Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Peer review/2008

Requests via old method (effectively an archive)

 * Bodyline I've made quite a few changes to this article before I realised it was FA class so I'm a bit concerned. Most of my changes were based on info in the Douglas Jardine article however none of it is really sourced. Having said that, none of the info in bodyline is directly sourced either. I've tried to make clear why I felt the info is important in the talk and it seems better now (assuming the DJ article info is correct). I also feel there is a bit more info in the DJ article that maybe should be moved or copied to the bodyline article but I'm hesitant to change an FA any more by myself especially given that I don't know much about the controversy. There's also an issue that needs to be addressed in the talk. On a related note, I also think the DJ article needs to be trimmed since the bodyline article should be the main article for the controversy. We probably should go in to a bit of detail in DJ especially in relation to his role but probably not as much as we currently do IMHO. Nil Einne 18:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Bart King - Well...I think I've finished my work on the article. It is up for Peer Review right now, and when that is done, I'm going to try it out as a Good Article Candidate. After all the input is gathered up there, I'll try putting it together for an FAC. In the meantime, any other advice or opinions that can be given by members of the project would be most welcome. I've put a lot of work into it, so if you could at least take a look, I'd be grateful. Once this is done, I'll take a little break back with WP:HV before tackling the rest of the Philadelphian cricketers. Thanks a lot.-- Eva  b  d  19:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Lord's Cricket Ground - Currently unassessed, but surely of top importance. к1иg   f1$н   £я5ω1fт  18:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Stands to reason, in fairness. I've noticed that no ground that I can find has been rated; I'll go through and rate them at some point. In the meantime I've rated Lord's as High. AMBerry (talk | contribs)
 * I rated The Oval and Melbourne Cricket Ground as high also. Ans e ll  10:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Imran Khan - I was surprised to see it wasn't even part of the WikiProject! - Ozzykhan 22:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Doesn't surprise me, very few grounds had the template on their talk pages until I started adding them... meantime I've rated Imran Khan as High importance and B class. AMBerry (talk | contribs) 22:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * History of United States cricket - Could someone take a look at this page? I've done a pretty bold rewrite and I think it looks pretty good.-- Eva  b  d  14:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks 02blythed 19:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * []. Could someone assess this article. I have not done any work on this but when I stumbled across this article and found that it has not been assessed I thought that I should make you aware of this. I believe that this is a good article and could result in a a good rating if it is assessed. I would be glad if you were able to give this article a rating.


 * I've expanded Bangladeshi cricket team in Pakistan in 2003 from one sentence to a full article. Please have a look - thanks - Ozzykhan 15:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I also started to expand these a little while ago:
 * Australian cricket team in Pakistan in 1998-99
 * Australian cricket team in Pakistan in 1994-95
 * Australian cricket team in Pakistan in 1988-89
 * Australian cricket team in Pakistan in 1982-83 - - Ozzykhan 15:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I created the article on Naseem Ashraf yesterday, after seeing that it was on the list of "most wanted articles for Pakistan Cricket", would like a review. -- Zainub 21:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

- 1998-99 Asian Test Championship - 2001-02 Asian Test Championship - Ozzykhan 21:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a complete re-write of: Asian Test Championship, and moved the championship specific stuff to two subpages:


 * Created page List of Wisden Trophy records is not important but being a list page should be fairly painless to review. Monsta666 22:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like an A class article to me. Could do with one or two more direct links to the sources for the statistics and possibly an expanded lead section but that doesn't diminish its A status as comparable to other FA cricket lists. Ans e ll  23:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok I've added cites so now all tables have sources. The batting/bowling feats have also been sourced and the lead section has also been expanded. Monsta666 11:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I've recently expanded Cayman Islands national cricket team and think it deserves an upgrade from start-class. Would appreciate an assessment. Andrew nixon 17:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Could someone have a look at Kyle McCallan and do an assessment on it. I wrote it a while ago but it currently doesn't have a rating. I'm quite proud of it and think that with a bit more work it could be got up to Good article status. Andrew nixon 14:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hadlow - The section on Hadlow Cricket Club is not referenced, although a list of cricket sources is given. Would this section be better split off the main article to form its own article? Mjroots (talk) 16:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It probably would be, though not necessarily for that reason. It just doesn't seem a very good "fit" within the article on the village. Ordinarily a village cricket team wouldn't be notable, but in this case its history appears to be distinguished enough that it probably is and so merits its own article. JH (talk page) 17:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If it is split, it needs to be born in mind that Hadlow Cricket Club is still active (AFAIK) and at least a paragraph on the modern club will be needed. Mjroots (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * There has been no objection on the Hadlow talk page, so I'm going to split the section off into a new article Hadlow Cricket Club.Mjroots (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hadlow Cricket Club now has its own article, the remarks re referencing still apply, as although the sources are mentioned, there is no way to tell which statement comes from which source. ✅ Mjroots (talk) 13:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC) The referencing issue has been addressed. Mjroots (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * List of Test cricket centuries by Sachin Tendulkar - I created a new article. Can this be assessed and any comments for improvement are a welcome too! Thanks and regards, Mspraveen (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Grateful for assessment of English cricket team in Australia in 1994-95, currently listed as "start class", which I've expanded greatly over several months. Cheers. --Dave. (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Roger Davis (cricketer) huge changes to this article today (April 12) reassessment please ) --SGGH speak! 21:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)