Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability

The WikiProject College Football Notability guidelines aim to promote the creation of high-quality articles about college football teams and related topics.

Wikipedia contains many articles on topics related to college football. These guidelines are not meant to be all-inclusive. As in all things, in order for an article to exist on Wikipedia, there should be reliable sources of information and the article cannot be original research. Articles must be written in a neutral point of view and not overly complimentory or derogatory to the team or topic.

Opposition to this essay
There has been some opposition to this essay in articles for deletion discussions. Basically the argument boils down to the idea that projects do not get to set their own notability policies (only an essay). Please note that this project agrees with this position. This essay does not attempt to force the rest of Wikipedia to accept these guidelines but instead is providing what the project believes to be reasonable and thoughtful arguments to support notability issues within college football.

West Incident

 * This essay currently does not reflect many of the changes and arguments that rose out of the West incident. You can help by editing the issues into the essay.

Around September of 2008, the so-called "West Incident" occurred. During this short period of time, the article Walter J. West was deleted. Subsequently, many historical college football articles were mass-nominated for deletion. Many of these nominated were deleted after AFD discussion, many citing "West Precedent" as a reason. Subsequent research on part of the College Football project has led to restoration of many of these articles and more are expected to be restored through additional research, including the restoration of the original West article.

As of December 2010, 100% of those articles deleted have been restored or at least merged into useful articles and lists through discovery of additional information, thorough research, and other article improvements. Included in the deleted articles that were restored are notabile people from business, government, professional football, professional basketball, and other areas. With this in mind, WP:SNOW comes to mind as a reason to consider when discussing deletion of college football head coach articles.

WP:NSPORT/WP:ATHLETE
The above is a useful guideline for determining notability of sports related subjects. However, it is only a guideline used to quickly assess whether an athlete is likely notable. If a college football player meets the guidelines provided for college athletes, they are likely notable under WP:GNG. However, if an article meets general notability guidelines it can be created regardless of WP:NSPORT. As a rule of thumb sources establishing notability under WP:GNG need to be independent of the source, reliable and non-routine (see WP:ROUTINE).

Associations
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Associations that govern and otherwise help organize college football are notable. This includes their history, present state, and leadership. Generally, these organizations extend their reach beyond college football into other sports (such as Basketball, track and field, etc.)

This is not intended to be a complete list.

Conferences
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

College football play is typically broken into conferences, where groups of the same schools will play each other each year. This can develop rivalries and a rich history. Sample conferences include the Big Ten Conference, the Mid-States Football Association, and the Kansas Collegiate Athletic Conference.

Defunct conferences are also notable, such as the Big Eight Conference and the Intercollegiate Athletic Association of the Northwest.

This is not intended to be a complete list.

Teams
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Schools that participate in college football and are members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association or the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics are considered notable as long as there are independent, non-routine (see WP:ROUTINE) references documenting their notability. Please note that all NCAA schools are presumed notable, since there will always be reliable independent sources documenting their notability. Participation may be past, present, and/or planned in the future. Schools may have a team page for their football team, an athletic page for all sports teams, and/or an athletics section of the school's main page in Wikipedia.

Vocational schools (such as Apprentice) that regularly compete against NCAA and/or NAIA schools could also be considered notable based on their level of participation, involvement, and history.

Common arguments encountered-teams
The following are some of the common arguments against the notability of a team.

Too Small: It's too small of a school to be notable


 * Please see Arbitrary quantity. The "size" of the school does not disqualify for notability. Notability discussions about a college football team should be centered around the team and not the college (or university).

It's only an NAIA School: NAIA schools are not notable, only NCAA schools count (or NCAA Division I, etc.)


 * Some NAIA schools are notable. For non NCAA schools notability is determined on a school by school basis. Many significant college programs are in the NAIA. College of Emporia was one of the first schools to regularly call the forward pass and halfback option. The consensus of the project is to include NAIA as well as all NCAA division programs in the project.

Program Does Not Exist: The school doesn't have a football program anymore/the school does not exist anymore


 * Notability is not temporary. Many historical achievements in the sport occurred at schools that are either now closed or simply discontinued their football program. Homer Woodson Hargiss is one of the early developers of the Forward Pass and Halfback option play--while coaching at the College of Emporia, a school that closed in 1972. Bill Parcells played at Wichita State University, which discontinued their football program in 1986.

Football is stupid: Football is meaningless and has no academic value, why not write about a professor who makes a difference?


 * Please see WP:IDONTLIKEIT. "Academic value" is not the standard for notability.

Junior College/Club/Intramural
Wikiproject College Football does not include junior college football, club football, or intramural football programs. At the present time, this is primarily due to a lack of interest but also due to notability concerns. Should interest in junior college football reach the point that articles begin to be created, a junior college task force may be created. For similar reasons, schools that play intercollegiate football outside the NCAA or NAIA (such as Sprint Football or club teams) or intramural football teams are not covered by the project, nor are they considered notable, except in instances where there are extenuating circumstances.

To clarify, we're not saying that Junior College football isn't notable, it's just that we're not united and of one voice on the topic yet--and haven't researched it enough to back up any voice with strong reason.


 * There is a List of NCAA Institutions with club football teams, a List of community college football programs, and an article on the National Junior College Athletic Association.

Junior Varsity
Junior-varsity (JV) teams are not considered notable. Articles about Division I JV teams playing NAIA teams are considered notable, but junior varsity college players, coaches, teams, and normal games—unless there are extenuating circumstances—are not considered notable.

Non-college teams that played a college team
In the early days of college football, it was common practice for a high school team, a military team, or even a city club to play a college football team. The games themselves may be notable and under the aegis of this project, as in 1892 Wyoming Seminary vs. Mansfield State Normal football game. However, football teams not considered a part of a college or university are not covered by the project and are not considered notable under it.

Vocational schools such as the Apprentice Builders who regularly schedule games against generally accepted notable college football teams would be included in the project.

Canadian Colleges

 * See WP:CFL

Colleges located in Canada may or may not be covered under this project. There are a handful of colleges in Canada that participate in the NAIA, and thereby would be involved in this project. Colleges that compete in CIS football under the Canadian Interuniversity Sport governing body (the Canadian equivalent to the NCAA) are not a part of this project--WikiProject Canadian football has taken responsibility for those teams. This project applauds their efforts.

Simon Fraser University is a special case. At different times in the past, it has played American football in the NAIA and Canadian football in CIS. SFU is now an NCAA Division II member, and is playing American football again.

There are some "crossover" colleges (such as University of Victoria) where teams play in both NAIA and CIS. In such cases, both projects work together with the Canadian efforts taking the lead.

