Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Peer review/Quills

Quills
I think this article has improved greatly, but could benefit from another set of eyes! Ultimately aiming for a GA, I would love some feedback on the prose and some advice on how to make it flow a bit more naturally. Would also like to hear what someone who hasn't seen the film has to say about it-- whether the plot description feels complete and informative? Any bits that would be okay to take out? Thank you all so much for your time! M. F. Gaede 04:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Crzycheetah

 * The Cast section needs to go after Production
 * Done!


 * I don't like the placement of the Image:01 quills.jpg. Maybe it can go under the Cast section.
 * I agree. I'd actually kind of forgotten about that image. Done, and considering making it a bit bigger.


 * Keep WP:CITE in mind when adding the refs.
 * Bah! This is so hard to find after the fact! I found a few instances with spaces in between the words and one with extra punctuation. Doh. Habit.


 * Get rid of the "HTML"'s from the references. 90% of the online sources are in html format, so I don't see any need to point that out.
 * I just copied the template verbatim, but yeah, unnecessary information. I did keep the format description for the one that's a PDF file, since that's less common.


 * Try to find a substitute to the imdb sources. IMDB is considered an unreliable source when it comes to business data.
 * Should I replace all the IMDb sources? It's not necessarily impossible, but kind of tough. I can, however, get rid of the IMDb business data listing, since the boxofficemojo.com listing has the same exact information.
 * I would recommend to change all imdb sources.
 * Changed IMDb Film Locations ref to MovieLocations.com ref, Full Cast List ref to Yahoo!Movies cast list ref, simply removed soundtrack ref as unnecessary, kept release date ref as is irreplaceable, changed Marat/Sade IMDb synopsis ref to an official MGM ref. Yahoo!Movies cast list is easier to navigate and more complete (it looks like), MovieLocations.com is v. in-depth and really the only other place I could find with the information


 * You have two tags without . Fix that.
 * Done! Do you have any idea how many times I have noticed this and forgotten to fix it?


 * Is there a reason why the subsections of Reaction use Level 4 headings?
 * Er, because I was equal sign happy? Fixed.


 * Oh and the critical reception under Reaction needs to be the first subsection, in my opinion.
 * All right! I bow to your superior experience!

These were the problems I noticed. I don't see any major issues in this article, other than the reference problems I stated. Good luck in WP:GAC.
 * Thank you so much for your input and keen eyes!

Crzycheetah 19:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)