Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/feedback/Archive 19

Feedback from AWikiAA (3 January 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Draft:John Chavis Memorial Park
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * within a day or two


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * noting specific areas of improvement in the article as they relate to the rubric (feedback: "How so?" or "needs more detail here")

Thanks for the speedy review!

Feedback from SenatorLEVI (7 January 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Quite clear.

(Less than a day, it was very surprising and also nice.
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Not really, I was surprised at how quick my article was reviewed. But I think it was just because of the reliability/notability of it as well as the categories I added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SenatorLEVI (talk • contribs) 08:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Hashim Tariq bhat (18 January 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hashim Tariq bhat (talk • contribs) 17:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Shoukanai (22 January 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Draft: Shūkan Bunshun


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Within a week


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Not really, except to express thanks to the reviewer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoukanai (talk • contribs) 11:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Go4navy (24 January 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Geetanjali Mishra


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Very clear


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Very quickly, hence extremely satisfied.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Keep up the good work Sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Go4navy (talk • contribs) 09:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from St3095 (26 January 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Template:YG Entertainment artist


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, I did.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * About two days


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * I edited the document and removed colon before category names. Click here. But, these categories didn't go outside the green box (template documentation) and the template are not shown in every single categories.
 * Can you fix it? - St3095  (?)  15:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Fossdd (31 January 2021)
Pine Microsystems Inc. Yes, of course. Was really easy. Loving it to contribute to Wikipedia. Very fast and quick. About maybe some minutes? Thanks to  Mario Jump  83!  Not really. You're great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fossdd (talk • contribs) 11:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * What was your submission?
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Phoenix7119 (7 February 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Wallace Rasmussen


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes. The instructions were relatively clear. I understood them. Thank you.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * For me, the entire process took three weeks.

Phoenix7119 (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Yes. Please make sure all of your editors understand what constitutes Wikipedia notability. Some of them are clueless. I must admit that I did receive positive feedback from a few people, and I thanked them. And the not so positive feedback provided opportunities for growth as well. But if it had not been for the Editor sdkb, appearing out of nowhere just a few hours ago, I don't know where I would be today. If it's possible, I would like to recommend sdkb for a top Barnstar Award for demonstrating courage, wisdom and fairness. It is clearly deserved.

Feedback from Marie C. Grasmeier (14 February 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Maritime Sociology


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Mostly


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Very quick. Overnight. Thank you so much.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Ate the time, not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marie C. Grasmeier (talk • contribs) 07:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from BrownieKing (20 February 2021)
My last submission is Tropical cyclones in 1999. Yeah. Just, over a hour. Make it faster if they can. But still, good job! Kudos!
 * What was your submission?
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from BTV55 (4 March 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * George A. LeMaistre


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, but I found the submission process unclear. I think the problem was the view mode, but I am not sure. I am still a newbie.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Very quickly. Maybe one hour?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Editing existing articles is easy. Creating a new article is pretty easy. Submitting the new article -- as noted above -- a bit baffling. The biggest obstacle for me remains the discussion process. I am never quite sure how or where that takes place and how matters are resolved, if, indeed, they are. That said, I am loving the opportunity to improve this resource. Thank you for all that everyone does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BTV55 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from ProudMallu (9 March 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Priya Prakash Varrier


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Very fast


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * No, thank you so much. ProudMallu (talk) 11:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from AGeorges60 (18 March 2021)
Bio Very clear very quickly For now I am in the process of learning and I am able to find documentation about everything I need. Certainly, I will get in touch again once I am more familiar with how things work.
 * What was your submission?
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Thank you very much for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AGeorges60 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Madge1938 (19 March 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Silvia Schulman


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Well, I've made the edits and submitted changes, but I have no idea what happens next!


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * it took a few months.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Maybe have more concrete suggestions about how to improve and make the proper edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madge1938 (talk • contribs) 12:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from LovingOperaForever (23 March 2021)
I had different reviews, which from the general wiki point of view can be considered good, but until I got an expert reviewer about my topic, I couldn't move on. Often, the reviewers don't leave any comments and try to get a specific word; it becomes challenging. Yes, but for a beginner like me, it takes a while to fit the process.
 * What was your submission?
 * Did you find the instructions clear?

The reviews were quick, but the follows up very slow.
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Yes, assign the review to the right team directly (insert a new field to select the article's area) who has the proper knowledge, circumstances that can lead to a delay generated from the reviewer should suggest giving the review to someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LovingOperaForever (talk • contribs) 20:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Generalrelative (6 April 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Irmela Mensah-Schramm


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yup!