Marching Bands

 * See WP:Marching band

Marching bands are typically considered part of the pageantry of college football. However, there is a wonderful team at WikiProject Marching band that is taking care of all marching band issues (we refer to their project as "living across the street" from ours). Marching bands are not typically considered part of Wikiproject College football.

There are times when the marching band and the football game have interacted. The Play is one specific example. On those occasions, editors are encouraged to coordinate with the related project (in this case, the band).

Single seasons
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Single seasons (e.g. 2005 USC Trojans football team) can be considered notable. In this case the season must receive substantial non-routine coverage (see WP:ROUTINE). In general, seasons that culminate in a bowl game will likely be notable. However, not all seasons by teams that participate in college football are inherently notable.

Sometimes editors choose to group multiple seasons together into articles, depending on available content and interest. Examples are LSU Tigers football, 1893-1899 and Arkansas Razorbacks football, 1900-1909.

Common arguments encountered-seasons
Every team's season does not deserve an article: Wikipedia does not need individual pages for every season of every team.


 * As long as the sourcing is not solely from the team website, and local routine articles on regular season games, Why not? (But it's probably not going to happen...) Content should be of high quality, and be well documented by sources independent of the sport and school. Many team individual season pages are well-assembled and often used, such as 2005 Texas Longhorn football team.  Others may call for a grouping of seasons by decade or coach's tenure, depending on the content.  While some of the seasons themselves are notable, often times multiple seasons are combined into one article.

Far too detailed for any team, let alone a college team. Wikipedia does not need this much information on college football.


 * please see WP:IDONTLIKEIT and Article size. The project editors and team members desire to create the best articles possible, and the size of an article can have a significant bearing on that. However, that is a style issue and not a notability issue.  If an article is too long then it most certainly should be edited.  That said, consensus in the project and on Wikipdeia in general has repeatedly supported detailed single season articles of college football teams, as long as they are sourced by non-routine coverage independent of the sport and school.

Not Everything Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed


 * See WP:EVERYTHING and WP:NOTHING. While Wikipedia is not everything, it is not about "nothing" either. Therefore, the community creates guidelines and policies outlining what qualifies for inclusion and how to come to consensus.

Not Indiscriminate Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.


 * See WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The "Indiscriminate" section of the What Wikipedia is not policy gives five specific classifications of indiscriminate information:  "Frequently Asked Questions", "Plot summaries", "Lyrics databases", "Statistics", and "News reports."  The last two may apply to college football articles. This project agrees that if no prose can be created in a season page, then that page should be combined elsewhere. However statistics may be a valuable part of an article.


 * News reports-- WP:ROUTINE does explicitly suggest that news reports on games does not automatically count towards establishing notability of the games. There is currently no consensus as to whether this argument counts towards full seasons. Generally there should be at least one other reference besides game play summaries, news reports, and statistics in establishing notability.

No fan pages. Wikipedia is not the place for fan pages for college football.


 * Please avoid Ad hominem arguments. Yes, "fan pages" should be avoided. However, this does not mean that people should not edit pages related to their favorite teams, as long as they maintain a neutral point of view.

Keep

 * 2016 Shepherd Rams football team (Nov 2021) [Div II seminfinalist]
 * 1968 Whitewater State Warhawks football team (Oct 2021) [NAIA]
 * 1968 Eastern Illinois Panthers football team (Oct 2021) [College Division]
 * 1985 Iowa Hawkeyes football team (Keep October 2020) [currently Div. I FBS]
 * 2020 Tarleton State Texans football team (Keep Feb 2020) [currenty Div. I FCS]
 * 2020 Abilene Christian Wildcats football team (Keep Feb 2020) [currently Div. I FCS]
 * 1973 San Diego Toreros football team (Keep Nov 2019) [Div. III at the time, currently Div. I FCS]
 * 2018 Saint John's Johnnies football team (Keep Nov 2019) [currently Div. III]
 * 1974 Boston University Terriers football team (Keep Feb. 2018) [program discontinued in 1998, was Div. II at the time]
 * 1905 Wabash Little Giants football team (Keep July 2017) [currently Div. III]
 * 1919 Colorado Silver and Gold football team (Keep Dec. 2016) [currently Div. I FBS]
 * 1947 Washington State Cougars football team (Keep Dec. 2016) [currently Div. I FBS]
 * 1922 Washington State Cougars football team (Keep Oct. 2016) [currently Div. I FBS]
 * 1934 Michigan State Normal Hurons football team (Speedy keep July 2016) [currently Div. I FBS]
 * 1887 Navy Midshipmen football team (Keep July 2015) [currently Division I FBS]
 * 2015 Penn Quakers football team (Keep Mar. 2015) [Div. I FCS]
 * 2004 Arkansas State Indians football team (Keep Dec. 2013) [Div. I FCS]
 * 2013 Elon Phoenix football team (Keep Aug. 2013) [Div. I FCS]
 * 2009 Liberty Flames football team (Keep May 2013) [Div. I FCS]
 * 1899 VMI Keydets football team (Keep July 2011) [currently Div. I FCS]
 * 2005 Northern Iowa Panthers football team (Speedy keep Oct. 2008) [currently Div. I FBS]
 * 2001 North Dakota Fighting Sioux football team (Keep Sep. 2008) [currently Div. I FCS]
 * 2005 California Golden Bears football team (Keep July 2008) [Div. I FBS]
 * 2008 Oregon Ducks football team (Keep July 2008) [Div. I FBS]

Delete, merge, or redirect

 * 2021 Lock Haven Bald Eagles football team (Redirect Nov 2021) [Division II]
 * 2017 Lock Haven Bald Eagles football team (Redirect Nov 2021) [Div II]
 * 1998 Saint Francis Cougars football team (Redirect Nov 2021) [NAIA]
 * 1879 Swarthmore Garnet Tide football team (Merge Sep 2021)
 * 2014 Chicago Maroons football team (Redirect Feb 2021)
 * 2016 WPI Engineers football team (Redirect Feb 2021) [Division III]
 * 2015 Hampden–Sydney Tigers football team (Redirect Nov 2020) [Division III]
 * 2016 Hampden–Sydney Tigers football team (Rediirect Nov 2020) [Division III]
 * 2016 Chicago Maroons football team (Delete Nov 2019) [Division III]
 * 2015 Chicago Maroons football team (Delete Nov 2019) [Division III]
 * 2017 Olivet Comets football team (Redirect Nov 2019) [Division III]
 * 2013 Olivet Comets football team (Redirect Nov 2019) [Division III]
 * 2012 Olivet Comets football team (Redirect Nov 2019) [Division III]
 * 2014 Olivet Comets football team (Redirect Nov 2019) [Division III]
 * 2018 Olivet Comets football team (Redirect Nov 2019) [Division III]
 * 2017 Angelo State Rams football team (Delete Aug 2018) [Division II]
 * 2018 Angelo State Rams football team (Delete Aug 2018) [Division II]
 * 2017 Wisconsin–Whitewater Warhawks football team (Merge Feb 2018) [Div III]
 * 1882 Hamline Pipers football team (Delete Nov. 2017) [currently Division III]
 * 1883 Carleton Knights football team (Merge Oct. 2017) [currently Division III]
 * 2016 USC Trojans football team (Delete May 2015) [Division I FBS, "premature"]
 * 2009 Buffalo State Bengals football team (Delete Apr. 2013) [Div. III]
 * 2008 St. Norbert Green Knights football team (Delete Apr. 2013) [Div. III]
 * 1905 Howard Bulldogs football team (Delete Apr. 2013) [currently Div. I FCS]
 * 2012 Chicago Maroons football team (Delete Jan. 2013) [Div III]
 * 2011 VCU Rams football team (Redirect to VCU Rams Sep. 2011) ["club" team]
 * 2010 Tabor Bluejays football team (Speedy delete/userfy June 2010) [NAIA]
 * 2007 Coshocton Redskins football team (Delete May 2009) [high school]

