Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Quiz/archive55

Q1081
Alan Davidson recalls that he would listen to the 1938 series on his bush radio via a shortwave broadcast from England and the waves would get dropped frequently .At this point of time ABC radio would inturn revert to something else to provide the updates.This actually gave rise to a term that was in vogue upto the late 40s in cricket broadcast terminology.What did ABC do and what was the term used ? Sumant81 (talk) 03:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

'Synthetic' broadcasts? When commentators used cables from London and sound effects to recreate the match in play. LenMutton (talk) 04:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That is correct,The "Synthetic" commentary came live from a Sydney studio.For a ball by ball coverage,commentators would simulate the games events based on cables received from England with a sound effects man providing applause and background crowd noise.This gave rise to the term "Synthetic" tests. Sumant81 (talk) 05:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1082
What seemingly insignificant decision, taken in Melbourne in 1985, came to be seen as an important step in the history of women's cricket? LenMutton (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Women's test matches were of four-day duration since 1985. Is that what you mean? Ovshake (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

No. That was one of the major decisions. Time for a clue. This changed the way people wrote about women's cricket. LenMutton (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No longer referring to the players as "Miss" or "Ms" on the scorecard. WillE (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

No but you are getting there. LenMutton (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It was decided that all "batters", including women, would be coined as "batsmen". Ovshake (talk) 04:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

This was possibly triggered by a newspaper report on the women's Ashes test in Gabba in 1985 that had used the word "nightwatchbatperson" (why not "nightwatchperson"?), though I'm not sure. Ovshake (talk) 05:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Bingo, Ovshake. Rachel Heyhoe Flint felt this as a major move to establish women as international cricketers. And the Ashes Test in 1985 played a part in that move. Your turn, Ovshake. LenMutton (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1083
When India was suffering from an opener crisis in 1970, which surprise name was suggested by a renowned columnist as an option? Ovshake (talk) 15:59, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Abid Ali? WillE (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Or Venkat? WillE (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh no, a lot more bizarre than them. :) Ovshake (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Colin Cowdrey? Or John Jameson? Johnlp (talk) 19:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

It indeed is John Jameson. When Jameson had scored 1,821 runs for Warwickshire in 1970, the eminent journalist Dicky Rutnagur suggested that he should be picked, given that he was born in Bombay, and hence qualified as per the existing ICC rules! Over to you, Johnlp. Ovshake (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1084
"Throughout the tour the amateurs and professionals stayed at the same hotel. This was quite a departure from precedent and... it was a tremendous success. It keeps the team much better together, and promotes a much keener mutual understanding and a feeling that you are all one side, working together to a common end." Which tour? Johnlp (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Guessing Ivo Bligh's England's Australia tour to win back the Ashes 1882-83.Godof86 (talk) 09:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

No, not quite that far back. Johnlp (talk) 10:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Time for a clue. The writer was the captain of the team, which was a successful one. He was associated with a later "success" in the same place, 29 years later. Johnlp (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The quotation marks around "success" pointed me at 1932-3, and indeed 29 years earlier would be 1903-4. So it was the MCC tour to Australia in 1903-4 (the first tour actually to be under MCC auspices), led by Plum Warner.JH (talk page) 20:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

