Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force

{|

Scope
This task force, as part of WikiProject Good articles, is to:
 * standardize the project by ensuring terms and procedures are consistent in order to ensure consistency and ease of use. This entails determining the best terminology to be used so as not to be confusing to users unfamiliar with the project, and standardizing the categories at WP:GA and WP:GAN to allow for easy categorization during the listing process.
 * evaluate and improve the quality of listed articles to ensure that they still meet the criteria. This entails re-reviewing all articles listed at WP:GA, particularly those listed prior to the creation of WP:WIAGA.
 * maintain the quality of the project. This entails keeping clear the lists at Category:Good articles without topic parameter and Category:Good articles without an oldid, ensuring articles tagged and listed without review are delisted, that articles nominated at Good article reassessment are properly reviewed and appropriate action taken, and routinely conducting sweeps to ensure Good articles continue to meet the criteria.

To-do

 * 1) Once the WP:GAN backlog elimination drive is complete, all articles, particularly those listed prior to the creation of WP:WIAGA, need to be re-reviewed to ensure they meet current standards.
 * 2) *For articles that clearly fail to meet the criteria, boldly delist the article from WP:GA and detail the reasoning on the article talk page.
 * 3) *For articles that seem to fail to meet the criteria, but it's questionable, nominate them at WP:GAR.
 * 4) With the high probability that nominations will increase at WP:GAR due to the re-reviews, it is vital that participation be adequate to quickly and appropriately determine whether or not an article should retain GA or be delisted.
 * 5) Standardize the categories at WP:GA and WP:GAN. (See the discussion on the talk page.)
 * ✅ --Jayron32| talk | contribs 20:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Conduct sweeps to ensure Good articles retain their quality.
 * 2) Keep WikiProjectGATasks up-to-date.
 * 1) Conduct sweeps to ensure Good articles retain their quality.
 * 2) Keep WikiProjectGATasks up-to-date.

Open discussions
Please weigh in with your opinion on the following discussion(s):
 * Proposals

Participants

 * - Task force creator.
 * - Been meaning to work on jiving the candidates page categories with the list categories for a LONG time now. Now I have the motivation to do so... Good idea.
 * - Streamlining - So desperately needed
 * - Maybe an article or two...
 * - I want to see things featured!
 * - especially interested in sifting out the weaker ones, if GAs are to be taken seriously, we need quality control, just let me know when we start...
 * - Coordinator of GAC backlog elimination drive. Always available to answer questions related to GA.  OhanaUnited    Talk page   14:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * - aka T Rex, I'm bored and need something to do.  T Rex  | talk  23:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Helped to coordinate the last two GAC backlog drives, and will be helping with sweeps. --Nehrams2020 06:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * - initially helping out with GA sweeps
 * - Long term ambition, full time worker. Universal Hero 21:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * - Joining again. Got a little confused but now I'm here to stay. Thanks to OhanaUnited for clearing things up. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 22:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * - Glad to be accepted as a sweeps participant. Van Tucky  talk 02:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * - This line intentionally left blank.
 * - I'll be focusing on television episodes, and also will work as a utility reviewer. Mastrchf  (t/c) 02:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * brenneman 00:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * - Cities
 * - Mostly biographies, math, science, history and economics. I probably won't touch sports teams, music or movies (unless it is a film that I happen to be very fond of).
 * - forgot to add my name earlier, it looks like. I try to review articles steadily and help with the backlog. Ricardiana (talk) 00:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * – I realize I'm a bit late, but we need to finish this off. Mm40 (talk) 11:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * - coming in at the rear-end, but agree with the above user that this needs completing so we can move forward. ✽ Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  16:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * – I will be helping out with arts related topics. ℥nding · start 15:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * - I have reviewed several GA-nominated articles, and I would like to join to help get rid of the backlogs.Canpark (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * - I will mostly work with GAR. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 09:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * - I will mostly work with GAR. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 09:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Good articles without topic parameters
Category:Good articles without topic parameter states "This is a list of Good articles that have not been given a correct "|topic= " in the template. In theory, the list should be empty."

Scope
This task force, as part of WikiProject Good articles, is to keep empty by adding topic parameters and oldid's to any articles which appear in these categories.
 * the list at Category:Good articles without topic parameter
 * the list at Category:Good articles without an oldid

To-do

 * Add topic parameters to those articles listed at Category:Good articles without topic parameter.
 * Fill in oldid's for GA's that lack them listed at Category:Good articles without an oldid (for articles that use the GA template) and fill in action information for articles listed at Category:Good articles with no article history action (for articles that use the AH template). ✅
 * Select any article within the list.
 * The oldid field should be only numeric characters; some older GA entries may have included "nnnnnn" (a default value in the GA documentation) or a date-like entry and both of these cases should be changed to the correct oldid.
 * To find the oldid, look over the talk page to establish what date the article was promoted. Then check the article history for the last edit of that date. There are tools that can help you find the appropriate oldid.
 * If the article uses the GA tempate:
 * An example of what the template should look like once you've filled everything in is.
 * If the article uses the ArticleHistory template:
 * If the ArticleHistory template lacks a "GAN" (Good Article Nomination) entry within its fields, these should be added. The format of these are:
 * - Value should be "GAN"
 * - The date (YYYY-MM-DD) when the article was made a GA
 * - If possible, a link to the talk page or archive when the page was promoted
 * - "Listed", assuming that the article has been put on the GA list
 * - The oldid, same as with the GA template oldid.
 * - The category under which the articles is listed on the GA list.
 * If there already exist other "actions", use the next highest number to represent this; e.g. if there are 2 existing actions but no GAN, use " " and so forth.

Note: If you find any discrepancies during this process and feel an article may have been promoted without meeting the criteria, nominate the article at Good article reassessment.

Good article topic values
The good article and article history templates will accept any of the abbreviated or full topic names below (defined at Module:Good article topics/data), and are case-insensitive. Any other entry for the topic name will leave the article listed as uncategorized.

List of participants

 * - Task force creator.
 * - To an extent...
 * - I'll help a bit
 * Ok.
 * I'll help when I can.
 * I create GA articles, and don't delete them. Why don't you do something creative?
 * I'll do what I'm able to with the time I have.
 * I'd love to help out.
 * Reviewed 494 GA nomination, swept 164, created 18 as at 01:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll help when I can.
 * I create GA articles, and don't delete them. Why don't you do something creative?
 * I'll do what I'm able to with the time I have.
 * I'd love to help out.
 * Reviewed 494 GA nomination, swept 164, created 18 as at 01:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I create GA articles, and don't delete them. Why don't you do something creative?
 * I'll do what I'm able to with the time I have.
 * I'd love to help out.
 * Reviewed 494 GA nomination, swept 164, created 18 as at 01:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Reviewed 494 GA nomination, swept 164, created 18 as at 01:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Reviewed 494 GA nomination, swept 164, created 18 as at 01:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Reviewed 494 GA nomination, swept 164, created 18 as at 01:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


 * - I have been cleaning out the uncategorized good articles. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)