Wikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languages/Assessment

Assessment discussion
If you want to change, dispute, or remove any article tagged with WP conlangs Class or Importance tags, please make a note of it below this line, starting with ===ARTICLENAMEHERE===. Thanks!

Lingua Franca Nova
I have changed the class tag to B for Lingua Franca Nova. If anyone finds this inappropriate, please assist us by explaining what we need to do to merit the B class tag. Thanks! 68.82.216.178 (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Esperanto Wikipedia
This article has been improved above Stub level. -- Yekrats (talk) 22:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Simlish
I have removed the WP conlangs tag from this article. Simlish isn't a conlang at all, it is (as the article explains) a deliberate effort to avoid creating a language. The tag was added by a bot a few months back, and since then every once in a while some confused soul tries to add it to List of constructed languages. I figured removing the tag would save trouble with the list. --Pi zero (talk) 14:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Interlingue
This article has been improved above Start class. Mithridates (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Indeed, I have been following your work on the article and all I can say is: chapeau, tremendous job! For now, I have reassessed at as B class. My opinion is that this would make a very good candidate for a Good Article. If you wish to submit it, I am willing to do a review.
 * At the moment, I can think of two things that could use some improvement, though. First of all, post-war history, especially also something about the current situation. And secondly, I can't find much about verbs in the grammar section.
 * Thank you for your great work! Cheers, &mdash;IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu?  11:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Will do! And thanks for the quick reply. The verbs will be the easiest to add. I am right at the post-war section now and haven't added much yet as I actually haven't been able to ascertain exactly what led to the collapse and I can't add outright speculation. But I do notice a *lot* of complaining about printing costs and being unable to send issues to Germany and get payment from there (Allies did not permit it for a while) and I think the migration to Interlingua may have been largely due to sheer fatigue from shoestringing it for so long and the well-funded yet similar Interlingua may have been too much to resist. I should find out soon whether that's correct or not. For the period after that I have been in contact with the Interlingue-Union and have brought up the subject of getting some Cosmoglottas from the decades after so that may help if they can provide them. Mithridates (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Toki Pona
Toki Pona is the first conlang to get an ISO 639-3 code since 2008, so I have bumped its importance assessment to Top. Bowler the Carmine |  talk  15:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry to be a spoilsport, but this is incorrect. Three other conlangs received ISO 639-3 codes in the meantime: Neo (2012), Talossan (2013) and Balaibalan (2020). &mdash;IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu?  17:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)