That's right. Plum's book on the tour is a wonder of pomposity. It concludes with his parting words to his team: "And so, my good comrades on so many battlefields, I wish you a hearty and a grateful good-bye. When next we meet, we shall - many of us - be on opposite sides: we shall be fighting against each other, instead of against a common enemy; the fortune of war will have changed. But one thing will never change. I shall never forget the unswerving pluck with which you fought every inch of the way; I shall never forget the pride of being your leader. I have led great men into battle, and we have come out of the fray victorious. And now I lay down the staff of office with gratitude and pride." Over to you, JH. Johnlp (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1085
Which journalist and broadcaster, now better remembered for his work in fields other than cricket commentary, was the Australian representative on the BBC radio commentary team for the 1956 Ashes series? JH (talk page) 20:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Clive James?&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 23:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Michael Charlton ? Sumant81 (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Robert Hudson? Ovshake (talk) 05:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Sumant81 is correct. It was Michael Charlton. Though Australian by birth, either before or not long after that series he made his home in the UK, so that was where the greater part of his career occurred. JH (talk page) 09:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1086
My only reference for this question is an article in Wisden Cricketer Monthly.So am not really sure if it is correct.What first(non-statistical) happened in the history of first class cricket in England in this match ? Sumant81 (talk) 09:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A streaker? Ovshake (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No the information can be found out from the scorecard. Sumant81 (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * First time anyone 31* overnight was reported to be on 318*. I defy you to say that's wrong!!! WillE (talk) 11:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That would count as statistical in my book though :) Sumant81 (talk) 13:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hint time,This is something to do with the umpires in this match. Sumant81 (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * ?The first time two overseas-born umpires officiated in an English county match? I find that hard to believe... Johnlp (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That is correct.First time,two foreign born umpires in an English First Class Match.I found that hard to believe also but that is what this article says."They later became the first two foreigners to stand together in a first-class match." And it was Cec's birthday today as well.! The article infact says in a first class match and not restricted to England,which is even more suspect to me.Sumant81 (talk) 16:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1087
What feat was achieved for the first time in this match and by whom? Johnlp (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * First player (Clarrie Grimmett to dismiss a batsman for a golden duck, and also record one himself while batting in a Test match?&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Tommy Scott's 4 for 0 to end the Aussie innings on the third morning? LenMutton (talk) 01:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Neither of these. As with the previous question, this is something that looks so commonplace that I'd thought it would have been done before; but according to a book I have, it hadn't been. Johnlp (talk) 07:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Oldfield's 4 stumpings in the match? This was the third time he had effected 4 stumpings in a game, after the two occassions against England in 1925. LenMutton (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Nope, not that either. To hurry things along, I'll say that the perpetrator was making his Test debut in this match, though the fact that he was a debutant isn't relevant to the answer. Johnlp (talk) 11:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A captain scoring unbeaten twin fifties the way Jackie Grant had? Ovshake (talk) 11:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

OK. Actually, my source says this is the first time anyone had scored unbeaten fifties in the two innings of a Test match... which I find hard to believe. Anyway, you're on for the next question, Ovshake, and I can get back to work without looking at this surreptitiously all the time. Johnlp (talk) 11:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Goodness, you're right, it almost sounds impossible! Ovshake (talk) 11:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1088
Which cricketer's name was once looked up (in vain) in the Walt Disney Studios employees' list? Ovshake (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Don Bradman ?? Sumant81 (talk) 12:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

No. But you're close on the era. The story is somewhat interesting. Ovshake (talk) 16:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Denis Compton. --Roisterer (talk) 02:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely. When Tim Rice won the Academy Awards for Lion King he said "I'd like to thank Denis Compton, a childhood hero of mine." A confused employee looked up the employee list and famously said "We don't know who Denis Compton is. He doesn't appear to be of Disney Studios or have anything to do with them." Roisterer, your turn. Ovshake (talk) 06:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1089
Which Australian Aboriginal once took the field as a substitute fielder for England in a Test match? --Roisterer (talk) 11:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Faith Thomas? Ovshake (talk) 14:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Affie Jarvis? Not sure whether he was aboriginal, though. Ovshake (talk) 14:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The player in question is male and it happened relatively recently. Interestingly he never played first-class cricket in Australia. --Roisterer (talk) 23:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Jeff Cook seems to fit the bill.looking at list here Sumant81 (talk) 14:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Jeff Cook took the field for England as a substitute fielder (in place of captain Nasser Hussain) in this Test against Pakistan at Lords in 2001. Following his retirement from first-class cricket and his return to Australia, Cook discovered he is of Kamilaroi descent. Good work Sumant81, have a turn. --Roisterer (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

In Sumant's absence perhaps someone else can ask a question? --Roisterer (talk) 23:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry been travelling,haven't had a chance to get back on the net :) Sumant81 (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1090
I'll move things on.

