Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War II)


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War II)
This Article has Received Class A on Military History Project after a review. You may find it here. Is it possible to get a A class review for this project ? Thanks Perseus71 (talk) 11:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support. The WPMILHIST standards and review process are fairly rigorous, probably more so than the FA process. That, and I'm seriously unconcerned with the development of the article being nominated and am more than content to let WPMILHIST have the lead in determining the article's quality. -- Born2flie (talk) 14:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Article has been well reviewed and looks solid to me. A couple comments though.  It seems "I./" means the larger organization JG.1 is part of, or something else.  That should be explained in the article (if not already).  Also, it would be good to reduce the number of red links if reasonably possible. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This was the standard Group naming that was followed by Luftwaffe at the time. Its been explained in the "Organization Structure" section. As far as red links are concerned, they refer to people, places and organizations that played an important role in the history of this unit. One could remoe them but out of respect to their contribution, it might be better to keep them.Perseus71 (talk) 03:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If the red link person or thing is notable enough to get an article one day, sure keep it.  Just something to consider.  That's why I added "if reasonably possible" with the request. -Fnlayson (talk) 04:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure I understand. You might want to know that an article was recently started for one of the red links Heinz Knoke! Perseus71 (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * While I'm not a member of this project, I reviewed it for MILHIST's A-class, and all the problems I found there have been dealt with. It appears to be a very good article, with the only impediment to FA that I can foresee is that it could use a bit of a copyedit. – Joe Nu  tter  22:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This article has underwent an independent Copy-Edit by the WP:MIL Editor USER:Patton123. Perseus71 (talk) 03:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.