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Super quick!


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Just wanted to say thanks.

Generalrelative (talk) 16:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Socialsciencenerd (7 May 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Emotional choice theory


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Absolutely! They were very clear and extremely helpful.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Super-fast.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * I think Wikipedia's current practice of encouraging newcomers to submit drafts for review and to obtain feedback is sensible. Once writers have a bit more experience, they can then try and create new pages directly.

Many thanks! Socialsciencenerd (talk) 09:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Yaakovaryeh (10 May 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Roger S. Gottlieb


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Pretty clear (but IIRC, could have been clearer).


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 16 weeks! :/


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Yes, in addition to giving a class rating, include (specific) suggestions for article improvement. The article is given rating but the grading scheme lists numerous criteria which makes it hard to determine which specific aspects require improvement.Yaakovaryeh (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from PhillipRyanNY (19 May 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * My submission was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destination_Marfa_(film)


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Unfortunately not. I found everything to be rather confusing.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Not well at all. I've been accused of being paid to write the submission and being accused of having a conflict of interest. I think that's disgusting because your editors are slandering and defaming me and assassinating my character. We (my wife and I )are fans of the town of Marfa and the Marfa lights which we have visited for years. They are a huge phenomenon. There hasn't been a film made about Marfa since Giant with James Dean and it makes us proud. My wife is from Marfa, she grew up there. Once we learned about this film (which seems to have a ton of exposure already all over the internet with trailers and posters and photos that are now legally public domain) I looked it up on imdb and on Wikipedia. I saw that it didn't have a Wikipedia page. So I reached out to the film's social media pages to let them know we are fans of Marfa and that my wife is from there. I told them we are even fans of some of the actors in the film from other projects. It was a while until I heard back from them. I asked for permission as a fan to be able to set up a wiki page and again as a fan to mention them on social media. They said the producers were fine with that and that the film's release was delayed to do Covid, but that as long as we (my wife and I) were fans, they were fine with it.

You're making a mountain of out nothing, being far too dramatic. If your editors had spent this much time doing their own jobs then Destination Marfa would already have had its own Wikipedia page. I wouldn't have had to add anything.

I don't have any attachments to the film other than being a fan of the town of Marfa, I like the trailer they released and I like two or three of the actors. There is no conflict of interest because nothing subjective has been included in the article. It is all objective and all factual. I find your responses and behavior to be uncouth. You've played judge and jury with me and slandered and defamed me. Guilty till proven innocent, and I haven't done anything wrong. I apologize for whatever rules I wasn't aware of but am now aware of them.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Well you could thank folks for contributing an article and be a little more professional and polite before slandering them. It doesn't make sense to personally attack people, it's just not smart. The process should be a little easier to understand, and you should ask the person submitting the articles more questions before accusing and judging them, it doesn't behoove anyone or make anybody want to ever read or use Wikipedia again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhillipRyanNY (talk • contribs) 16:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Aprilsola (6 June 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Draft:Ishwar Puri


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Within a month


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * The editors were direct, polite and helpful, see @Nearlyevil665, @Jeromeenriquez and @Nomadicghumakkad to whom I am very grateful. The process worked smoothly.Aprilsola (talk) 15:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from AVBT (6 June 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * AVBT


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Difficult but ok


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 4.5 months


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * It is indexed incorrectly. Instead of "surgical oncology" (which means cancer surgery) it should be indexed as "surgical procedures and techniques."

Feedback from Pikabruce (13 June 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Louise Alexander (dancer)


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Clear enough to get it done.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Amazingly fast. After the "up to five months" for approval warning, I was overjoyed to find it posted the next day.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Can't think of anything

Feedback from Mredwin (15 June 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * A biography of Bob Boote

I found the advice I received wha I asked specific questions very helpful. Many thanks then and to the final reviewer who cleaned up the article.
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Reasonable i.e. understandable in the end but confusing at first as I am wholly new to creating a page. There was a very large amount of support and advice available but navigatnig to it and getting what helped was tricky (for me)


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Immediately at first (& rejected) updateated and again after 4 months (& accepted)


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * It would have been nice to know if I was in a queue and that it was moving forward, but that would go against the policy of reviewers picking what they would review.

Feedback from WikiUName (18 June 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * NO - not really . . . . I am have a lot of trouble removed the wrong photo and replacing it with an acceptable one.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * seven months of editing - very painstaking and very slow and I never know how to communicate with anyone. . . hugely depressing and frustrating process . . . . three - four days of adding code at a time. ..


