Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/United States courts and judges


 * The following discussion is an archived proposal of the WikiProject below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or the WikiProject Council).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The resulting WikiProject was created at Wikiproject United States courts and judges

WikiProject United States courts and judges
Since the support for this project seems fairly strong, I've gone ahead and set up a project page, although this is of course subject to change. bd2412 T 18:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Description
I propose the creation of this project to oversee the thousands of articles falling into the following areas:
 * 1) Biographies of U.S. state and federal judges  - there have been over 3,000 Article III United States federal judges, and well over 4,000 if you count United States magistrate judges and judges of the United States bankruptcy courts, United States Tax Court, United States Court of Federal Claims, and United States territorial courts.
 * 2) Articles on judicial districts - there are over 90 United States district courts, and thirteen circuit courts. Presently, the articles on the individual districts lack standards of uniformity
 * 3) Articles on federal specialty courts such as the United States Tax Court and the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board.
 * 4) Articles on federal courthouses and similar facilities in which federal court proceedings are held (most districts have proceedings in multiple cities within the district, with one main courthouse and several branch courthouses).

Support

 * 1) bd2412  T 03:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) THF (talk) 03:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Nsaum75 (talk) 04:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Cdogsimmons (talk) 03:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Famspear (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 7)  Eastlaw  talk ⁄ contribs 10:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 17:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

SWPP

 * WikiProject United States courts and judges
 * United States courts and judges

Support

 * I'm amazed that we see people spending time fighting in AFD to keep ephemeral trivia answers, people whose minor plays have had two reviews, third-string athletes, and fifth-rate garage bands while some of the most important people in the American legal community have stubs or even redlinks. Any sound project to promote the filling in of these shameful gaps in the encyclopedia is to be lauded. THF (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: thanks to this project, there are no more article III federal judges with red links! However, now there are an awful lot of stubs. bd2412  T 03:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Some states elect judges, some states use a variation of the appointment system. All U.S. Federal judges are appointed. Regardless of how they get into office, every day their actions have implications that affect all of us; sometimes in major ways.  Yet, with rare exception, a number of very notible members of society have managed evade inclusion in this encyclopedia.  This project would help to rectify the situation and add to the betterment of Wikipedia. --Nsaum75 (talk) 04:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * In addition to the above, I would point out that the history of the District Courts is inextricably intertwined with the history of the judges who served on them - and right now, the articles on the District Courts are terribly inconsistent, and stubby. This project would be a place to set up a model of the minimum elements for such articles (e.g. history of creation, subdivision, boundary changes, addition of seats; lists of current and former judges; jurisdictional maps, etc. bd2412  T 20:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

 * I don't mean to rain on everyone's parade here, but I'm not sure if we need a separate WikiProject solely for this subject. This seems like something more suited to a Task Force.  -- Eastlaw  talk ⁄ contribs 03:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * But a task force of what? I think WikiProject Law should be focused on the law, not necessarily on biographies of people who were often political appointees, and some of whom had very little impact on the law. The editors who work on WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases do some biographical work, but really only on Supreme Court Justices. I think this project will round out WikiProject U.S. Presidents and WikiProject U.S. Congress - one project for each of the three coequal branches of government. bd2412  T 00:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, when you put it that way, it actually makes more sense. I'm changing my vote to support.  (I've got to admit, you sure know how to sell an idea.)  -- Eastlaw  talk ⁄ contribs 10:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or at the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.