Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Katie Hopkins

Katie Hopkins
Myself and some other editors are trying to improve this artice, and I would like to see it at G or F status sometime in the future. Please can you inform us about any changes you think needed to be made and which sections are the poorest. We have previously been informed that the "Romantic Interests" section is poor and suffers from poor sentencing/wording. If you agree, please copy/paste the related sentences here and make any corrections you see fit. Thanks. Dalejenkins 13:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Gran2
Okay, overall its pretty good, and well sourced, but here are a few problems.


 * The image is a fair use image, its needs to go. It either can be replaced by a free use image, (an image you or another ha taken themselves, or has been uploaded by someone else to Flickr under an appropriate license) or just have no image at all.
 * The lead needs to be expanded, with info about here early life and personal life, and any other projects. Also a little more info about her appearance on the Apprentice. See WP:LEAD for more info, the lead needs to summarise the article. The "Exeter, Devon, England" birth location can go in the lead as well. Katie Hopkins (born 1976, in Exeter, Devon, England)
 * I would rename "Romantic Interests" to "Personal life".
 * All section headers should not be capitalised on both words. For example, "Early Life" needs to be "Early life", and so on.
 * Ref 38 is broken.
 * Ref 1 needs to be properly formated with cite news.
 * In the response section (this so very minor, more a personal request), could you change "Love, Actually and Four Weddings and a Funeral writer Richard Curtis" to "Four Weddings and a Funeral and Notting Hill writer Richard Curtis". As his most famous film, FWaaF should go first, and NH was more of a critical and commercial sucess than LA so is probably his second most sucessful film. But this doesn't really matter, as said, it would be a personal request as I got NH to GA status and want to have the article linked as much as possible. Also, the sentence could work fine with just saying "Richard Curtis", as he is a well known person anyway.
 * As for the prose, I'm not really much of a copy-editer. If you don't get many other comments about it from other people, I suggest submitting the article to WP:LOCE.

Hope this helps. Gran2 14:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I've just noticed that most of the refs have (English) written after them. This isn't needed as this is the English Wikipedia, meaning most refs are in English. Its only needed when its in another language. Gran2 17:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Review by karanacs
This article is unfortunately nowhere near GA-ready. If you are willing to do a bit of work you should be able to bring it up to that level, however. The biggest issues are the structure and the fact that the prose is not formal enough. Karanacs 01:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Lead
 * Does Reality TV need to be capitalized? I think this should be lower case
 * "You're Fired leads to a disambig page. It is really necessary?
 * The lead is a tad short -- it should be at least twice this long.
 * An encyclopedia should use a more formal tone, so refer to her as Hopkins instead of Katie. This is also the rule for others, such as Paul Collins (after first reference, refer to him only as Collins, not Paul and not his full name again).
 * The structure of this article needs a lot of work. I think you should try for a more chronological organization.  Instead of having a separate personal life section, incorporate that information into the other parts of the article (it is confusing to talk about her relationship with Paul Callaghan in detail, and then to go back in the Apprentice section and talk about the same relationship.  Likewise, the early life section does not really cover her early life; it's just a hodgepodge of facts about her.
 * A lot of the first half of the article borders on trivia, which shoud not be included in the article. Is it really important that she thinks she can out press up most men?
 * If possible, I'd like to see more information about her professional background. There had to be a reason that she was included on The Apprentice -- what about her previous profession was notable, other than lots of travel?
 * I'd like to see more information about her performance on the Apprentice. Did her team win when she was Project Manager?  What did the tasks include during her project management stint, and what did her teammates think of her leadership skills?  Why was she brought into the boardroom by the other contestants?
 * In what way did the tabloids compare her to real people? A few quotes (if they are printable) might be good.
 * The tone of the article overall also needs to be more encyclopediac. There are many instances, but these are a few that jumped out at me as needing fixing: "hit the headlines," "walked", "slammed"
 * full dates need to be wikilinked (June 12, 2007); partial dates should not be wikilinked (May 2007)
 * Citations
 * Citations should not occur in the middle of sentences; you can consolidate them at the end of the sentence instead.  This helps to improve readability.
 * Need a citation for the salary information
 * Need to use cite news or citation template for the references to newspapers. That will help properly format the names of the newspapers.
 * Must include date of newspaper/tabloid articles, and the author if there was one.
 * The Internet Forum will most likely not be considered a quality source when you get to a GA or FA review. Try to find different sources for those facts.
 * Citations 53, 58 do not have a publisher listed
 * This is not a complete sentence: "Although, Mel Collins found out about both this new affair and the fact that she was expecting another child." Also, who was expecting another child -- Katie or Mel?