Wikipedia:WikiProject Bedfordshire/Assessment

Welcome to the WikiProject Bedfordshire Assessment  page.

Like any project, a proper way of assessing and prioritizing articles that fall under our scope is essential. We use the Wikipedia 1.0 project's assessment system, and more information can be found out about this below, along with note's specific to the project. You can also use this page to request an assessment or re-assessment, but please use this page to make any other comments or ask questions about the review process.

Using the template

 * If you have found a page that you feel falls under our scope (anything to do with Bedfordshire), please go on to the article's talk page, and type:

 
 * Thank you! The article has now been tagged an is part of the project. If you would also like to, please assess the article against the criteria below. Once you have decided the article's class, please modify the project template accordingly using the class parameter. For example, if the user believed the article to be of Start class, the template would look like this:

 
 * Once this is done, the article will be automatically added to the corresponding project category, in this case Category:Start-Class Bedfordshire articles. Furthermore, it would be useful to note the infobox status of the article. The three options are:

So if the start class article had a complete infobox, the finished template would look like this:
 * Complete: The article's infobox is fully complete, no further attention needed.
 * Incomplete: The infobox has been started, but requires expansion
 * None: The article currently has no infobox.

 

Assessing Articles
Any Wikipedian can assess articles, whether they are members of the project or not. The template below gives precise information about each criteria and an example,however please read this information as well:
 * Most of the articles in this project are either Start or Stub class. A lot of Start's shouldn't be, they should actually be C. And over time, quite a few articles have expanded beyond Stub class, so please bear this is mind
 * This project currently contains no A-class articles. Remember, that an A class article candidate must be reviewed by another project. The same goes for GA's, FA's and FL's, these should be nominated at WP:GAN, WP:FAC and WP:FLC respectively.
 * NA class is currently the home for any page that is not an article or list. Soon, we are hoping to include more specific categories (see above).
 * Also mentioned above, we currently have no facility to rate articles by importance, but hopefully in the future this will be added.

Instructions
If you request an assement, you will not receive any comments or feedback. If you desire this, please ask for a review. The review will be placed on the article's talk page when finished.


 * To request an assessment of a currently un-assessed article, please type . You may wish to leave additional comments that you feel may be useful to the assessor.
 * To request a re-assessment of a currently assesed article, please type, and then please add notes about why you are requesting the re-assement, the article's current rating and any significant improvements that have been made
 * To request a review please type and then also specify why are you requesting the review.

Current requests for Assesssment

 * ✅, rated as Start-Class. Acather96 (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Current requests for Re-Assessment
- It is rated as stub class the article has been expanded a lot since this assessment which took place back in 2007. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eopsid (talk • contribs) 18:54, 29 June 2011 - Talked about on talk page. The page was greatly improved by the User:Derek Andrews. Eopsid (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅, rated as C-class. Acather96 (talk) 06:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Sorry this took so long - I missed this :D. Re-rated as C-class. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 21:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Current requests for a Review
- Not only was it recommended that I suggest it for review, but also I feel having a second set of eyes on the page would do it the world of good, rather than just mine! :) vie_ascenseur - For the same reasons as the Nexus D&BC page above :) Joe O&#39;Dell (Vie ascenseur) - :) (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Acather96 (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)