No consensus

 * 1897 Indiana State Sycamores football team (No consensus Oct. 2017) [currently Div. I FCS]
 * 2012 Buffalo State Bengals football team (No consensus Jan. 2013) [Div. III]
 * 2006-2008 Southern Oregon Raiders football teams (No consensus Oct. 2008) [NAIA]

Single games
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Conference championship games and bowl games are normally considered notable for all schools that participate in college football and are members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association or the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics. Junior varsity games are generally not considered notable. Realize that every article must still meet WP:N notability standards.

Common arguments encountered-games
Too Many: ''Every team, every game? With over 300 teams with ten games a season over 100 season, that's 150,000 games!''


 * As long as the game meets WP:GNG standards, with coverage beyond WP:ROUTINE sources (such as lists of final game scores and articles on non-notable play by play summaries) the game is notable.


 * Note:editors are encouraged to first create a season summary article before creating individual game articles unless there is a a very unique reason to have a particular game stand out, such as 1892 Wyoming Seminary vs. Mansfield State Normal football game (the first ever nighttime football game.

This Game/That Game: There is no article on College A vs College B, why should Wikipedia have an article on College C vs College D?


 * Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF

'''No Team? No Article.' If the teams don't deserve articles the game doesn't either.''


 * Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF

Nothing Special This is just another football game that's hardly distinguishable from the other football games of this season


 * Specialist Topic. Not all games receive the same amount of coverage. Those that only receive WP:ROUTINE coverage are not notable. For example, if a game gets front page coverage in a national paper, this coverage is not likely routine, and hence would qualify the game for its own page.

This is for WikiNews People should instead write those articles at Wikinews and use inter-wiki linking.


 * Wikipedia is only for notable games, while WikiNews is for all games. Please consult the notability guidelines to determine whether the appropriate source for the article.

Repeating Information This article just repeats information that can be found elsewhere.


 * All Wikipedia articles are written about information that can be found elsewhere, otherwise the information would not be reliable. The purpose of Wikipedia is to remain encyclopedic

Not Encyclopedic Individual articles on football are not encyclopedic.


 * Articles on notable games should be encyclopedic. If an editor gives a reason behind the label of "unencyclopedic" then those issues should be addressed.

Single game notability discussion library

 * Articles for deletion/2010 Fountain City Classic (pending)
 * Articles for deletion/2012 Texas A&M vs. Alabama football game (Delete Feb 2019)
 * Articles for deletion/1939 Nebraska vs. Kansas State football game (Merge June 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/2018 Cotton Bowl Classic (Keep Mar. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/1982 Tobacco Bowl (Redirect Dec. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Goal Line Stand from Tigerland (Delete July 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2005 Texas vs. Ohio State football game (2nd nomination) (Keep Apr. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2007 Texas vs. Oklahoma State football game (Delete Apr. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2005 Oklahoma vs. Texas football game (Delete Apr. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2008 Texas vs. Oklahoma football game (Delete Apr. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2005 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game (2nd nomination) (Delete Mar. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/List of Texas Longhorns football games (Delete Mar. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2017 Pac-12 Football Championship Game (Keep Mar. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2011 Oklahoma State vs. Iowa State football game (Keep Jan. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2018 College Football Playoff National Championship (Keep Jan. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/2007 Backyard Brawl (Keep Dec. 2016)
 * Articles for deletion/2015 Florida State vs. Georgia Tech football game (Delete Nov. 2015)
 * Articles for deletion/Michigan State Miracle (Redirect Oct. 2015)
 * Articles for deletion/1981 Aloha Bowl (Delete Jan. 2015)
 * Articles for deletion/1996 UCLA at Tennessee football game (Delete Dec. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2007 Pittsburgh vs. West Virginia football game (Delete Nov. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/"13-10" (Delete Nov. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2008 Texas vs. Texas Tech football game (No consensus Nov. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2008 Oregon vs. Oregon State football game (Delete Nov. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2007 Missouri vs. Kansas football game (Delete Nov. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2014 Chick-fil-A Kickoff Game (Delete Oct. 2014)
 * 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and Articles for deletion/2013 Chick-fil-A Kickoff Game (Delete all Oct. 2014)
 * 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and Articles for deletion/2014 Cowboys Classic (Delete all Oct. 2014)
 * 2013 and Articles for deletion/2014 AdvoCare Texas Kickoff (Delete both Oct. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/The Cam-Back (Delete Oct. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/Under the Lights III (Delete Oct. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2001 Tennessee vs. Florida football game (Delete Oct. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/1996 Texas Tech vs. Kansas State football game (Delete Oct. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2013 Alabama vs. Texas A&M football game (Delete Oct. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2015 College Football Championship Game (Keep Jan. 2014)
 * Articles for deletion/2006 USC vs. UCLA football game (Delete May 2012)
 * Articles for deletion/2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game (Delete April 2012)
 * Articles for deletion/2012 ACC Championship Game (No consensus Feb. 2012)
 * Articles for deletion/Nebraska vs Ohio State (The Lazarus Game) (Merge Nov. 2011)
 * Articles for deletion/1972 Michigan vs. Navy football game (Merge Nov. 2010)
 * Articles for deletion/Georgia Tech 222, Cumberland 0 (article renamed 1916 Cumberland vs. Georgia Tech football game (Keep Jan. 2006)
 * Articles for deletion/2005 Texas vs. Texas A&M football game (Kept 2007, but deleted on 2nd AfD 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Bush Push (article renamed 2005 USC vs. Notre Dame football game) (Keep 2006)

Special plays
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

A "play" in college football refers to one particular session or down, and the specific orders given to the players. Sometimes these orders are executed exactly, and sometimes improvisation takes over and conclude different than intended. Normal plays such as the kickoff or screen pass are standard plays and are considered notable because they are such a core part of the game. Many of these plays are actually a part of our parent project WikiProject American football and may be shared with other projects such as WikiProject Rugby league.

