Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Assessment

The assessment area of WikiProject Books focuses on assessing the quality of articles within the WikiProject's scope. The resulting article ratings are used to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program.

The ratings are done via inserting information into the WPBooks project banner, which causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Book articles by quality.

Instructions
An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Books project banner on its talk page. Anyone may assess an article as stub, start, C or B in accordance with the grading scheme's assessment criteria. However, you must apply for the GA (Good Article) class at WP:GAN and the FA class at WP:FAC.

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Book articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Request an assessment
For past assessments, see the archive.

If you are not comfortable assessing a particular article you may request another WikiProject member to assess it. Alternatively, you may list it here:
 * 1) Example article. Additional info. ~
 * 2) Homosexuality: Disease or Way of Life?. This article was assessed as start-class by Mikeblas on March 21, 2015 but has been rewritten and greatly expanded since then. Requesting reassessment. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Re-assessed as B-class maclean (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) Virtually Normal. This article was assessed as stub-class by SatyrTN on August 7, 2008 but has been greatly expanded since then. Requesting reassessment. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) Virtual Equality. This article was assessed as stub class on 20 July, 2012, by INeverCry, but has been significantly expanded since then. Requesting reassessment. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 3) Marxism and the Oppression of Women. This article was rated as a stub in December 2012, but has been significantly expanded since then and is no longer a stub. Requesting reassessment. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 4) The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. The article currently lacks an assessment. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Assessed as B-class maclean (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) Gay Science. The article currently lacks an assessment. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 2) The Primal Scream. The article currently lacks an assessment. Requesting one. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 3) Signs of the Flesh. The article currently lacks an assessment. Requesting one. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 4) Psychoanalysis: The Impossible Profession. The article currently lacks an assessment. Requesting one. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 5) Hagarism. The article currently lacks an assessment. Requesting one. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 6) Sex and Reason. The article currently lacks an assessment. Requesting one. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:38, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 7) Ecology, community and lifestyle. The article currently lacks an assessment. Requesting one. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 8) Crito. I recently finished translating the article after it had turned out that it was plagiarized, so I believe a reassessment in in order. puggo (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 9) On Bullshit article, the stub tag was removed but an updated assessment has not been given. Could someone please assess the article. 451blue (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 10) The Tolkien Reader This article is rated start-class, but I have added a significant amount of information to it in the last month, so could someone please reassess it? I did this for a university assignment, and would really appreciate a reassessment. Thanks! --Hofendorf (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Assessment upgraded from Start to C by another editor on December 12: — python coder  (talk &#124; contribs) 14:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Space Demons This article is rated stub-class, but I have added 3000 words of content (including significant research) as part of a university assignment. I would greatly appreciate re-assessment. Thanks so much! Clarkkent1234 (talk) 03:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Clarkkent1234 (Clarkkent1234) 03:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) On China This article was a stub but has now been expanded. A re-evaluation would help significantly. I put a large amount of research in.
 * 3) 28 Stories of AIDS in Africa I just completely redid this article and would welcome an assessment, also more contributions. CT55555 (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) The War on Truth new article by me, requesting an assessment CT55555 (talk) 16:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) God's Philosophers This article was assessed as stub-class in 2009 but I have been improving it for the past month. I believe it's ready to be assessed. Thanks Barbarianhamish (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 6) Gothic double While this article isn't about a specific book, I have expanded it from a stub to include sections about different Gothic books which use the double motif. Please let me know if this article is suitable for this WikiProject, and if so I would really appreciate an assessment. Thank you! Snowdrop Fairy (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 7) Barnaparichay. This article is expanded and not stub anymore and maybe a start or C class. This article needs a reassessment.Prinaki (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality operations
Quality operations: A bot-generated detail log for Book articles.

Popular pages
Popular pages: A bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles.