Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Peer review/Care Bears Movie II: A New Generation/archive2

Care Bears Movie II: A New Generation

 * See also: February 2006 FAC and December 2005 PR

I am sorry to say that, after working so hard to get this page featured the last time, it really is a mess. One of my first efforts on WP has now turned into a mediocre shadow of its past self. The Plot section is really getting on my nerves, even when it is true I started the article; it got so long, it split off into its own article during FAC, and returned to the root page recently.

I am trying once again to get it back to FA, or even more suitably, GA level. (Sorry again if I'm still hunting down the production details...) --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 04:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, xxpor  yo!|see what i've done 01:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
 * it has been
 * might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]