While a general play may be notable, not every application of that play is considered notable. For example, the forward pass is certainly notable as an integral part of the game, but every time the forward pass is used would not warrant an article on that specific play.

That said, college football generates unique plays from time to time. Some of these plays are analyzed and reviewed and referenced throughout the ages. The Play is one example, which is a part of the category American football plays. These plays gain notability through their uniqueness.

Awards
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Major national college football awards and their recipients are considered notable. A list of the major college awards can be found on the Template:College Football Awards. Note that conference awards, including All-conference team selections, are not automatically considered notable. Discussion of what constitutes a notable award is handled at that template page.

Rivalry/series AfD library
No guideline has been adopted by this project with respect to which college football rivalries and/or series are deemed notable. Accordingly, more general reference should be made to WP:NRIVALRY and WP:GNG. Prior AfD discussions in this area (collected here) also provide some guidance as to how the community has dealt with such issues.

Keep

 * 1) Kansas–Nebraska football rivalry (Keep June 2019)
 * 2) Alabama–Clemson football rivalry (Keep Jan 2019)
 * 3) Georgia-Vanderbilt football rivalry (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 4) Alabama-Penn State football rivalry (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 5) Auburn-Florida football rivalry (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 6) Auburn-Tulane football rivalry (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 7) Auburn-Tennessee (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 8) Rice-Texas football rivalry (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 9) Auburn-Georgia Tech football rivalry (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 10) James Madison-Richmond football rivalry (Keep Aug 2018)
 * 11) Idaho–Idaho State football rivalry (Keep Jan 2018)
 * 12) Central Washington–Western Washington football rivalry (Keep Jan 2018)
 * 13) O'Rourke–McFadden Trophy (Keep Dec 2017)
 * 14) Fresno State–Hawaii football rivalry (Keep Dec 2017)
 * 15) Illinois–Michigan football series (Keep Nov 2017)
 * 16) Miami–Nebraska football rivalry (Keep Oct 2016)
 * 17) Alabama–Ole Miss football rivalry (Keep Sept 2016)
 * 18) Iowa–Nebraska football rivalry (Keep Sept 2016)
 * 19) Georgia Tech–Tennessee football rivalry (Keep Oct 2015)
 * 20) Civil Conflict (UConn-UCF) (Keep July 2015)
 * 21) East Carolina–Marshall football rivalry (Keep April 2015)
 * 22) Minnesota–Nebraska football rivalry (Keep Dec 2014)
 * 23) Stanford–USC football rivalry (Keep Sept 2014)
 * 24) Northwestern–Notre Dame football rivalry (Keep Oct 2013)
 * 25) Georgia–South Carolina football rivalry (Keep May 2012)
 * 26) Alabama–Penn State football rivalry (Keep Nov 2011)
 * 27) Ramnapping Trophy (UConn-Rhode Island) (Keep Sept 2011)
 * 28) Auburn-Florida football rivalry (Keep Aug 2011)

Delete

 * 1) North Texas–UTSA football rivalry (Delete Nov 2018)
 * 2) Houston–Texas football rivalry (Delete Nov 2018)
 * 3) Brown–Princeton football rivalry (Delete Sept 2018)
 * 4) Brown–Penn football rivalry (Delete Sept 2018)
 * 5) Columbia–Harvard football rivalry (Delete Aug 2017)
 * 6) Penn State-Temple football rivalry (Delete Aug 2018)
 * 7) Troy-UAB football rivalry (Delete Aug 2018)
 * 8) Southern Miss-UAB football rivalry (Delete Aug 2018)
 * 9) Maryland-Rutgers football rivalry (Delete Aug 2018)
 * 10) Georgia Tech-Tulane football rivalry (Delete Aug 2018)
 * 11) Arkansas-Auburn football rivalry (Delete Aug 2018)
 * 12) UTEP-UTSA football rivalry (Delete Aug 2018)
 * 13) Georgia-Ole Miss football rivalry (Delete July 2018)
 * 14) Arkansas-Mississippi State football rivalry (Delete July 2018)
 * 15) Louisville-Virginia football rivalry (Delete July 2018)
 * 16) Southern Oregon–Western Oregon football rivalry (Delete Jan 2018)
 * 17) Marshall–Western Kentucky football rivalry (Delete Jan 2018)
 * 18) Cumberlands–Union football rivalry (Delete Dec 2017)
 * 19) New Mexico–Utah football rivalry (Delete Dec 2017)
 * 20) Iowa State–West Virginia football rivalry (Delete Dec 2017)
 * 21) North Texas–Rice football rivalry (Delete Nov 2017)
 * 22) Fresno State–Louisiana Tech football rivalry (Delete June 2017)
 * 23) Oklahoma State–Baylor football rivalry (Delete Aug 2016)
 * 24) Arkansas State–Louisiana-Monroe football rivalry (Delete April 2016)
 * 25) BYU–San Diego State football rivalry (Delete April 2016)
 * 26) Arkansas-Georgia football rivalry (Delete March 2016)
 * 27) Florida State–Georgia Tech football rivalry (Delete Dec 2015)
 * 28) Ole Miss–Tennessee football rivalry (Delete Oct 2015)
 * 29) South Carolina–Tennessee football rivalry (Delete Oct 2015)
 * 30) Auburn–Florida State football rivalry (Delete Feb 2015)
 * 31) Troy–UAB football rivalry (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 32) Southern Miss–UAB football rivalry (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 33) Battle for the Bone (Fresno St-La. Tech) (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 34) James Madison–Old Dominion football rivalry (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 35) Battle for the Silver Mace (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 36) UAB–Memphis rivalry (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 37) The Dam Cup (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 38) HintonBurdick Grand Canyon Trophy (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 39) Marshall–UCF football rivalry (Delete Dec 2014)
 * 40) Arkansas–Missouri football rivalry (Delete Sept 2014)
 * 41) Arkansas-Baylor football rivalry (Delete Aug 2014)
 * 42) Mississippi State - Vanderbilt football rivalry (Delete Aug 2014)
 * 43) Missouri–South Carolina football rivalry (Delete Aug 2014)
 * 44) Florida–South Carolina football rivalry (Delete July 2014)
 * 45) D.C. Cup (Georgetown-Howard) (Delete July 2014)
 * 46) Ole Miss - Notre Dame football series (Delete March 2014)
 * 47) Alabama–Texas A&M football rivalry (Delete Nov 2012)
 * 48) Florida–Alabama football rivalry (Delete Nov 2012)
 * 49) Louisville–West Virginia rivalry (Delete Sept 2012)
 * 50) Alabama–LSU football rivalry (Delete Aug 2012)
 * 51) Drake–Dayton football rivalry (Delete Dec 2011)
 * 52) River City Showdown (Delete Dec 2011)

