Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Happy Attack Dog

Happy Attack Dog by Royroydeb
 Status:In Progress 

 Date Started:  2 April 2014

 Date Ended: 

 Recruiter: Royroydeb 

Step One
You first go through WP:Good article criteria and WP:What the Good article criteria are not, then I will proceed. RRD13 (talk) 14:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I read them and understand. Happy Attack Dog  ( you rang? ) 14:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Step Two
Now, I will be taking a quiz. You need to score at 80% to pass. RRD13 (talk) 03:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) What does "broad in coverage means" ?
 * 2) Can an article be failed only because it is not well illustrated?
 * 3) What do you mean by "original research" ?
 * 4) When we can strip off an article of its GA position?
 * 5) Suppose in an article (regarding a person), vital information which defames the person is missing.Can that article be a GA?If not why?
 * 6) What does "stable" mean?

1. It means that the article communicates the main aspects of the topic and it stays on the topic.✅ 2. It can not be failed because it is not properly illustrated because policy does not require a article to be illustrated in order for it to attain GA status.✅ 3. Original research is the act of adding information that is based off of personal experiences (i.e. saying lady Gaga is X years old based off of when you asked her at a concert). ✅ 4. When it has failed to meet the criteria for a good article it can be stripped off of GA status. 5. It can be a article because Wikipedia is a NPOV wiki. Any info that defames the person is prohibited on Wikipedia. 6. It means that there is a sense of calm in editing of the article and that there is not a edit war going on.✅ Happy Attack Dog ( you rang? ) 13:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * 4. It happens also when a GA rated article is promoted to WP:FA. (only .5 for this answer)

5. "Any info that defames the person is prohibited on Wikipedia." - Abiding by the WP:NPOV, this information should be present otherwise the article is not neutral. An article which only praises the person and does not provide criticisms (if any) can't be GA. For example Sri Aurobindo during the first GA review. (no points) So, you score 4.5 points. You have a percentage of 75 which is less the required one. I will suggest you to go through the GA criteria once again before we can go further. RRD13 (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)