Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Wellington


 * The following discussion is an archived proposal of the WikiProject below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or the WikiProject Council).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The proposed WikiProject was not created

Description
A WikiProject focused on improving articles related to the Wellington Region J947 01:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

List of important pages and categories for this proposed group
 * wellington (number of pages in the category: mostly subcategories.)
 * wellington (number of pages in the category: mostly subcategories.)


 * List of WikiProjects currently on the talk pages of those articles
 * Please invite these and any other similar groups to join the discussion about this proposal. See WikiProject_Council/Directory to find similar WikiProjects.




 * Why do you want to start a new group, instead of joining one of these existing groups?
 * To make a new group focused on improving Wellington articles, rather than the whole of New Zealand.

Support
Also, specify whether or not you would join the project.
 * 1) I will join the project. J947 01:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Discussion

 * I am pretty sure that the wikiproject council is, somewhat ironically, inactive (just look at the unresponsivness here and at the main talk page). There is nothing stoping you starting this project yourself, but I would recommend making a taskforce under WP:NZ as it is really a sub wikiproject of that one. What exactly are you hoping to aaheive with it? AIR corn (talk) 18:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There are WikiProject Auckland and WikiProject New Zealand Schools, the former which is semi-active, the latter which I would strongly recommend merging into WikiProject New Zealand. In regards to your question, there is quite a lot of good work in Wellington articles, for example the mayoral elections and I think that this should be organised. A way to get more contributors to the project is to start off by making a taskforce for it then when it get's a reasonable amount of active members make a standalone project.  J 947  20:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I still would got the taskforce route. There is not much difference in what you can achieve with article alerts, guidelines and having a central talkpage. It just means most of the infrastructure (Banners, templates etc) are already there. Just my 2c though. AIR corn (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Taskforce/workgroup of WP:WikiProject New Zealand. No point in a stand-alone project.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ &gt;ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ&lt;  22:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or at the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.