Merge, move, no consensus, other

 * 1) North Texas–UTSA football rivalry (No consensus Aug 2018)
 * 2) Iowa-Penn State Rivalry (Keep but re-purpose with wrestling Sept 2017)
 * 3) Georgia Southern–Georgia State football rivalry (Keep but move to Georgia Southern–Georgia State rivalry to encompass basketball/volleyball Oct 2015)
 * 4) Auburn–Tulane football rivalry (No consensus Feb 2015)
 * 5) $5 Bits of Wooden Chair (Merge to Minnesota–Nebraska football rivalry Dec 2014)

Other events
General pageantry and special events dealing with college football outside of the game itself are typically listed on the page of the college hosting the event. In the rare instance that the event is notable enough to support a standalone page, it may fall under the aegis of the College Football Wikiproject. If the event was founded to promote a college football team or to commemorate a particular game, consider it a part of the project. The Aggie Bonfire, a featured article once on the main page, is one such example.

Lists
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.


 * For more details see the essay Lists in Wikipedia

Due to the nature of college football and the fact that the subject is underrepresented on Wikipedia, it may be preferable to present information in list format. List topics are notable if they deal with a school, individual, football conference, or other organization that is itself notable under the guidelines listed on this page. No list describing an aspect of a non-notable subject can be notable. Notable subjects can have non-notable lists, however. Editors are advised to use their judgment when composing list-style information. An article entitled List of Maryland Terrapins football fans will not be notable. A list entitled Maryland Terrapins NFL Draft picks, on the other hand, will be notable.

Locations
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection. Locations where Division I college football is regularly played are considered notable. These locations include both current and historic locations, and can cover on-campus stadiums or off-campus stadiums. For teams at lower levels, such locations may or may not be notable.

Some locations other than stadiums are notable, such as NCAA Hall of Champions. Other locations relevant to college football may not be notable. Such non-notable locations include locker rooms, practice facilities, administrative buildings, etc. However, those locations may have achieved notability through other methods.

Players
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Wikipedians have yet to come to consensus what guidelines should be standard for college football athletes. There have been many heated discussions at WP:ATHLETE that are worth reviewing.

The college football project tends to interpret notability standards to include players that:
 * went on to play in the NFL, AFL, or CFL (or other comparable professional leagues)
 * went on to be a head coach in the NFL, AFL, or CFL (or other comparable professional leagues)
 * were inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame
 * won major national awards such as the Heisman Trophy, Outland Trophy, Wuerffel Trophy, Doak Walker Award, or other similar trophy
 * developed a special play (as described in the special play section) and is widely credited as its originator by reliable secondary sources. Merely participating in a special play is not necessarily notable.
 * otherwise achieve notability outside of college football as documented by reliable secondary sources.

However the project has not reached a consensus about how to apply these guidelines to active college football players. Most of the guidelines above apply only to historic players that have left active play in college football and gone on to other achievements like professional sports or coaching. This is not to say that current active players cannot be notable nor does it mean that every player on every team should have an article. It simply means that a set of guidelines or rules has not been established by consensus on this particular issue.

Before creating an article on an individual player, consider what makes them notable for an article and whether there are sufficient sources available to write a good article. Articles on living or recently deceased players must conform to the policy on biographies of living persons.

Common arguments encountered-players
The following are some of the common arguments encountered against notability of a college football player.

Non-Notable: The player does not meet WP:BIO


 * WP:BIO states that college athletes can be notable if they meet WP:GNG. Players at the collegiate level can meet this notability requirement based on non routine (WP:ROUTINE) secondary sources published about their playing career.

Existence of NFL disqualifies college football The "highest level in amateur sports" section of notability from WP:ATHLETE does not apply to team sports if there's also fully professional league in the country.


 * no where in any of the WP Guidelines is this supported. WP:NSPORT is the new athletic guideline, old WP:ATH arguments do not apply.

The player is a bench-warmer The athlete does not play or hasn't played very much.


 * The Short Answer: Specialist Topics are often not well known. Notability in college football is established by WP:GNG, while normally this comes from being an active player, is not always the case. For examples see, Katie Hnida and Daniel Ruettiger, players with little playing time but accomplishing a noteworthy place in college football.

Every player does not deserve an article: There are too many players and pages throughout history for every college football player to have an article on Wikipedia.


 * This is true, but has nothing to do with whether a specific player is notable or not.

No information: The article is really short and has no information.


 * Surmountable problem and Perceived lack of quality or length is not a reason for deletion. Notability is determined by sourcing not a word count.

No value to society It is a shame society places so much value on football, when educators like (your favorite college professor) go unnoticed.


 * Notability is established based on guidelines, perceived value to society is not one of those guidelines. Please consult WP:IDONTLIKEIT.

Too long ago This player hasn't done anything since college, and that was a long time ago


 * Please consult Notability is not temporary.

Just an NAIA player This player only played for an NAIA school and is not notable


 * Just being an NAIA player does not make that player "non-notable" -- while NAIA players are less likely to be notable, there are several who satisfy WP:GNG.

Nothing on Google I did a Google search and can't find much of anything on this player


 * Please see WP:GOOGLEHITS. Google is in general a first tool for checking notability but lack of hits from an internet search engine does not guarantee a lack of notability, especially for historic figures.

