Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Christianity WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Christianity related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the ChristianityWikiProject project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Christianity articles by quality and Category:Christianity articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

 * How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Christianity WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
 * Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
 * Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Staff
These editors work to assess and categorize articles within the scope of the Christianity project. If you'd like to help, sign your name below.
 * Afaprof01 21:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Vassyana 21:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * FitzColinGerald - Anything related to the Last Supper and other prominent Christian rituals intrigues me greatly.
 * StudentoftheWord 14:45, 17 October 2007 (MST) - Comment: I am a contributor concerning articles concerning Christian Universalism and it's derivitive catagories.
 * John Carter (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Tinucherian (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Kristamaranatha (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ltwin (talk) 06:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * User:Kathanar
 * Swampfire (talk) 00:35, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * HopeChrist (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 20:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Lamorak (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Rak-Tai (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)]]
 * Rowlan - Comment: Interested in the evolution of Christian Theology, Practice and Liturgy; also interested in multiple other aspects of the faith.Rowlan (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * '''Ian Raphael Lopez  :)  (talk)  09:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC) Comment:  I am currently interested in the formation of religion and current Christian practices.
 * The Silver Arrow 16:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * JohnRLambert
 * Cognate247 (talk) 22:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * JohnChrysostom (talk) 07:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Adam in MO Talk 15:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ReformedArsenal (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 19:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Guðsþegn (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Tomh903 (talk) 20:50 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * JohnThorne (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 *  Stalin SunnyTalk2Me 05:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Adamant1 (talk) 08:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Brian (talk) 07:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Popular pages

 * WikiProject Christianity popular pages are updated monthly.

Quality assessments
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the ChristianityWikiProject project banner on its talk page:



The following values may be used for importance assessments:
 * Top - The subject of this article is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. Adds articles to Category:Top-importance Christianity articles
 * High - The subject of this article contributes a depth of knowledge regarding Christianity. Adds articles to Category:High-importance Christianity articles
 * Mid - The article fills in more minor details regarding Christianity in general. Adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Christianity articles
 * Low - The article is about a topic that is mainly of specialist interest in the general field of Christianity. Adds articles to Category:Low-importance Christianity articles
 * Unknown - Any article which has not yet been assessed on the importance scale is automatically added to the Category:Unknown-importance Christianity articles.

Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Once assessed, please add a reply to the request and move the item to 'Completed Assessments'.

Requested Assessments

 * Historiography of the Christianization of the Roman Empire has been retitled and extensively revised by multiple recent editors. It combines three previous articles into a single discussion and is now WP's primary source on this topic. I would like to see a reassessment of its importance accordingly. Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * This article is now GA, but its importance still needs reassessing. Christianization of the Roman Empire redirects to this article, as does Decline of Greco-Roman polytheism which was merged into this article, making this article WP's only discussion of the history of how this religion spread as it did. That seems more important than mid-level imo. Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Christianization has had a total rewrite, is no longer a start class article. Its topic is listed in two places on Religion's Top importance list, so it is probably not correct to continue to classify it as low importance. Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Richard Rhodes Bristow New article Muchclag (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Erasmus Sarcerius is an article I wrote earlier in the year, it would be very much appreciated if someone could take a look at it and assess it. Thanks, EytanMelech (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Luo Wenzao: I significantly expanded this article and it is no longer a stub. It is about the first Chinese Catholic bishop. Many thanks if someone could re-assess it. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Continuing Anglican movement has been updated and expanded. I do not think it is Start-Class anymore - would appreciate a reassessment.
 * Draft:Richard James Waugh New article regarding an ordained minister in New Zealand, all advice before draft submission welcome --Thatusername96 (talk) 12:36, 15 August 2023 (NZT)

Completed Assessments

 * Theology of relational care: This article has some potentially serious issues; it may even be in the wrong broad topic category. At the very least, either the article name is very non-indicative of the article content, or the article content is severely incomplete and overly exlusive. See its Talk page for more details.
 * —Proposed deletion and redirect to Practical Theology. Brian (talk) 18:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Deleted on 27 October 2022.

Assessment log

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

fr:Projet:Christianisme/Évaluation