Connect a badly spelled ogre, a biblical garden, a substantially Bermudan Glamorganer, and a split eye lid. This incident was reported in the 2007 Wisden. Explain... WillE (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Eden Project - Bio Degradabale box made from "hemp" .They wanted to test out the strength of the box and during the test,the batsman wearing the box got hit on the face leading to a split eye lid.! Sumant81 (talk) 02:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The bowler was of course the loveable ogre Charlie Shreck - batsman was the inventor Ben Foster. .&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 17:20, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Precedent says that as MDC completed the answer, he gets to ask the next question. Sorry, Sumant! WillE (talk) 17:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Haven't got one right now, so if Sumant thinks of one before I do (i.e. in the next few hours), go ahead with it. I'll see what I can come up with anyway.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 23:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1091
Why are these bowling figures special? 11.5-2-37-5 and 29.2-6-59-6 &mdash;MDCollins (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Best bowling figures by a one-test wonder, C.S. Marriott, for England v West Indies,3rd Test at Kennington Oval, London, 1933 Wizvikz (talk) 13:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Not quite what I was looking for - anything else about it?&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 14:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Clue: you have the player and the match - something statistical arises from these figures.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Something about Marriott finishing the game with two wickets in two balls? And not having a chance for the hat-trick because he didn't play again. He might have even been on a hat-trick at the end of the first innings. LenMutton (talk) 02:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC) No. I'm looking for a career record that he still holds today. Further clue later.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Only instance where a bowler has taken 10 wickets in a match, and more wickets than maiden overs? Ovshake (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Best 'worst ever' innings/match figures for a player (i.e., in his entire Test career his worst innings [match] return was 5-37 [11-96])?--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

No - think wider than just that match. It was an 'average' performance...&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 22:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Highest average number of wickets per innings (5.5)? The freak nature of his Test career lends itself to all sorts of average-related records, but I'll just make the one guess!--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Not quite - this is a lowest (best) average. The equivalent (worst) is held by Mohammad Sharif, closely followed, a little surprisingly, by Ian Salisbury.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 22:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah...My second-choice guess after the above was 'best career bowling average, with at least ten wickets taken'. And I now see that Sharif and Salisbury have the worst averages. I'm surprised to see Chris Harris as the third worst, and Shoaib Malik as fifth!--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 23:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

That's it. In fact the only sub-10 bowling average with the 10 wicket qualification. Over to you.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry Fred Martin, but your 14 Test wickets at 10.07 are just not good enough!--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 00:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, since I actually created the template you would think I might have known the answer to this question. --Roisterer (talk) 01:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1092
What unusual event has occurred 17 times in Test matches; for the first time in this match, and most recently in this match ? It could not have occurred before July 1930. The last match where it could have happened (but it didn't) was this one .--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 00:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

So is that match the last possible time it could happen, or could it happen again?
 * It certainly could happen again - there are several players still playing who could cause this to happen.--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 15:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Something to do with unbeaten centuries/double centuries and a half-century in the same match?&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 21:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't. It happened in the 1934 match above, and again in 1937. After a 28-year gap, it happened nine times between 1965 and 1969. After that, there was a 36-year gap, and it has happened six times since 2005. It happened once in each of those games, except for this match where it happened twice.--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Is it the highest partnership (over 200 runs or so) that takes up over 50% of the total? Or two players contributing more than 75% or the runs or something?&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 23:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It is related to a certain combination of players involved in a dismissal (or, in the one case, dismissals) in the match.--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 00:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