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * yes - if possible - dedicate a terrific competent editor - like captain eek - to a lay person like me . . . so that I can actually know how to add text / what to remove, etc. Right now - I would like to add a photo and launch the article . . . I have no idea how to do either. . ..

Feedback from Henk Jan de Jonge, 26 June, 2021

 * What was your submission?


 * Henk Jan de Jonge now in start-class


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Thank you for promoting this draft to the start-class. I have read the 'editing suggestions' belonging to this category. However, the references are all to reliable, verifiable, impartial sources or to publications in peer reviewed, publicly accessible publications. If there are other imperfections (grammar, style?), can you please point these out to me? Thank you.

2A02:A465:C8D5:1:B80A:5789:DBD7:E263 (talk) 09:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from JashonC2005 (30 June 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from JashonC2005 (30 June 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by JashonC2005 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from 大丽 (3 July 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Tong Zeng


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * The writing is very standard, professional and easy to understand. It's just that I need to convert to Chinese. The time is slower.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * I got the review very quickly. It's only a few hours. It's very efficient. Thank the editor who reviewed my articles for me.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Dear editors

First of all, thank you for your recognition and encouragement.

I'm still studying at University in Beijing. I learned a lot by writing Wikipedia.

My grandfather told me the story of Tong Zeng. They are a generation. I adore Mr. Tong Zeng very much. Recently I got his approval to write his article. Coincidentally, Mr. Tong Zeng told me that he recently had an email exchange with Mr. Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia. He congratulated Wikipedia on its 20th anniversary!

Mr. Tong Zeng also said that he would be very honored to be on Wikipedia! Because Wikipedia is the most popular public welfare website.

In addition, I have a request. My article can take a step further from "C". Can you give me more help in this aspect, such as some specific opinions according to my article.

Because I need to look at Wikipedia over the wall. I wonder if there are any volunteer editors of Wikipedia in Beijing.

I wish you all the best!

Beijing: 大丽

7,3

Feedback from Missmeg01 (6 July 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * John Steven Gurney


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, but I had to do a lot of searching around to find instructions for each step of the way. It was very much less than straightforward.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * It was about 7 months of waiting.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * The randomness of the review process (the note that articles are reviewed in random order) is ridiculous. They should be reviewed in the order they are received so that there is at least a light at the end of the tunnel when you submit an article. When I submitted, I saw a note that said it could be up to 3 months. This kept getting longer and longer the longer I waited. I felt helpless and it was very frustrating. It does not make me want to go through the process of creating an article again.

Feedback from Neil Erickson (9 July 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Orson Rehearsed


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * In a timely fashion


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Worked great!

Feedback from GRALISTAIR (16 July 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Midland Main Line railway upgrade


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Not too bad


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Definitely slow and room for improvement > 4 months


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Get AfCs done quickly by doing a quick check for plagiarism and let the community improve the article rather than waiting months for a reviewer GRALISTAIR (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from 80.147.39.57 (16 July 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Lucy Mensing


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * well, not quite


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * fast, thanks


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * clearer instructions to new users how to upload a ready submission (assuming good knowledge of the wiki language)

Thanks for your help, Stuart!

Feedback from Hanjaf1 (17 July 2021)
Tobias Adrian
 * What was your submission?

Yes, but I needed help interpreting them, I think.
 * Did you find the instructions clear?

Surprisingly fast. Almost immediately. It was submitted, reviewed, revised, re-reviewed, and accepted within 24 hours.
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

No.
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Lowryedale (26 July 2021)
Thomas Ellerby Portrait Painter
 * What was your submission?
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Not for someone who has never been taught anything to do with computers and is having trouble understanding very basic jargon! Seeing where to click for the next stage to be achieved was frequently a real challenge! I did try to read and understand the help guides and am sure 99% of the time the fault was mine but would have loved to find something very basic. I expect it is there but there was just so much information.

Part of the problem was that I had two people sending me messages and one very kindly expanded on the article and my references which then threw me into confusion when I wanted to follow the advice and expand my own. Still I have achieved a stub but still not sure what really happens next and keep being asked how even that can be viewed by others!


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Very, very rapidly - within minutes!


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * A guide for computer illiterates!!Lowryedale (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Adityanag2002 (2 August 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * It was about Perin Bharucha nee Chandra a women freedom fighter from Indian sub-continent


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * It took a while but i am glad it was reviewed after initial rejection


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Could you make the interface for submission a little more visually simple. Thanks

Feedback from 100.2.238.109 (9 August 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * It was a list of launches by the Minotaur.
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * It took 2 months, and that was lucky. Another 2 of my submissions took 6 months (while pending for one review).


