please Approved this Article, this is a cricketer article. Johirkhanarif (talk) 04:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Johirkhanarif please be patient. Drafts are reviewed in no particular order, and there are currently over 2500 drafts submitted for review.  (talk | contribs) 04:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * , the references now in the draft do not show that this person is notable. Being listed in a sports database is not significant coverage. When notability has challenged by an editor acting in good faith, then it is incumbent on you to convince reviewers that the person is WP:PERSON as Wikipedia defines that term. You have work to do. Cullen328 (talk) 07:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * okk, thanks Johirkhanarif (talk) 07:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

08:25, 4 May 2024 review of submission by DarkTwentyFive
Hey there! I'm new to Wikipedia and recently tried making my own autobiographical page. However, it got declined due to insufficient reliable sources. As I'm not that famous online, most of my supporting documents are from GitHub repositories that I've created referring to me.

Any tips on where I should the supporting sources and what they should be? DarkTwentyFive (talk) 08:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Wait sorry, I accidentally put the wrong URL. My article is here:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ruben_Roy DarkTwentyFive (talk) 08:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Your draft Draft:Ruben Roy has zero independent, reliable sources, they are what we base articles on. Theroadislong (talk) 09:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

09:16, 4 May 2024 review of submission by Genifferave
It has been quite some time since I submitted this article for review. Appreciate some feedback. Thanks. Genifferave (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Your draft is submitted and pending. As noted at the top of your draft, there are many drafts awating review, and reviews are conducted in no particular order by volunteers.  Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

09:49, 4 May 2024 review of submission by QamarSiddiqui07
why you are rejecting my page.? QamarSiddiqui07 (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

What is the reason for rejection of my page. QamarSiddiqui07 (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The reason was left at the top of the page, "This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia". Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell about themselves. If you intend to be a Wikipedia contributor, you may use your user page(User:QamarSiddiqui07) to tell limited information about yourself in the context of you as a Wikipedia contributor(but for your security please consider carefully how much personal information you want displayed in this very public forum), though not anything and everything about yourself.  331dot (talk) 09:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

12:07, 4 May 2024 review of submission by Bhairava Raama
how can i create my wikipedia page. im a writer and director in kannada film industry. Bhairava Raama (talk) 12:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You are strongly advised to not do so, please see the autobiography policy. YouTube is not generally an acceptable source. Any article about you must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about you, not what you want to say about yourself. 331dot (talk) 12:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

16:29, 4 May 2024 review of submission by Bhukya Gangadhar Naik
hello then how we should we have to write the article please suggest me tell me what exactly i have to improve in the article Bhukya Gangadhar Naik (talk) 16:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * No improvement is possible, it has now been deleted. Please learn more about Wikipedia by reading WP:5P and using the new user tutorial. 331dot (talk) 17:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @331dot we've had four of these weird sales-related drafts submitted - all today and all by new users. Are you able to shed any light?
 * Draft:A_day_in_the_life_of_a_salesman/woman
 * User:L_N_MANISH/sandbox
 * User:Bhukya_Gangadhar_Naik/sandbox
 * Draft:Understanding_The_Seller
 *  Qcne  (talk)  17:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If I had to hazard a guess, it might be a non-WikiEd class who was told to put an essay on Wikipedia by an instructor who has no clue how Wikipedia works. This is why you co-ordinate with WikiEd first, people! —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  AE thread summaries 17:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That makes a lot of sense.  Qcne  (talk)  17:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Beat me to it. :) 331dot (talk) 19:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've just rejected Draft:Sales Blunder, an odd mix of how-to-guide and neologism. And before that, rolled back the resubmission of the already-rejected Draft:Traits of a Successful salesperson. Wonder if these are part of the same activity, then? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Quite possibly. —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  AE thread summaries 15:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've started a thread at AN about this; any further discussion about this should probably go there. —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  AE thread summaries 16:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

18:06, 4 May 2024 review of submission by 2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E380:59DC:A938:B683
Contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Please do not resubmit the draft for review again unless you create a same list of power outages in article namespace. Thanks. 2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E380:59DC:A938:B683 (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This draft has been rejected for the third time and will not be considered further. Don't try and twist what the reviewers have been saying; they said nothing about creating a similar list in mainspace and flat-out said "Do not submit this again."[emphasis added] If you submit this again, the odds are very good it will be taken to WP:Miscellany for deletion. —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  AE thread summaries 18:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

18:35, 4 May 2024 review of submission by Ruth Bader Yinzburg
Hi, my AFC was declined because the subject was not deemed notable enough. I cited two book reviews and a significant book award that the subject won. How much more material would I have to find for the subject to be deemed notable? Or is this one of those cases where it might make more sense to do a draft on the book, as opposed to the author. Or is the problem that wiki doesn’t consider the pen/Faulkner to be a major literary prize within the notability guidelines for authors? Ruth Bader Yinzburg (talk) 18:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * No, the issue is your sources are not in-line. For biographies of living people, you cannot just slap a references list on the end and call it good; you need to cite your sources at the end of every claim that a reasonable person could challenge. —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  AE thread summaries 18:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I have formatted the references to be inline for you, some more sourced content might help the reviewers. Theroadislong (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I’ll see what other sources I can add. Ruth Bader Yinzburg (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I added more sourced content and moved it to main space. Theroadislong (talk) 20:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! It looks great, and now I know how much more these should be filled out. Ruth Bader Yinzburg (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

23:05, 4 May 2024 review of submission by 82.18.131.62
Hey! Trying to create a new page for a company called Pharmlogic and looking for any assistance and suggestions in how we can improve this so it's approved. 82.18.131.62 (talk) 23:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a business directory where mere existence is sufficient for inclusion. There is nothing in this draft to suggest that the business is even remotely notable or noteworthy. You need to produce independent and reliable secondary sources with significant coverage of this business, to demonstrate notability per WP:NCORP.
 * You also need to disclose your conflict of interest (COI). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thank you for the info.
 * No conflict of interest. 82.18.131.62 (talk) 19:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

23:38, 4 May 2024 review of submission by Drxhemant
WHY THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE CAN'T BE SUBMITTED ? AS SUITABLE REFERENCES HAVE BEEN ENCLOSED

"DR. HEMANT JAISINGH" Drxhemant (talk) 23:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Your self-promotional autobiography has been rejected and will not be considered further. Cullen328 (talk) 00:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)