A player with a triple century dismissed another. The first two triple centuries were scored in 1930, so it couldn't have happened before then. (Not that Sandham played again after scoring his.) &mdash;Raven42 (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That's correct, Raven42. Because of Sandham, the first time a triple-centurion faced another's bowling would probably have been in this match . Of the total 18 wickets of this sort taken, 7 were taken by Garry Sobers. The next question is yours.--AllylViolinPudding (talk) 10:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1093
In Raven's absence I might ask the following: Archie Jackson's sisters once said that Archie's voice was so similar to a certain actor's voice that whenever the actor appeared on tv, they would pretend he was Archie and have conversations with him. Who was the actor with Archie's voice? --Roisterer (talk) 22:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Probably a silly guess (considering that you've said 'actor') but I would have thought a young Archie would have had a girlie voice. So I am going with Gene Kelly. LenMutton (talk) 00:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Roger Moore? Ovshake (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Roger Moore it is. Archie Jackson had a surprisingly distinguished voice, apparently. --Roisterer (talk) 06:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Q1094
For whom was the following line said (followed by the choicest of expletives)? "I win the World Cup, but you get all the goodies." Ovshake (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This was said shortly after the 1992 world cup. Ovshake (talk) 13:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

The quote was Javed Miandad's. Ovshake (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Imran Khan or Wasim Akram? WillE (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)::
 * Ian Botham? Sonix768 (talk) 05:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

No. But Sonix is correct that he's a cricketer from another country. And the catch is, he got all the "goodies" in Pakistan. Ovshake (talk) 06:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Lance Klusener for winning the Player of the Tournament: 280 runs, 17 wickets.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 10:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Wrong World Cup. Try Martin Crowe instead.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 10:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

No, the person didn't play in the world cup at all, though he's definitely a legend of the game. He had simply predicted that Pakistan would win the world cup, even after the first five matches. Ovshake (talk) 10:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * He's an Indian. Ovshake (talk) 12:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Gavaskar? LenMutton (talk) 13:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

It indeed was. He was invited by many Pakistanis, people and agencies, and was showered with gifts, often more lavish than the actual heroes. Over to you. Ovshake (talk) 06:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Q1095
What was the "emotional" signifance of this match? LenMutton (talk) 17:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * None of the three W's of the West Indies played this match?Probably for the first time in many years? Sumant81 (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Not what I'm looking for. Clue 1: It was a highly emotional match for one of the players who took part. He has written about his mental state during this game and how he - despite doing greater things in other games - remembers this match vividly. LenMutton (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * First Test in Jamaica since the death of Collie Smith following a road accident in England. Gary Sobers was also involved in the accident and may have been rather emotional about the century he made in Smith's home town? Johnlp (talk) 20:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Bang on, Johnlp. Sobers got a rather muted reception in Kingston and, according to his book Cricket Crusader, he was deeply anguished during the innings. He said that he always felt as if Collie was within him when he batted in Kingston to deliver the innings that death had denied him. LenMutton (talk) 01:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Q1096
This should be easy. This is another Test at Kingston. What was odd about this one? Johnlp (talk) 08:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * A lot of "firsts" in this match... First West Indies series victory, first time they won by an innings... And first time they had a Black captain, as Constantine led the side when Grant was injured. Is that last fact what you are looking for? OrangeKnight (talk) 10:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You're close, but the thing I'm looking for involved two players, only one of whom you've so far mentioned. Johnlp (talk) 11:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * One unusual aspect of this Test was Barrow opening the innings with Christiani. One of the rare times two wicketkeepers opened. LenMutton (talk) 02:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

No, this is to do with captains, and is pretty obvious, but is also, according to a book I have, the first time it had happened. Johnlp (talk) 07:18, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Guess both sides captains had to retire injured.Bob Wyatt as well as Jackie Grant were both off the field.The former getting a hit on the jaw and the latter having sprained his ankle.Is that the connection-that this was the first time both captains were off the field? Sumant81 (talk) 07:39, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

That's right... or at least according to a book I have it was the first time both captains were prevented by injury from batting (or carrying on batting) in a Test. Over to you, Sumant. Johnlp (talk) 08:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Q1097
Why did Barry Richards play as a guest player for Transvaal in this match ? Sumant81 (talk) 13:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Wasn't this the season Richards played for South Australia rather than for Natal? Did that make him temporarily an "overseas" player in terms of South African cricket (and he was playing for Hampshire in England too at that time)? Johnlp (talk) 16:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Very good guess,but unfortunately not the right answer.He actually had the offer to play in the Rest of South Africa team and chose not to for a certain reason.Sumant81 (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * A very significant incident took place in this match.It is even mentioned in one of the Wiki articles related to cricket in South Africa.The incident is connected to the answer as well. Sumant81 (talk) 09:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It was a trial match for the forthcoming tour of Australia. All the players walked off the pitch to protest against the non-selection of non-whites. Richards wanted to be a leading part of that protest? --Roisterer (talk) 10:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Will give it to you.It was planned that everybody would walk off the field after one ball was bowled.This was pre-planned by Barry Richards, Mike Procter and Graeme Pollock.Mike Procter told Barry Richards that he would bowl one ball to him,and then they could all walk off the field and read out the protest statement.For this reason,Barry decided to play for Transvaal.There is a news report here Sumant81 (talk) 12:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Q1098
According to David Hookes, dropping who from the South Australian side was the most painful/difficult action he ever had to perform in cricket? --Roisterer (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I will go with a guess from a different country ,Joel Garner Sumant81 (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How about himself? Johnlp (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No to both. It was another SA born Test cricketer. --Roisterer (talk) 22:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Darren Lehman? LenMutton (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Guess: Wayne Philips. –Moondyne 02:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No to either but surely there can't be too many more possibilities. --Roisterer (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hookes was on record saying that dropping Darren Berry (for showing up late to training) was his hardest leadership decision in cricket, but that was from the Victorian side, not the South Australian. --Nick Boalch \ talk 13:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it someone on this page? –Moondyne 13:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It is most certainly someone on that page. In fact I just read said cricketer's article and I see that the request that led to Hookes dropping him (and ending his f/c career), was earlier made to Hughes when said cricketer was in the national side and Hughes complied with the request. --Roisterer (talk) 22:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Greg Blewett? LenMutton (talk) 14:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Tempted to say Don Bradman then re-work the Gareth Edwards song.... 164.36.44.4 (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How about Jeff Crowe ? Sumant81 (talk) 06:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No, South Australian born. All you've got to do is think of a South Australian born Test cricketer from the same era as Hookes. There weren't that many of them. --Roisterer (talk) 08:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Becoming a guessing game :) ,Rick Darling Sumant81 (talk) 09:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Greg Chappell?&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 09:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Rick Darling!! it is. Whew. Darling asked Hookes if he could be dropped down the order because he thought he had a better chance of returning to the Australian side. Hookes saw it as a weakness and dumped Darling from the SA team, never to play again. Darling was only 29 at the time. As mentioned, in Darling's article it shows he made the same request to Kim Hughes but with a completely different response. --Roisterer (talk) 09:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Q1099
From an old match report,in the Sportstar.Identify the odi match,plenty of clues in the question.I have masked certain portions that would give away the answer?

"This was supposed to be a grudge match.However the crowd was solidly behind the touring team,so much so that Wes Hall the manager remarked "Man it was as though we were playing at Kingston" .Every *** dismissal was encouraged and applauded with a fervor which could not have been mistaken for extreme sporting spirit.There were few to cheer **** at the newly inaugurated ***** stadium" Sumant81 (talk) 04:15, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * India v West Indies at Srinagar. West Indies were smarting from the '83 World Cup loss. This was the first ODI in Srinagar's Sher-i-Kashmir Stadium. Political under-currents were running high. India were to feel the brunt till rain saved them further embarrassment. LenMutton (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct,this was the first match at Srinagar.The World Cup loss was just a few months back,The Kashmir issue was boiling,and the entire crowd rooted for West Indies.Sumant81 (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Q1100
What record resulted because of something that happened in this game? LenMutton (talk) 14:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Three captains for the same side in a single test match? VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 15:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Not what I'm looking for. LenMutton (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Clue: Because of something good that happened in this game, the player concerned ended up with a dubious record. Sounds paradoxical but it's true. LenMutton (talk) 15:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Roger Wijesuriya who got his first and only wicket and thus ended up with the worst bowling average and worst strike rate in test cricket ? Sumant81 (talk) 16:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Gotcha. If he hadn't got the wicket, he wouldn't have been on the top of the charts. Your turn, Sumant81. LenMutton (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)