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Yes! Rather than reviewing the submissions in a random order (which caused of my drafts to take 4 minutes for review and another 6 months), review by longest waiting.

Feedback from Vanilie (9 August 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * U-BeS


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes very much


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * less than 5 days which feels very quick


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * not at the moment but I have a question. The image was deleted, I'd like to know the reason. Thanks!

Feedback from TheresNoTime (23 August 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Android App Bundle


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * I approached this from the viewpoint of a brand new editor (or, as much as I could). I used the Article wizard, which made it very easy to go through the process of ensuring the topic was likely notable enough for inclusion, and provided me guidance on paid/COI editing. The instructions were well written and clearly understandable.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * My submission was reviewed in 6 days


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * I could imagine a legitimate new user, who wouldn't have the foreknowledge that drafts can take a while to be reviewed, would be anxious to know how much longer they have to wait. This could be more proactively shown to the editor (though I appreciate the AfC queue is not a true queue)

Feedback from PavanWiki123 (12 September 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Draft: Draft Raju Gowda


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, instructions were very clear


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * It was quick


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * No suggestions thanks

Feedback from Dsfulker (27 September 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Harold Morrison


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, but I will admit this was my first attempt, so it was challenging. Being a man, I tend to try it first then read the instructions once I'm hopelessly lost. However, in this case, I scanned the instructions, got things started, read through them more carefully, fixed several things I'd overlooked, then really read them and realized that I was in for a bit more work than I originally thought. I still see where there are a number of tweaks needed to make him more clean and proper, but coming from a genealogical research background, it was interesting to attempt to enter things from a slightly different perspective. I found the experience difficult and a bit anxiety-ridden, as each "comment" that was posted or when I had a slight "correction" (added categories prior to approval), I kept thinking that I was going to make someone angry and ruin my chances for approval. Now that I've been through the process once, I'll definitely take my time, try not to make rookie mistakes, and take a deep breath when someone is being helpful and hopefully consider that being noticed and receiving comments and helpful hints is all part of the process.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * It was a bit over a month, I think. I didn't count the exact timeframe.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * I would love if there were coaches who could chat you through the process, but I suspect like many sites, the number of staff who are "online" is very few and probably centered around development and support of the site, and less available for this purpose. Plus such things increase costs, and that's always a challenge. I think the only thing that might be helpful (and may already be there, there was a lot of help information) might be a sample Wikipedia article - one that was done right and shows examples of all the bells and whistles - so that you could look at it in a finished form, look at it in edit mode and see the behind the scenes pieces, and such. And my only other thought was perhaps an official "You Tube" on creation would have been a good thing too. That too might already be out there, but you never know until you ask. Thanks for an interesting and tremendous learning experience.

Feedback from RealKorgi (17 October 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Borschovsky village


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Quickly


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * The page was renamed from Village Council to Village. It's not a Village, its more like a district or zone.

Feedback from 2006nishan178713 (19 October 2021)
Dantak Yes, the instructions were crystal clear. It was reviewed and accepted within 2 days No flaws experienced yet. Good Job Guys!!
 * What was your submission?
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 41.115.1.220 (5 November 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * 2021 South African Hip Hop Awards


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * In less than 5hours it was reviewed and pass Wikipedia article standard


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * No — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.115.1.220 (talk) 18:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Dr Shailendra Rajan (10 November 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Journal of Applied Horticulture


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, but some of the points will be explict if helping videos are available for new editors. Instead of visiting videos from YouTube, wikipedia videos will be more meaningful and help in cultivating an excellent crop of new editors. Some of the new people may lose their patience because they don't want to read too much about the methodology but videos can make the things clear easily. However it was an excellent experience and I would like to add hundreds of articles on various aspects of horticulture science.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Within an expected time and thanks to the dedicated experienced editors in this area


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Adding videos on different steps with examples — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Shailendra Rajan (talk • contribs) 00:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from CT55555 (10 November 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Draft:Oswald_George_Powe