Keep

 * Lucas Niang (Aug 2019) [OT Texas Tech]]
 * Eric Thomas (Aug 2019) [WR Troy]
 * James Gayle (July 2019) [LB Va Tech]
 * Kip Smith (June 2019) [punter Okla St]
 * Devante Davis (June 2019) [WR UNLV]
 * Omarius Hines (May 2019) [TE/WR Florida]
 * Diocemy Saint Juste (Sept 2018) [RB Hawaii]
 * Devon Cajuste (Sept 2018) [TE Stanford]
 * Kevin Jurovich (Sept 2018) [WR San Jose State]
 * Darius Leonard (March 2018) [LB South Carolina St.]
 * Dalton Crossan (March 2018) [RB New Hampshire]
 * Micah Parsons (Dec. 2017) [DE/LB at Penn St.]
 * Richard O'Shaughnessy (Dec. 2017) [center/captain at Michigan, 1st team All-Big 10]
 * Jimmie Kaylor (Dec 2017) [punter at Colorado St.]
 * James Aiono (Oct. 2017) [DE at Utah]
 * Articles for deletion/Deontay Burnett (Sept. 2017) [WR at USC]
 * Articles for deletion/Billy Jack Haskins (2nd nomination) (Sept. 2017) [QB at Kentucky]
 * Articles for deletion/Nick Waisome (Sept. 2017) [CB at Florida St.]
 * Articles for deletion/Elijah Fields (Aug. 2017) [DB/LB at Pittsburgh]
 * Articles for deletion/Joe Jackson (defensive end, born 1996) (Aug 2017) [DE at Miami (FL)]
 * Articles for deletion/Will Monday (2nd nomination) (Aug 2017) [punter at Duke]
 * Articles for deletion/Sean Maguire (American football) (Aug 2017) [QB at Florida St.]
 * Articles for deletion/Demario Richard (June 2017) [RB at Ariz. St. with 5,500 career all-purpose yards]
 * Articles for deletion/Nate Hairston (May 2017) [CB at Temple, went on to play in NFL]
 * Articles for deletion/Chad Wheeler (April 2017) [OT at USC, went on to play in NFL]
 * Articles for deletion/Cameron Judge (April 2017) [LB at UCLA, went on to play in CFL]
 * Articles for deletion/Ronald Jones II (March 2017) [1,000 yard rusher for USC]
 * Articles for deletion/Montell Cozart (March 2017) [QB at Kansas/Boise St.]
 * Articles for deletion/Jon Abbate (2nd nomination) (Feb 2017) [LB at Wake Forest; 3x 1st-team All-ACC]
 * Articles for deletion/Marcus Williams (safety) (Jan 2017) [safety at Utah, went on to play in NFL]
 * Articles for deletion/Trace McSorley (Nov 2016) [QB at Penn St.]

Delete

 * C.J. Germany (July 2019) [Div II player]
 * Marquez North (July 2019) [WR Tennessee]
 * Robert Martin (June 2019) [RB Rutgers]
 * P.J. Jones (June 2019) [DT Mississippi St.]
 * Mike Coccia (June 2019) [lineman New Hampshire] (FCS)
 * Jordan DeWalt-Ondijo (June 2019) [LB Duke]
 * Tra Boger (June 2019) [LB Tulane]
 * Carlo Kemp (June 2019) [DT Michigan]]
 * Boris Anyama (June 2019) [LB Louisiana-Lafayette]
 * Danny Anthrop (May 2019) [WR Purdue]
 * Steve Skelton (May 2019) [TE Fordham] (FCS)
 * Gavin Lutman (May 2019) [WR Pittsburgh State] (Div II)
 * Olamide Zaccheaus (May 2019) [RB Virginia]
 * Pooka Williams (Sept 2018) [RB Kansas]
 * Jimmy Pruitt (Sept 2018) [CB San Jose St]
 * Justin Seaverns (Sept 2018) [LB Appalachian State]
 * Kyle Reed (Sept 2018) [QB San Jose St]
 * De'Leon Eskridge (Sept 2018) [RB San Jose St]
 * Chandler Jones (Sept 2018) [WR San Jose St]
 * Nesta Silvera (Sept 2018) [CB Miami]
 * Peli Anau (June 2018) [DT No. Arizona]
 * Brett Nottingham (June 2018) [QB Columbia]
 * Bob Parish (May 2018)
 * Zamir Cobb (March 2018) [WR Temple]
 * Articles for deletion/Duke Ejiofor (March 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Tony DeNiro (2nd nomination) (Jan. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Braxton Pfaff Jan. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Casey Martin (Football) (Jan. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Eric Liles (Dec. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Robert Eeuwes (Nov. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Craig Bearss (Oct. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Kinyumba Mutakabbir (Oct. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Tavares Bowens (Sept. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Noel Phillips (Sept. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Darius Allen (Sept. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Lawrence Erekosima (Sept. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Adam Edwards III (July 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Sha-ron Edwards (June 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Michael Onyemaobi (May 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Steven Scheu (April 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Earvin Venzant, Jr. (April 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Mike Blackstone (April 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Steve Gatena (4th nomination) (April 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Jordan Holland (April 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Judge (Mar 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Kevrette Brown (Mar 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Luis Perez (football) (Feb. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Kevin Wuthrich (Jan 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Luke Albers (Oct 2016)
 * Articles for deletion/Jack Bramswig (Oct 2016)

No consensus

 * Kody Bliss (July 2019) [punter Tennessee]]
 * Kenneth Walker III (Feb 2018)
 * Chris Norton (Feb. 2018)
 * Mason Espinosa (Nov 2017)
 * Jonnu Smith (May 2017)
 * Matt Feiler (Feb 2016)
 * Derek Buttles (Oct 2015)

Userfy

 * Articles for deletion/John Kling (American football) (Feb. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Bo Lacy (Dec. 2017)

Coaches
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Our project considers all head coaches (past and present) of notable college football programs to be notable. Notable college football programs are further defined as NCAA (Division I FBS, Division I FCS, Division II, and Division III) and NAIA programs. This notability holds true provided that they coached a team for at least one official game.

Editors in the college football project know that there are editors outside the project who think this is an abuse of notability and do not like that it will create many stub articles. It also can be opposed by the "Notability is inherited" argument. However, there is a good deal of reasoning for this stance--enough, project consensus believes, to outweigh any inherited notability issues.


 * 1) Researchers on college football find it helpful to view what a peer coach had done in the same school, conference, or league--even if only for one season.
 * 2) For most schools, the head football coach is oftentimes the most well-known (and highest paid) member of the faculty of that school--more than the college president, athletic director, dean of students, or head of the math department.
 * 3) For just about any college, a significant amount of the media coverage is about the major sports program (football, basketball, etc.).
 * 4) The information is notable because statistics on the program are compiled and maintained across all time, and are readily available from multiple sources both on and off the internet.
 * 5) As our research grows, editors have found more and more coaches "inter-connect" between colleges.  Coaches may start at one school, then take a coaching position at another, and end up at a third or fourth school.  Harold Elliott is just one of many examples of articles that started out as just such a stub and has grown to a robust article.
 * 6) Creating even a stub article promotes collaborative editing over time.  Coaches move on to new schools, editors become enthusiastic about their new coach, historical information surfaces, and so forth.
 * 7) This criterion (and subsequent "inherited notability") ensures that the project coverage of college football coaches will be complete.  It also prevents "redlining" in the coach's navbox that is standard for each coach page.

Common arguments encountered-coaches
The following are some of the common arguments encountered against notability of a head coach.

