Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/US Military


 * The following discussion is an archived proposal of the WikiProject below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or the WikiProject Council).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The resulting WikiProject was not created

Description
A project that has anything to do with the US military (e.g. Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Marines). Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Support
Please specify whether or not you would join the project.
 * 1) Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) It already exists. 65.93.14.196 (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree. First expand the task force, then come back. WikiCopter (t • c • g &bull; simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 05:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) per kirill and ip65 Fifelfoo_m (talk) 05:43, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose. There's already a U.S. Military task force at WP:MILHIST, no need for duplication. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Per the above - you'll be very welcome at WP:USMIL though. EyeSerene talk 10:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose per above. We already have a task force at MILHIST that covers U.S. Military articles. JJ98 (Talk) 03:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Discussion

 * This already exists. Kirill [talk] [prof] 02:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No, this does not exist. The task force listed above deals only with history. This would deal with history, but also stuff like forts, bases, generals, etc. - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 13:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, the task force does indeed cover all of those topics; you can check the lists on the task force page for a cross-section of the coverage. (In general, WP:MILHIST uses "military history" in the inclusive sense; that is, it covers both current and historical military affairs.) Kirill [talk] [prof] 16:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or at the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.