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * The same day


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * No, in this case, the process went perfectly well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CT55555 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from 200.113.230.6 (11 November 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.113.230.6 (talk) 04:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Rdxmen000 (12 November 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

thankyou very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdxmen000 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Zainulabidv (22 November 2021)
Sayyid Abdurahman Imbichikoya Thangal Al-Aydarusi Al-Azhari Yes It took almost 2 months.. but still i'm happy as it got reviewed and approved....
 * What was your submission?
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * as far as my concern, it was unable to get the status of approval. but the help page and chat with technical team resolved my issues.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zainulabidv (talk • contribs) 04:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Ahlesunnatwaljamaatofficial.bd (24 November 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * I'm new in Wikipedia. I want to know how improve and approve my first article.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahlesunnatwaljamaatofficial.bd (talk • contribs) 16:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Bruxton (30 November 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Draft:Ocean Prey


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, very good guidance. It was specific and targeted.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * That first time it was reviewed in about a day. Now I have resubmitted with improvements which were suggested.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * I do not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruxton (talk • contribs) 15:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from GRALISTAIR (9 December 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Draft:West Coast Main Line route modernisation


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Reasonable


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Recent improvements are a great step forward

Feedback from Logosvenator wikiensis (11 December 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Xenocranium


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Within exactly two hours.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * If it is feasible, displaying what class your article would be based on word count may be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logosvenator wikiensis (talk • contribs) 17:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Fridayphilosophy (23 December 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Manual of German Law

A. I think Wiki wants less rather than more in an opening article on a new scholarly subject. So I provided too much information when I started .. but at least that demonstrated that I had researched the online and published sources to an excruciating degree of exactness. B. I think all non-Wiki cites are FNs REFs rather than having the non-Wiki URLs in the text. C. I think I was right to give up for two years since the editor who started reading the page was an expert in Japanese Manga (not sure what that was) and the webpage was on a well-known study of German law.
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * I am trying to be as generous as possible ... this requires me to sort out what I got wrong ...

But this turned out to be a bonus, because the Wiki editor DGG did a spectacular job of clean, trimming and presenting the materials.
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Two years (almost). And when it was deleted after Wiki editors refused to read my corrections, it was not reinstated at my request.

and accept that every change will be resisted ... I apologize for the crass nature of what follows, but I am one of the world's leading experts in parliamentary procedure and practice. There are about 20 at my level in the world and I cover the subject in German, Italian and Catalonian as well. It would kind of nice if I could gently update some of the more important Wiki articles in this area ... and have an experienced editor (that means an editor who is experienced like DGG) tidy up the material so that I can gain Wiki-smarts faster. 'Manual of German Law' was an homage to one of my colleagues who died in January 2021 so this is not specialized knowledge that is imperishable. Thanks for listening. Still not sure how to compliment but I'll keep working at it. Best wishes, Peter
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * There is a long answer to this Q but I'm too new for you to (probably) care. I think what I have to do is to acquire sufficient Wiki culture (less is more, cites in your format)

​Peter J. Aschenbrenner Fellow, Royal Historical Society National Convenor (US) International Commission for the History of Representative and Parliamentary Institutions Annual Contributor, Public Law (Sweet & Maxwell, London) Decisions of the United States Supreme Court (Terms 2015-2020)

British and American Foundings of Parliamentary Science, 1774-1801 (Routledge, 2017) See routledge.com/British-and-American-Foundings-of-Parliamentary-Science-17741801/Aschenbrenner/p/book/9780367881528 The Papers of John Hatsell, Clerk of the House of Commons (Cambridge University Press for the Royal Historical Society, London, 2020; Camden Fifth Series; co-editor) See royalhistsoc.org/publications/camden-series/ James Monroe, John Marshall and 'The Excellence of Our Institutions' (Routledge, 2022, in press) ‘Can Nation-States Self-Stabilize? From Aristotle through Adam Smith to Hans Kelsen’, in Parliaments, Estates & Representation, vol. 41, no. 3 (December 2021), 259-279. doi.org 10.1080/02606755.2021.1949567 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fridayphilosophy (talk • contribs) 19:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from P37307 (24 December 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Charles L. Watkins


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Less than one hour! Great job!


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * I've edited many articles and researched this and that policy or template over the years so I was ahead of the curve and found it easy. At this point, I can't think of anything that would have made the process go smoother.

Feedback from 67.55.151.208 (30 December 2021)

 * What was your submission?


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 34


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.55.151.208 (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from Lord Milner (30 December 2021)

 * What was your submission?
 * Lancelot Storr


 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes (there were no instructions)


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * one month


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Yes. Small submissions, like this, are sometimes dismissed by editors as irrelevant, obscure or too trite.  I don't think that's the case at all, and I'm very happy that you gave this your approval.  Storr, by the way, was a member of the Imperial War Cabinet during World War I.  Thank's for your help, and happy editing!