Does not meet standards: The subjects do not meet any part of WP:BIO


 * Head coaches at the collegiate level meet the notability requirement if they satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSPORT.

No Team Article: ''The team which they managed does not even have its own article. Surely if the team they managed was anyway notable it'd have its own article.''


 * See WP:OTHERSTUFF

Sources Unreliable: ''The articles contain no citations from reliable sources, which are required under the verifiability policy.


 * Please see Verifiability and WikiProject College football/Reliable Sources. All articles should contain reliable sources independent of the sport and school to establish notability. Note that notability is established if sources exist not if they are mentioned in the article.


 * This project will often use the College Football Data Warehouse as it is considered a reliable source. This database is linked to many, many pages on Wikipedia for statistics and biographical information. Editors also will reference the school website itself for historical data on coaching changes, records history, coaching tenure, etc.  The project consensus contends that there is no better source than the school itself for information on who the coach is at any given time. Neither of these sources are independent of the subject and therefore neither can be used to establish notability. However, they are useful as complementary sources in many articles.

Too Long Ago: This happened too long ago, there isn't any way to verify it online. Or Maybe the current coach should be listed, but certainly the coach from a long time ago is not notable.


 * Notability cannot be measured for some historical topics. Football scores from 1910 don't make today's newspapers very often, so editors rely more on college historical data, and offline sources. Please also see Notability is not temporary

This coach is too obscure No one has ever heard of this guy, he's only coached at a small school.


 * Specialist Topics are often not well known. Notability does not necessarily arrive from being widely known, but can also arrive from the importance or uniqueness in the field.

Lousy Coach: The coach never won a game or hardly ever won a game


 * A coach having a "losing record" does not disqualify for notability. Notability requirements on Wikipedia specifically state that notability can come from an especially poor performance (such as Vinko Bogataj, the "agony of defeat").  Inside college football, Jake High (one scoreless 0-8 season), Ronald Beard (0-44 over 4 seasons), and George Allen (Cumberland) (who coached only one game and was defeated 222 to zero) as notable examples of coaches with exceptionally poor performances.

It's about the team, not the coach: The articles are about the team, not the coach


 * As long as the coach is one of the focus points, it counts towards the coaches notability. If the coach is not mentioned or only trivially mentioned the article should not be the only source establishing the notability of the coach.

The article is too short There is really no information with this, it's just a stub.


 * See Stub. Stub articles are an important part of Wikipedia. Most articles get their start as stubs, and many stay as stubs for a very long time--maybe for all time.  Once a stub article has been created, other editors will also be able to enhance it.

Academic Standards We should hold coaches to the same academic standard we hold teachers to--the coach must be widely published.


 * No. For coaches, and even professors, notability is established through WP:GNG. WP:ACADEMIC is a guideline that clarifies what GNG means for subjects related to academia, it has no bearing on College football notability.

Head coach notability discussion library
The issue of notability of coaches has been discussed on many occasions on Wikipedia:
 * Articles for deletion/Alvin Parker (delete Oct 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/Alan Gooch (keep July 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/Josh Kotelnicki (keep May 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/Jeff Floyd (no consensus May 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/M. O. Smith (keep April 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/F. P. Reed (no consensus April 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/John Lyman (American football) (keep April 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/Harold Hughs (delete March 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/S. L. Mains (keep March 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/F. W. Sweeney (keep March 2020)
 * Articles for deletion/A. D. Kenamond (Keep July 2019)
 * Articles for deletion/Walter Jewell (no consensus March 2019)
 * Articles for deletion/Ernest Johnson (American football) (Keep Feb 2019)
 * Articles for deletion/William D. McHenry (Keep Dec 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Robert Appleby (American football) (Keep Sept 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Otis Delaporte (Withdrawn Aug. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/T. L. Anthony (Keep Apr. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/Richard Mannello (Withdrawn Jan. 2018)
 * Articles for deletion/J. Arthur Baird (Keep Dec. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Richard S. Lyon (Speedy keep, Dec. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/W. C. Riley (Keep Aug. 2017)
 * Articles for deletion/Robert Duax (Keep Nov. 2015)
 * Articles for deletion/Ron Schipper (Keep Oct. 2015)
 * Articles for deletion/Frank Scalercio (Keep Oct. 2014)
 * (Archives have not been searched for AfDs closed from 2009 to 2013.)
 * Articles for deletion/James McKinley (football coach) (Keep, Sept. 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/Kevin Haslam (football coach) (Delete Oct. 2008, recreated Feb. 2010)
 * Articles for deletion/Oscar Dahlene (Keep May 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/James A. Stevens (Keep May 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/Fay G. Moulton (Nom. withdrawn May 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/Sam B. Taylor (Keep May 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/Hoover J. Wright (Keep May 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/Mike Gottsch (Keep March 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/Prairie View coaches (No consensus May 2008)
 * Articles for deletion/Walter J. West (Delete Sept. 2008, recreated after incubation)

Assistant coaches
Assistant coaches, managers, and other staff subordinate to the head coach may or may not be notable depending on their accomplishments, past programs, tenure, and other factors. However, there are certain qualifications where an assistant coach would be considered notable:
 * assistant coaches who are or have been head coaches
 * assistant coaches who won the Broyles Award, the annual award for the best assistant coach in college football (this satisfies WP:BIO through WP:ANYBIO)
 * assistant coaches who took over head coaching duties on an interim basis for an entire game or multiple games due to the absence, death, or termination of the head coach. This does not apply to assistants who only filled in for part of a game (such as if the head coach were ejected from a game) or who have not coached a game.
 * assistant coaches who were significantly involved in a noteworthy event, though consider also WP:1E as a possible argument against this.

As with other subjects, assistant coaches who do not meet the standards of notability required for a standalone article may still be of enough interest for proportional coverage in related articles (such as team or season articles).

Officials
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Game officials and governing bodies of sports often take the stance that they prefer to keep the focus on the game and off of the officials. This stance is supported by the fact that the College Football Hall of Fame does not induct officials. Should the need arise to reference an official in an article (such as when officials make notable errors as the Fifth Down Game (1990)), editors are encouraged to simply use the term "the official" (general) or "the back judge" (specific official position) instead of listing the name of the person fulfilling the role of the official.

Officials can obtain notability through other means, such as being a head coach. There is a List of NFL officials.

Administrative and other staff
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Like the head coach, the college football project considers the college or university athletic director (AD) to be notable. The reasoning is that the AD is responsible for the program of football as well as other sports and is heavily involved in scheduling games, hiring and firing head coaches, negotiating television and media rights, and long term development projects such as building stadiums. This responsibility has been determined by consensus in the project to be noteworthy activities. Also it is not uncommon for the AD to be the head coach of the football program and sometimes other sports as well such as basketball or track and field.

