Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Andrew Orlowski

Andrew Orlowski
How much about Wikipedia should remain in this article? He makes it a focus of his works, but self-referencing is quite pointless. -- Zanimum 17:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
 * There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
 * If this article is about a person, please add  along with the required parameters to the article - see Persondata for more information.[?]
 * Please provide citations for all of the s.
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
 * Thanks for this review. --  Zanimum 15:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Yannismarou
A critic of Wikipedia ! This is my review:
 * The lead is too short. Check LEAD.
 * I see a . Fix it.
 * Nothing about his life? Early years? Personal life? Stydies? You go straight to "Early career" and 1992. What about 1966-1992?
 * "Early career" is stubby. I suggest you expand.
 * I see some stubby one-sentence paragraphs. Merge or expand them.
 * "The Register" is full of scattered info, not well-connected with one another, and, subsequently, the prose flow is bad. All this info may be useful, but you should put it in an order.
 * Not all your online references use Template:cite news.
 * The article on Wikipedia is not long. Especially if the rest of the article gets expanded.
 * Trim the "see also" section. After my edit, it has just one link. It would be incorporated somewhere in the main article.--Yannismarou 20:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * What happens when a person keeps their pre-career life private? --  Zanimum 19:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Then, our cabability of improving the article is limited.--Yannismarou 10:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)