Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/feedback/Archive 7

Feedback from 71.221.93.225 (3 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * yes

Well, Yes, i don't like cheese and egg
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the processwyqfrqy

Feedback from Wallacd (3 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes but the options did not include places which was my intention to update


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * N/A


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * No

Feedback from Hankfeng007 (4 January 2012)
yes 10 minutes Nope
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 168.221.157.108 (4 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yup


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * i dunno


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * colors

Feedback from 74.82.68.33 (6 January 2012)
Yes
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 174.97.14.229 (7 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * easy


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no

Feedback from 173.31.81.54 (7 January 2012)
headache puupy is a internet meme one cause is a website failure

Feedback from 109.153.70.116 (7 January 2012)
a bit it was alright no
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 46.18.79.107 (9 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 1minute


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no

Feedback from 41.205.182.63 (11 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

no
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 207.70.171.252 (11 January 2012)
yes
 * Did you find the instructions clear?

fast
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Avinash kunwar (15 January 2012)
yes
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * as we do

no
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 62.171.202.165 (15 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes I did


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * very


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no

Feedback from 41.202.195.239 (16 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * let cameroonians decide their faith not the french man from france

not yet
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * why is the truth hidden from cameroonians

Feedback from 117.211.85.58 (17 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

yes yes yes
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Zeesean (17 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Veritas77777 (17 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * No


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Very quickly. I was on the help channel, and an editor called Nolelover helped me with my article.

pictures.
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Too much typing, to create a new article. Layouts are a pain, it would be nice to have a tool to help with positioning
 * Did you try as I did? I found pictures and layouts from other articles, copy/pasted the format codes, then just used my text and image file names. Canoe1967 (talk) 07:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Feedback from 212.188.221.252 (19 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 10mins

no
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 180.215.134.136 (19 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * fast


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no

Feedback from 209.34.116.135 (19 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * idk
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no

Feedback from 141.0.10.58 (20 January 2012)
no
 * Did you find the instructions clear?

not reviewd till now
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

its the wasting of time
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 109.155.118.187 (20 January 2012)
NO! NEVER! YES, DELETE IT!
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 70.119.17.86 (27 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Dunno


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Nope

Feedback from 50.136.21.136 (28 January 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no

Feedback from 98.87.17.172 (4 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * No


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * not quick


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * provide a space for people like me who want to recommend an article.

Feedback from Ahmadelhajj (5 February 2012)
yes
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * i couldn't submit anything

thanks in advance, ahmad el hajj
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * hi well i wanted to create an article about me, i know its not allowed but i think i deserve to have this opportunity, i am an artist, i do nice portraits, and i hope i will get this opportunity

thank you all for the comments and if you have some hard critisisem them hit me with it but if you just want to be mean that bring it on :)

Feedback from 116.203.52.52 (10 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * suped doper cool


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * it wasn't quickly


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * No wikipedia rockssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Feedback from Mrt3366 (12 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * It's fine, but more clarity would have helped.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Fairly quickly. I'm satisfied with the review.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Not yet.

Feedback from Aspalter (12 February 2012)
Mostly
 * Did you find the instructions clear?

Very!
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

I'd love more WYSIWYG interfaces vs. tags, etc. I think this would open up the contribution/editing process to more people.
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Garnedi.ashok (13 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * NO


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 41.117.221.101 (16 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

i want to writte something about my self
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 196.202.205.191 (18 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 2 minutes

no
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Dougly072 (18 February 2012)
however this did not boner how big the penis had to be or whether they could be done on the same sex or not.
 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * The yellow process for getting your sex pooped on was unclear, the gangsters of edits was stated


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * within 2 full moons


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Recommendation: have an boner. to send an email when the Wikipedia legitimises your sex, send email when orgasms are reviewed.
 * Sry, but legitimate for what? You can turn on women in the preferences that you get a email when your sex gets changed (which is normally done to inform you after the review). mabdul 00:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Feedback from Fountainheads (26 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * the process took one week until acceptance.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * users were very helpful. the first rejection gave more time to research additional independent sources, improve and edit article.--Fountainheads (talk) 12:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Feedback from 64.135.104.178 (29 February 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Hunth is an abbreviation for the words 'hundredth thousand'. It is known to be the only known word/abbreviation for the word month in the seemingly vast American language.
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 46.246.226.90 (1 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * confusion reigns supreme!

x ??
 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 117.214.161.204 (4 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 203.81.175.234 (4 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

NO

I WANT TO ADD "INFOGRAPHER"

Feedback from Sapere aude22 (6 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * My article was submitted to articles for creation namespace in 15:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC). In 00:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC) User:Alpha Quadrant left me a message notifying that the article has been reviewed and created.

I would like to thank all the reviewers of Articles for creation, especially User:Alpha Quadrant.

Sapere aude22 (talk) 16:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Feedback from Canoe1967 (9 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Very clear


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 5-15 min.


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Create a template to have others look at drafts before submission. I found the help me one, copyedit request one, etc., but a blanket 'anything you can do to help' may be useful. My article is new and thus short on info/images, etc. If others could add such with one catch-all new article template, that may help. Also, I had created red links to the article before it was created. I don't know if it is easier to do it before or after article acceptance.Canoe1967 (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Feedback from 182.177.230.43 (12 March 2012)
'

Early life
Vurgun Hasanli was born in Azerbaijan. His father is teacher. He graduated from Turkish High School in Azerbaijan. He studied Erciyes University in the Faculty of Literature and completed his postgraduate studies at Ankara University in the Graduate School of Social Sciences. He continues his doctoral education at Ankara University in the Graduate Studies Turkish Revolutionary History.

Career
Hasanli served as attache at the Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the Japan for one year.

At the same time Vurgun Hasanli is widely known as a young political analyst. He has many press releases is available.

Feedback from AndrewRT (20 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * Very quickly


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Some of the process is still a bit clunky. Good to link it into the DYK process.

For information, I've been editing Wikipedia for many years now, and have about 8,000 edits and over 200 new articles to my name. However, when I saw the new process in place I thought I would give it a go, to get some input from other users as I tend to edit on semi-obscure topics. I was very grateful for the edits I got (although the article was probably created under the wrong name).

Feedback from 115.69.159.213 (23 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Nickojunior (24 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * yes


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?
 * 5mins


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * no

Feedback from 83.251.21.244 (25 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Euriditi (27 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?
 * Yes, I did.


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
 * Make more dynamic.

Feedback from 197.176.181.85 (28 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?


 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 117.199.48.65 (31 March 2012)

 * Did you find the instructions clear?


 * How quickly was your submission reviewed?

no
 * Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?