Past, present, and future (officially announced) athletic directors are considered notable.

Other administrative positions in college sports (such as assistant athletic director or sports information director) are non-notable positions. Naturally people in those positions may gain notability through other means.

Mascots
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Current and past mascots of notable schools are considered notable. Notable mascorts include:
 * 1) character mascots
 * 2) live animal mascots
 * 3) item mascots
 * 4) discontinued mascots.

Broadcasters and sportswriters
The project includes national broadcasters and sportswriters who work in a noteworthy capacity with college football. Some of these key people are involved in creating nationally recognized polls, where others are widely recognized for their contribution. Examples include Craig James (American football), Lee Corso, and Chris Fowler. (James is also separately notable for his playing career, and Corso for his coaching career.)

Fact vs Fiction
Fictional events or people in college football, such as the films The Program, Everybody's All-American, and Necessary Roughness are outside the scope of the project.

Many films and books are based on fact but have fictional components. On occasion, the project may point to movies and books that focus on events that really happened, such as the films Knute Rockne, All American, Rudy, and We Are Marshall. Wikiproject College Football will also coordinate with other Wikiprojects involved with those topics, such as WikiProject Films.

College Football Deletion FAQ
Please read also the introduction of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions if you came via a direct link to this subsection.

Below are some of the frequently asked questions encountered concerning the creation, editing, and deletion of articles within the scope of the college football project. If you do not understand the directions or just would like some help, post a notice on the College Football project talk page describing what happened and ask us for help.

Please bear in mind Etiquette during all deletion discussions.

Q: Someone deleted an article I posted... what should I do?
A: That stinks, but it happens. Here is the recommended method for handling a college football project page that has been deleted.


 * 1) Don't panic.
 * 2) Be nice.
 * 3) Read Why was my page deleted?
 * 4) Follow the instructions at Why was my page deleted?
 * 5) Do not put the page back up immediately this can lead to all kinds of misunderstandings by the page being deleted again... and again... and being protected (locked)... and possibly even you as an editor being locked out of Wikipedia for a period of time.
 * 6) Be nice.
 * 7) Check the deletion review log to find the editor that deleted the page.  Politely ask the editor why it was deleted and ask the editor to restore the page.
 * 8) If that does not get satisfactory results, follow the instructions above and opening a Deletion review.  You will likely get the page restored at least temporarily and can begin improvements, although that may not happen right away.  Even if the page should ultimately be deleted, this is almost always a worthwhile effort as it helps to gain a better understanding as to what makes a good article in Wikipedia.

Q: The article I am working on has been marked for speedy deletion... what should I do?
A: Please know the difference between deletion and speedy deletion.  Here is the recommended method for handling a college football project page that has been marked for speedy deletion.
 * 1) Be nice.
 * 2) Immediately visit Template:Hangon and follow the instructions.  This will involve placing a "hangon" template on the page in question and giving a reason to prevent the speedy deletion.  Reasons such as "page is currently under development" or "currently revising page" should be acceptable.
 * 3) Check the history of the page in question to locate the Wikipedia editor who placed the speedy deletion tag.  Go to the editor's talk page and nicely ask the editor to consider removing the tag, giving a reason.  The editor will usually either remove the speedy deletion tag, or remove the speedy deletion tag and nominate the article for deletion.
 * 4) Read Deletion policy
 * 5) Begin improving the article

Q: The article I am working on has been marked for deletion... what should I do?
A: Please know the difference between deletion and speedy deletion.  Here is the recommended method for handling a college football project page that has been marked for deletion.
 * 1) Be nice.
 * 2) Visit the discussion page for the article listed in the template (it will look like this: Articles for deletion/Chris Crane).  Read the comments why the editor believes the article should be deleted.  Do not respond right away, it is not necessary.  It is better to formulate clear arguments and prepare the article to meet the requested standards while giving a chance for your emotions to subside so you can (you guessed it) be nice.
 * 3) Look through the discussion page to determine who nominated the article for deletion and place the Template:CFBNotability notice on the user's TALK page.
 * 4) Read Articles for deletion
 * 5) Notify the college football project by placing an entry on the project main page at WikiProject College football.  This is all you should need to do for notifying other college football editors to the situation.
 * 6) Be nice (it's really important!)
 * 7) There are two primary methods to respond or overturn deletion arguments:  a) overcome the deletion argument by enhancing or improving the article so that the deletion argument is no longer an issue, or b) respond to the deletion argument itself.  Use them in that order.
 * 8) Place the College Football Project template on the article talk page if it is not there already.
 * 9) Place appropriate categories at the bottom of the article page.
 * 10) Look for similar articles that may link to the page--for example, a school's current starting quarterback article should be referenced from the team page and possibly the coach's page.
 * 11) Look for additional information and sources for the article page
 * 12) Be nice.
 * 13) Also, be sure to consider the possibility that the article should be deleted.  That's what the discussion (and improvement time) will help to determine.

Q: The article I am working on has a notability tag at the top... what should I do?
A: This is when the article has not been nominated for deletion, but someone has expressed concerns to notability by placing the Template:notability template on the page (which, if unchecked, can lead to deletion). Here is the recommended method for handling notability concerns.
 * 1) Be nice.
 * 2) Consider the reasons given for the tag, it may be a legitimate request--either for more information, more detail, additional sources, or there may be other concerns.
 * 3) Look through the history of the page to determine who left the notability template and place the Template:CFBNotability notice on the user's TALK page.
 * 4) Begin improving the article.

Q: The article I am working on has been dramatically changed by another editor... what should I do?
A: Relax. That's what happens in Wikipedia! If the changes improved the article, be encouraged! If you think the changes made the article worse, go to the article's discussion page (sometimes called a talk page) and engage other editors on the subject. Oh, and be nice.

If, however, you think that the changes are damaging to Wikipedia in some way (such as containing false information, vandalism, contains copyrighted material, etc.) then be WP:BOLD and make further changes as you see fit. You can even undo the changes (and if it's obvious vandalism, you should). And be nice.

Q: I am doing some major work on an article and would like to avoid edit conflicts... what should I do?
A: Read Template:Inuse for instructions. You can place the "in-use" header at the top of the page while you are completing major work. Please remove it when you have completed.

Q: I would like to create an article about a topic in college football, but I do not see it covered in this essay... what should I do?
A: Be bold and create the article. Place the college football project template at the top of the article's talk page and create a notification on the project home page about the new article. Also, make an entry on this essay's talk page about what you think was missed and why you think it should be added.

Q: I think that these guidelines should be changed/modified/enhanced... what should I do?
A: Start a discussion on this essay's talk page. Be nice and state your concerns. Project editors will be happy to engage and discuss your ideas.