Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements/Participants/Noticeboard/archive


 * Should Group 12 elements be taken out of the transition metals element category and placed with the "other metals?" Comment here
 * Should mentions of isotopes in article prose be in the form of 239Pu, plutonium-239 or Pu-239? Comment here.
 * (10 Nov 2008): Should the ==History== sections of element articles be moved up? Comment here.
 * (8 Nov 2008): Accuracy and POV dispute at Californium. See Talk:Californium
 * Should the October COTM be clean-up prior to 0.7 selection? Comment here.
 * Please present your thoughts on the importance rating of the elements here.
 * Should the procedure for assigning A-class status be tightened? Comment here.
 * June-September 2008: Should "poor metals" be moved to post-transition metals and all labelings of poor metals switched to post-transitional metals? Comment it here.
 * August 2008: I propose adding links to the external section for each of the elemenets to the "periodic table of videos" - these videos demonstrate the properties of the elements, interesting facts and were produced at the Uni of Nottingham, UK for the whole periodic table. Please see http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YvSkXd_VVYk as an example.  I have permission from the creator whom would like the videos linked to the youtube site (www.periodicvideos.com - is the orginal site) but he preffered the links to be made to youtube due to bandwidth demands on the original site.  Would users like this to be done or for the videos to be removed - please discuss here. Richnotts (talk) 07:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * June 30, 2008: Several quality-rating classes have been added (C-class, FL-class, List-class, and Template-class). Please leave comments here on what you think on the C-class.
 * 23 April 2008: An edit dispute between two users at Hydrogen over the inclusion of text, merged from Atomic hydrogen (now a redirect), about "nascent hydrogen." Please comment at Talk:Hydrogen.