Wikipedia:WikiProject Bible/Biblical criticism work group/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Biblical Criticism WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles on biblical criticism. The article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Biblical Criticism project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:biblical criticism articles by quality and Category:biblical criticism articles by importance, which can then be seen in the section below.

Frequently asked questions

 * How can I get an article rated? : Do it yourself or list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * On what basis are assessments made? : Criteria for importance is described in . We have not established project-specific criteria for quality, so we use Template:Grading scheme and Template:Assessment Class Summary.
 * Who can assess articles? : Any Wikipedia contributor
 * Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : Change it or discuss it in the article talk page.
 * Where are articles needing assessment? : At Category:Unassessed biblical criticism articles and in the section below.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Importance scale
An article's importance assessment is generated from the criticism-importance parameter in the WikiProject Bible project banner on its talk page, like this:

Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Note: This is only to rate the article on quality – you may or may not get feedback on the article. If you desire a review, use the peer review process. If you assess an article, please remove it so that other editors will not waste time reviewing the same articles. Thanks!

Edit this section and place request here: