Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Quiz/archive57

Q1121
Okay then, who had a Test batting average of 66 in West Indies, a touch under 100 in India, 53 in England but only 15 in New Zealand? --Roisterer (talk) 09:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sir Garry Sobers. Wikimaze (talk) 10:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Sir Garry. Ovshake (talk) 10:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Oops. Ovshake (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes to both. Sobers himself couldn't understand why he played so poorly in New Zealand. --Roisterer (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1122
Jumping in. In 132 years of Tests, there have been 100 ... (what?). CI says 99, we say 100. –Moondyne 08:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Different test venues? Or cities/towns hosting tests? VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 12:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Venues. Your turn.  –Moondyne 12:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * CI hasn't added SWALEC Stadium to their list yet. –Moondyne 12:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1123
A match winning bowler on a specific ground was hit out thoroughly in one over (turned out to be his last over), but also the match and the test team - it was to be his last test. It was also said that he was dropped from the state and even his club team after that performance, but records show that he did play first class cricket for couple of seasons. Name the batsman who did the damage, the bowler and the ground. VasuVR ( talk,  contribs ) 17:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you sure that the expensive over was his last ? Did he happen to take a wicket after he was hit around ? Chennai Super Cats (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * That is what I remember, including live commentary, reading it next day as well as the weekend magazine sheets, but have not been able to corroborate it with hard evidence from the internet. VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 05:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Holland took Gavaskar's wicket long after Srikkanth was dismissed. So it cannot have been his last over. Chennai Super Cats (talk) 09:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I stand corrected. That is very clear from the score sheet and sorry that I missed it and included an incorrect statement there... VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 09:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Krishnamachari Srikkanth, Bob Holland and Sydney Cricket Ground? Ovshake (talk) 05:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, Ovshake... I believe Srikkanth scored 22 (4 fours and a six, if I remember right). All yours... VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 05:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It does mention test cricket, so it couldn't have been Sanath Jayasuriya, Manoj Prabhakar and Feroz Shah Kotla. Ovshake (talk) 05:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1124
In the 1960s, which overseas cricketer had represented Yorkshire (I hope this has a unique answer)? Ovshake (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Garfield Sobers in this match Sumant81 (talk) 13:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely. And here as well. Ovshake (talk) 15:03, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed, on all of the tour too

Q1125
An umpiring experiment was suggested recently,however this experiment has already been carried out in a few test matches in the early 90s .What is this experiment being referred to and what was the very first instance.?As an convoluted hint,it was also the first instance of a much more famous event in Test Cricket. Sumant81 (talk) 14:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This was started out in Zimbabwe and also occured in SAF. Sumant81 (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Seeing there are no guesses,Karl Liebenberg though famous for first tv umpire decision was also featured in one of those instances. Sumant81 (talk) 02:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This experiment also happened in that famous first tv umpire decision match Sumant81 (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Rotating umpires during a test, session by session? Ovshake (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I can see three umpires and two TV umpires during the test, which is somewhat unusual. Ovshake (talk) 06:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes and there were two parts to the question as to which was the first instance..but I will give it to you as this question has gone for too long .The umpires were rotated on a day by day basis.One of the umpires -the neutral umpire stood on all days and the other 2 local umpires alternated on the days of the test match.The first occurence was in Zimbabwe's first test.This carried on for 6-7 tests in SAF and ZIM till 1993.Sachin had recently suggested that the tv umpire and the onfield umpire switch in a test match to reduce the burden and that was the reference to the recent suggestion. Sumant81 (talk) 12:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Can't think of anything, can anyone post something? Ovshake (talk) 17:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1126
What infamous event did David Frith predict in the aftermath of another infamous event? Get both parts, please... WillE (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * After Somerset qualified for the quarter-finals the Benson and Hedges Cup in 1979 by declaring their 50 over-innings closed after one over (in this match ) to prevent any possibility of being overtaken on strike-rate, David Frith wrote:
 * "I have been waiting, with some trepidation, with six runs needed off the final ball and a lot of money at stake, the bowler informs the umpire of a change of action and rolls the ball along the ground. Maybe this dreadful vision will now vanish."
 * This, of course, happened in that most infamous of matches just under two years later. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Easier than I thought. Over to you Mr or Mrs Pudding. WillE (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be Mr! I remembered it from a rather good cricinfo article about it a few months ago . I haven't got a question ready - someone else can jump in and take this one. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 14:17, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1127
Okay, I'd step in, one question later than when I should've. When Manoj Prabhakar and Nayan Mongia were banned for the rest of the tournament in the Wills World Series 1994-95, Mongia was replaced by Vijay Yadav in the squad. Who replaced Prabhakar? Ovshake (talk) 06:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hasn't he scored 27 Test and 12 ODI centuries since then? - Spaceman  Spiff  06:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

He indeed has. The next question shall have to come from space. Ovshake (talk) 07:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1128
Only Test century was a double, and also a record of sorts at that time; and either a fifty or a hundred, every other Test, on average that is. Who am I talking about? - Spaceman  Spiff  00:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Brendon Kuruppu ? Sumant81 (talk) 00:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, he's played four Tests, one 100, no 50s. So doesn't satisfy the second part. - Spaceman  Spiff  01:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Brad Hodge? Abeer.ag (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The Gillep ? &mdash; Wattmaster (talk) 06:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Not Hodge, that wasn't a record (I'm not including country specific records in my classification) was it? Not Dizzy either, he'd have needed 30 fifties to satisfy the second part. Will post a clue after a couple more wrong answers or after I wake up, whichever is later. - Spaceman  Spiff  06:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Taslim Arif? Ovshake (talk) 06:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Not the answer I was looking for. I wasn't aware of the "wicket-keeper" record. To clarify, the record I'm referring to isn't a "Opener record" or "7 down record" or the like, in addition to not being a country specific record. - Spaceman  Spiff  07:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Martin Donnelly? Dingbatdan (talk) 07:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

The top 10 here are the only ones to have their only hundred as a 200; of these only Hodge and Arif have (100s+50s)/Tests=0.5. Am I missing out on something? Ovshake (talk) 08:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Kirsty Flavell? Johnlp (talk) 09:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I think Dingbatdan has got it. Martin Donnelly was only player to have scored a double century against England (broken only by Nathan Astle recently). The average of a fifty or hundred every other test does not seem to fit (Martin has 5 scores in 7), but as per Ovshake's search none of the others' fit. VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 09:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * You chaps are all too sexist. - Spaceman  Spiff  13:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I should wear my glasses or probably drink a cuppa before I post! Johnlp has one of the answers I'll accept. The two players who fit the bill are Kirsty Flavell (204, 1x100, 2x50, 6 Tests; highest score for five years) and Mithali Raj (214, 1x100, 3x50, 8 Tests; highest score for 1y, 7mo, 1d). You can find out more about women's Test cricket centuries here. - Spaceman  Spiff  14:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1129
As a child, brought up by his grandmother Marie Stuart while his parents were elsewhere, this Test player was known by the nickname "Buffy". Later on, his nickname began with the same two letters, but had an altogether different connotation. Who am I talking about? Johnlp (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * David Lloyd? Ovshake (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Or was it Mark Butcher? Ovshake (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

No to both, though I think I can see the way your mind is working and I wouldn't say it was working incorrectly! Johnlp (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have two more guesses, Chris Rogers, and somewhat obscurely, Waqar Younis (whose grandmother is very unlikely to be called Marie Stuart). Ovshake (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

No to those two. You're right to think Waqar Younis's grandma is unlikely to have been called Marie Stuart, though. ;-) Johnlp (talk) 15:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably wrong but tempted to go with Bunny Lucas Sumant81 (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

No. One of the earlier guesses wasn't so very far away. Johnlp (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * If the guess referred to was Mark Butcher, then the correct answer must be Alan Butcher, who played in one Test and whose nickname was Butch. JH (talk page) 17:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Er, no. Johnlp (talk) 17:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Two suggestions now have been very close. I'll post a clue in half an hour if there's been no movement before that. Johnlp (talk) 19:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Clue: The "elsewhere" where his parents ended up (and where he eventually joined them) was Stevenage. Johnlp (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * After looking at the list of England players whose names began with "Bu", I think that light has dawned. Is it Roland Butcher? Another to be nicknamed "Butch" (cricketers tend not to be very imaginative when it comes to nicknames). JH (talk page) 20:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hooray! Well done. Persistence wins out. Roland Butcher was brought up by his grandmother in the West Indies when his parents migrated to the UK, then joined them (in Stevenage) when he was 13. Over to you. Johnlp (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1130
Which player played only his second Test during a tour of the West Indies where his father was the manager? (I had originally put his Test debut, but had iverlooked a match.) JH (talk page) 21:11, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Was it Jim Parks Junior? Sumant81 (talk) 17:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * No, not Parks. JH (talk page) 17:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Peter Burge? Ovshake (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. Well done. Over to you. I stumbled across the info in a book, and set the question not expecting his Wiki article to be detailed enough to include it. I should have remembered how thorough our Australian colleagues are in their articles, and checked first. :) JH (talk page) 19:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1131
What unusual incident happened at the fall of India's last wicket in their second innings in this match? Ovshake (talk) 06:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Umar Gul running away with the stumps thinking they had won? VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 07:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely. Over to you. Ovshake (talk) 10:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Do not have a question researched / ready... Someone kindly take over this one... VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 06:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Q1132
I'll go if no-one minds, since I did forfeit asking one a few days ago...

Who comes next in this list? Sir Richard Hadlee, Kapil Dev, Curtly Ambrose, Glenn McGrath, Allan Donald, X, X, X, Mashrafe Mortaza, Ryan Sidebottom, ...? They represent the eleven most recent achievers of a specific feat in Tests which has occurred 27 times in total. X represents the same bowler three times; I think it would immediately give it away to have him in the list, but I'll give his name as a clue if people are struggling.AllylViolinPudding (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Who is number 11 ? I see only ten names that were mentioned (including the X thrice) Sumant81 (talk) 02:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Oh I see the questions asks for No 11 and not X Sumant81 (talk) 02:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * While I haven't asked for who X is, I think if you worked out who he was, you'd definitely be able to complete the list (and vice versa)!
 * Hint : The person who completes this list achieved the feat this year, quite recently.AllylViolinPudding (talk) 11:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have a hunch and is it Mohammad Aamer ? Sumant81 (talk) 11:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is indeed Mohammad Aamer. They are the most recent bowlers to have taken a wicket with the first ball of a Test match. Mohammad Aamer dismissed Tim McIntosh with the first ball of the NZ/Pakistan match last week. So X is Pedro Collins, who dismissed Hannan Sarkar first ball in three of the four Tests that they faced each other. The next question is yours, Sumant.AllylViolinPudding (talk) 12:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't Mervyn Dillon also be in this list.Also where can I find the full list,I can see only ten instances here ? Sumant81 (talk) 12:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh dear; I copied this by hand from Statsguru, and left out Dillon - I feel pretty stupid now! Here's the list I was working from AllylViolinPudding (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1133
For lack of a better question,I recently stumbled upon this father son combination that has played in 5 out of 10 possible domestic championships,(For reference the first ones listed in the section recognised matches here First-class_cricket) .I am not sure if there is a duo that may have played in more ..Can you tell me who is this worldwide touring duo that I have in mind? Sumant81 (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The question does look bad,Anyways time for a hint one of them has played for more than one country internationally and that may explain the large number of domestic championships.Sumant81 (talk) 11:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * So it was the father who played for more than one international team and also captained one of them Sumant81 (talk) 12:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Pataudis? WillE (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Not the Pataudis They had 2 domestic championships between them (India and England) Sumant81 (talk) 12:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Jahangir Khan and Majid Khan? Ovshake (talk) 12:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope they have only 4 (Ind,Pak,Aus,Eng) -and another hint -The son has not played internationally yet.! Sumant81 (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Kepler Wessels and Riki Wessels? Ovshake (talk) 14:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Kepler has played in Australia, South Africa and England. Riki in England, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. Ovshake (talk) 14:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct.Riki Wessels earlier this month made his first appearance in Zimbabwe Domestics raising some hopes of him playing for Zimbabwe,especially after Northants ran into legal issues in retaining Riki .I actually do not know if there is a family with much more appearances than this,would be happy to know if someone finds it Sumant81 (talk) 14:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1134
Complete the following sequence: Jimmy Sinclair, Don Bradman, Dave Houghton, _________. Ovshake (talk) 15:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hint: Sinclair, Houghton and our man had achieved this record once each; whereas Bradman had achieved it once, bettered on it, had lost it for a while, and regained it. Ovshake (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sinclair, Bradman and Houghton don't retain their records. Our man does, though it has to do with the fact that it's recent. Ovshake (talk) 07:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Just guessing, Virender Sehwag Sumant81 (talk) 10:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely. I'd give it to you. The only four batsmen till date who have held the top three 100+ individual scores for their respective countries at a certain point of time. Bradman had achieved this once, bettered the third highest score, and after an intervention from Ponsford, had regained it. Ovshake (talk) 11:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That was going to be my answer as well,but when I read your hint that Bradman regained it,I was confused.So am not sure if Ponsford ever held the record.Since when Ponsford made 266 Bradman already had the top 3 scores 334,299*,304 ? Sumant81 (talk) 12:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

My error, actually. Bradman's 304 had actually come before Ponsford's 266. Sorry for the clarification. Ovshake (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1135
Which test team has featured the most player surnames that could be found in a standard Oxford English Dictionary ? For Example:a recent England team  in the 5th Ashes Test featured 4, Bell,Broad,Cook and Prior Sumant81 (talk) 17:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What a nice question! Johnlp (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The best as per my count is 6 and there are nearly as many as 5 instances that have this set of 6.So guess one and points are yours! Sumant81 (talk) 07:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Could it have been the 1989 Australian Ashes team? Border, Taylor, Marsh, Alderman are there but I can't see any others that might fit the bill. MC Rocks (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Does Taylor count? Tailor is a word, but is Taylor a word? Given Taylor's inclusion, do words like Sharpe, Wright, Hawke, Clarke, Crowe etc count? Ovshake (talk) 08:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The Australian team from this match? Noble, Trumper, Hill, Armstrong, Darling and Cotter? Ovshake (talk) 08:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 6 proper words,so Taylor does not count;Armstrong and Trumper are not a word in the dictionary.So they don't count either Sumant81 (talk) 11:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * MCRocks is close to the answer I have but has not got the right combination. Sumant81 (talk) 11:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * And I just realised that Ovshake is also very close to the answer,probably even closer than MCRocks. Sumant81 (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The laird of my Scottish estate invited me over for dinner - wiener schnitzel and something else from across the border. We had to cross a marsh to get there and my beard got all dirty.  I went to wash up and came back all bright and sparkling - so we watched some cricket from the 1980s.The-Pope (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You could have as well done some wood chopping and got some sleep,and not watch this match and the points would still be yours.Well done. Sumant81 (talk) 12:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

To complete several of the Aussie Combination of 80s had at most 6,Boon,Border,Marsh,May,Sleep,Wood. Ovshake almost nailed it with Cotter,Duff,Hill,Kelly,Darling,NobleSumant81 (talk) 12:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I had no idea that Kelly is a word. Trumper and Armstrong actually are, but then, you had mentioned standard. Ovshake (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Neither did I have until I checked it out.My reference was the online dictionary Armstrong and Trumper do not reference a word,while Kelly does Sumant81 (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I would accept your decision, though I'm sure that Trumper is a word. I was curious about the surnames of the legends at some point of time, so had done some research. Armstrong, though, was a hunch. Ovshake (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1136
Rule 3ing...

Whose masterful tome contains a much repeated error asking the reader to consider reading the entrials on the morning of a match (at least in one edition)? WillE (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Erm, can you elaborate? I didn't get the question. Ovshake (talk) 18:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * A well known and reprinted book with a painful spelling mistake repeated over several pages. WillE (talk) 23:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * A well known captain who found inspiration on at least three occasions from a man who was an England first...WillE (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's get this moving with a wild grope in the dark: Mike Brearley The Art of Cricket.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, let's assume, MD, old boy, that you meant "The Art of Captaincy", and I'll give it to you. A chapter is entitled "The Morning of the Match - Reading the Entrails", and at the top of every page after the chapter title page, the heading refers to "entrials". It jumped out and smacked me in the face when I read it first, and still annoys me to this day! This was the updated edition. Over to MDC. WillE (talk)
 * Can you also clarify the reference to three occassions inspiration from a man who was an England first?Sumant81 (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was Roland Butcher, who was name checked three times in the book for wise counsel to Brearley to the benefit of the Middlesex team. WillE (talk) 19:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah-of course I did, oops! Q1137 to follow.&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1137
What does this progression represent? 58, 61, 85, 87, 106, 153 &mdash;MDCollins (talk) 15:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Progression of record for Most Consecutive Test Matches by a player? Sumant81 (talk) 16:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct! Allan Border has the most, and is unlikely to be beaten I'd suggest. Your turn...&mdash;MDCollins (talk) 00:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1138
What dubious feat did a doctor turned part-time cricketer inflict on a record holding test cricketer in a first class match at England in 1995?. Sumant81 (talk) 04:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Can't remember exactly, but it was a Kent bowler called Thompson who got Brian Lara out. Was it a golden after his 501? WillE (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, The Royal Berkshire Hospital surgeon who played for Kent part-time ,Julian Thompson dismissed Brian Lara for a pair,Lara's first ever in his career. Sumant81 (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1139
Which cricketer (a favourite of mine who replaced a similar favourite of mine) has twin sons called Phil and Philbert? WillE (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Time for a hint ? Let me have a shot Phil Defreitas Sumant81 (talk) 06:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Eeek sorry been unexpectedly busy... A key player in the last but one county to win their first trophy. Nicknamed Nobby, but not as Boycesterous as his predecessor. WillE (talk) 12:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Paul Downton Sumant81 (talk) 14:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Norbert Phillip? Johnlp (talk) 14:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's the bunny. I wonder if Phil Philip and Philbert Philip suffered at school? WillE (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This picture suggests some compensation for one of them... Johnlp (talk) 23:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Q1140
Bradman was asked to rate his postwar cricketers (ie, the 1948 Invincibles), man for man, against the 1975 Australian team. He reckoned that, in nine of 11 cases, the 1940s player was better; in only one case was the 1970s player the better of the pair; and in one case he was unable to decide – so the total was 9.5 to 1.5 in favour of the 1940s side. He was then asked to do the same with the England sides from the same era: late 1940s vs 1975. What score did Bradman come up with in this comparison? Johnlp (talk) 14:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 5.5 v 5.5 Sumant81 (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No, rather more weighted in one direction. The article that resulted was in the Melbourne Herald. Johnlp (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Lets try the other extreme: 11 to 0 in favour of one side? &mdash; AMBerry (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ha. No. Somewhere in the middle... Johnlp (talk) 17:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

6.5 - 4.5 in favour of the Archaic Age? Ovshake (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No, but you've got the right "winners". Just think what Bradman was thinking... of course our lot were better than this modern shower... and we had a better standard of opposition as well... not quite as good as us, of course... Johnlp (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

So, 6 - 5 in favour of the Furious Forties? Ovshake (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No. You need to go the other way. Johnlp (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, so 7 - 4. The forties get 7, the seventies 4. Ovshake (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Even further... Johnlp (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Now this is like a streetside bargain... 7.5 - 3.5? Ovshake (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * But as you're the only player at present this could run and run... at least for another full point in the apart direction. Johnlp (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

8 - 3? 8.5 - 2.5? Ovshake (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Will it be unfair if I roll off all the remaining ones in one go? :D Ovshake (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I think it's yours. 8.5 to 2.5 was the right answer. The thing is reported in one of E. W. Swanton's books and as usual with Swanton, who was fond of no one's opinions except his own, he then doesn't bother to elaborate who the players were: apart from saying that he agreed, as ever, with Bradman. Johnlp (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)